TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.   )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

 oPreliminary Proxy Statement

 oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Definitive Proxy Statement
 oDefinitive Additional Materials

 oSoliciting Material under §240.14a-12
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

No fee required.
 o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)
Total fee paid:
 o
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 o
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)
Filing Party:
(4)
Date Filed:

No fee required.


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[MISSING IMAGE: lg_onemain-pn.jpg]
 PROXY STATEMENT 
FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 13, 2022
3:00 p.m. Central Time
601 NW Second Street
Evansville, Indiana 47708

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
i
ii
1
2
4
5
5
5
15
19
23
25
29
32
33
33
33
39
44
Proxy Statement
We have provided you with this Notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement because the Board of Directors of OneMain Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “OneMain”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 13, 2022. This proxy statement contains information about the items to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and information about the Company. Instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report to Stockholders on the Internet or paper copies of this proxy statement and the Annual Report are first being sent or given to stockholders on or about April 29, 2022.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Message to Our Stockholders
April 8, 2019

29, 2022​

Dear Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I amfellow stockholders:

We are pleased to invite you to attend our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held on May 21, 2019June 13, 2022 at 1:3:00 p.m., local time, Central Time, at the Old Vanderburgh County Courthouse, 201our offices located at 601 NW 4thSecond Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708 (the “Annual Meeting”). Details regarding the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting, proxy voting and other information about how to participate are more fully described in the accompanying materials.

this proxy statement. Please read it carefully.

Your vote is important to us. Whether or not you are planning to attend the meeting, in person, it is importantwe encourage you to submit your proxy promptly so that your sharesvotes will be represented and voted. represented.
In addition to voting in person, stockholders of record may vote via a toll-free telephone number or over2021, we delivered strong financial results amidst the Internet. Stockholders who request a paper copyongoing impact of the Proxy StatementCOVID-19 pandemic and 2018 Annual Reportcontinued to support our team members and our businesses to deliver substantial long-term value for our stockholders. Our management team focused on actions to support our mission of improving the financial well-being of hardworking Americans with a vision to be the partner of choice for the non-prime consumer, solving financial needs and enabling progress toward a better future. These strategic priorities helped us to continue positioning for the future, optimizing the business to accommodate future growth, maintaining and strengthening the balance sheet and driving our mission as a socially responsible company.
Throughout the year, the Board oversaw the development and execution of OneMain’s strategic plans, including investments in innovative offerings that will deepen engagement with customers and communities. Those investments included: the development of new partner distribution channels, which have already contributed to our growth; the launch of differentiated credit cards BrightWay and BrightWay+, which reward customers for good payment habits; the acquisition and integration of Trim, our customer-focused financial wellness FinTech platform; the issuance of our inaugural Social Bond, which furthers our commitment to financial inclusion with net proceeds of the issuance serving credit-disadvantaged communities around the country; the entry into a $4 million service contract with EVERFI, a global social-impact technology provider, to develop and distribute free, digital financial education to 1,500 high schools nationwide by mail maythe end of 2022; the institution of a number of new benefits for team members, including paid time off for vaccinations, child care benefits, enhanced coverage of health care costs, flexible scheduling and an employee stock purchase plan; continued support of customers through the extension of borrower’s assistance programs; and providing credit access to a consumer segment that is generally underserved by the traditional banking system.
Our ability to drive stockholder value and provide continued support to our customers and the communities where we are engaged depends on the success of our team members. OneMain is committed to a diverse, creative and inclusive work environment where all team members thrive. By promoting a diverse workforce, we are focusing on supporting a talent pool that reflects and celebrates the communities we serve. Our commitment to diversity begins with our Board, 50 percent of which is ethnically diverse and 25 percent of which is gender diverse. Together, we also votecontinue to take important steps to promote sustainability and reduce our environmental impact, including efforts to reduce our carbon footprint, improve awareness, enhance reporting and serve those impacted by completing, signingcritical social issues.
We look forward to continuing to deliver value to our customers, stockholders and mailingstakeholders. On behalf of the enclosed proxy card promptly inentire Board, we thank you for your support of the return envelope provided. You can, of course, vote in person at the meeting but you are encouraged to send in the proxy card, or vote online or by telephone, to ensure your vote is counted should you be unable to attend for any reason. You may revoke your proxyBoard and vote in person at the meeting if you choose to do so.

OneMain.
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_dougshulman-bw.jpg]
Sincerely,[MISSING IMAGE: sg_royaguthrie-bw.jpg]

Douglas H.Doug Shulman
President &Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Roy A. Guthrie
Lead Independent Director

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019: This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 are available on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC.

Notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date and TimeJune 13, 2022
3:00 p.m. Central Time
Place601 NW Second Street
Evansville, Indiana 47708

April 8, 2019

NOTICE OF THE
2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date and Time:
May 21, 2019
1:00 p.m., local time
Place:
Old Vanderburgh County Courthouse
201 NW 4th Street
Evansville, Indiana 47708
47708*
Meeting Agenda
Meeting Agenda:
1.
A proposal to[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg] To elect three Class III directors, Valerie Soranno Keating, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith, to serve until the 20222025 Annual Meeting and until such director’s successor has been elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.
2.
A proposal to[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg] To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for OneMain Holdings, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2019.2022.
3.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]Such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Record Date:Date
In order to
To vote, you must have been a stockholder at the close of business on March 28, 2019.April 21, 2022.
Voting Options
Voting by Proxy:
It is important thatYou have three options for submitting your shares be represented at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to attendvote before the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read this Proxy Statement and to complete, date and sign your proxyMeeting:

Internet, through computer or voting instruction card and return it promptlymobile device such as a tablet or vote your shares by telephonesmartphone;

Telephone; or by Internet, as described on the proxy card. You may revoke your proxy and vote in person at the meeting if you choose to do so.

Mail.
By order of the Board of Directors,

Jack R. Erkilla
Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel & Secretary

Please vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

[MISSING IMAGE: sg_jackrerkilla-bw.jpg]
Jack R. Erkilla
Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel and Secretary
April 29, 2022
*
If we determine that it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting as planned due to COVID-19 or other considerations, we will publicly announce alternative arrangements as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting in a different location or solely by means of remote communication (i.e., a virtual meeting). If you are planning to attend our Annual Meeting, please check our Investor Relations website at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com at least one week prior to the meeting date for any updated information.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal Year 2021 Performance Overview
Net Income
Earnings per Diluted ShareQuarterly Dividend
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-bc_earningspn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_uparrowpn.jpg]
Increase of 80%
over 2020
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_uparrowpn.jpg]
Increase of 82%
over 2020
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_uparrowpn.jpg]
Increase of 36%
over Q4 2021
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-fc_accountspn.jpg]
“We closed out a great 2021 with continued strong growth in receivables and on plan with an important credit card roll out. As we enter this year with good momentum, we remain focused on executing our key growth initiatives, driving robust stockholder returns and providing our customers with the products and services they need to help them progress to a better financial future.”
Doug Shulman
Chairman and CEO

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-fc_programpn.jpg]

1

ESG Overview
We are delivering on our customer-focused mission. As the nation’s largest non-prime lender, we pride ourselves in providing access to responsible lending solutions that help our customers meet their financial needs and improve their financial well-being.
Our approach is guided by our three priorities:
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-fc_prioritiespn.jpg]
Our approach to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices is a natural extension of our reputation as a responsible lender with a commitment to customer service. Whether we are supporting team members, strengthening our communities, limiting our environmental impact or maintaining sound governance practices, we are unwavering in our customer-focused mission. We are focused on expanding our ESG initiatives and disclosures. As part of these efforts, we formalized our Board’s oversight of ESG policies and practices and formed the ESG Leadership Council, which consists of a diverse group of five senior executives that coordinate internal resources and report to the Board on relevant ESG topics.
Key ESG Initiatives
Environmental
Committed to enhancing our sustainability reporting and disclosures to align to relevant frameworks and standards, including in our 2021 ESG Report, which will be published later this year

Building capacity to track our energy, water and waste

Implementing initiatives that reduce our impact on the environment

Founding investor in BlackRock’s environmentally responsible money market fund, Liquid Environmentally Aware Fund
Social
Issued inaugural Social Bond in 2021 that advances financial inclusion by providing responsible loans to credit-insecure and credit-at-risk communities, with a commitment that at least 75% of the loans are allocated to women and minority borrowers

Developing a Social Asset-Backed Securities offering in early 2022 allocated to rural communities with at least 75% to borrowers with net incomes of  $50,000 or less

Launched Credit Worthy by OneMain Financial, a free digital financial education curriculum in high schools across the country

Offer team members Continuing Professional Education via online training

Diversity Council led by top management to champion our inclusive culture

Disclosure of EEO-1 Report

Purchase and integration of Trim, a customer-focused financial wellness FinTech platform

Continuing commitment to diversity and inclusion in our banking and broker relationships

Partnering with affinity organizations to assist in recruiting a diverse workforce

Instituted new benefits for team members including paid time off for vaccinations and volunteer time, child care benefits, elder care and coverage of health care costs

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying materials are being made available to OneMain Holdings, Inc. stockholders beginning on or about April 8, 2019. In this Proxy Statement, “OMH” refers to OneMain Holdings, Inc., the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” may refer to OneMain Holdings, Inc. or to it and one or more of its subsidiaries, as the context may require, “OneMain” refers to the operations of OneMain Financial Holdings, LLC (the successor to OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc.) acquired from CitiFinancial Credit Company on November 15, 2015, “Springleaf” refers to OMH and its operations other than OneMain, “SFI” refers to Springleaf Finance, Inc., and “SFC” refers to Springleaf Finance Corporation. This Proxy Statement contains information to assist you in voting your shares on the matters to be presented at the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on May 21, 2019.

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

What is the purpose of this Proxy Statement?

The purpose of this Proxy Statement is to provide information regarding matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Additionally, it contains certain information that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) require the Company to provide to its stockholders. This Proxy Statement is also the document used by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) to solicit proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders an opportunity to vote on the matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting, even if they cannot attend the meeting.

Who pays the cost of soliciting proxies?

We are making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes. If you choose to access the proxy materials over the Internet, you are responsible for Internet access charges you may incur. If you choose to vote by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur. The solicitation of proxies or votes may be made by mail, in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by our directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We also will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders.

How is the Company distributing proxy materials?

We are providing access to our proxy materials primarily over the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder. On or about April 8, 2019, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Notice tells you how to:

view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, including this proxy statement and the OneMain Holdings, Inc. 2018 Annual Report, on the Internet and vote; and
Key ESG Initiatives
Governance

Added three new directors to the Board in 2021 and early 2022

Enhanced Board diversity, with 50% of directors diverse by ethnicity and 25% diverse by gender

Rotated chair of the Compensation Committee in 2021

Added comprehensive director-specific skills matrix to the proxy statement to highlight the skills and experience most relevant to our business and strategy

Formalized Board oversight of ESG by updating the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter to highlight committee’s oversight of policies and practices relating to ESG matters

Amended the Risk Committee charter to highlight committee’s oversight of cybersecurity, information security and data privacy
instruct us to send proxy materials to you by mail or email.
3

You may also request delivery of an individual copy of the Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report by contacting us by mail at OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Attention: Secretary or by calling our Investor Relations department at (475) 619-8821.

1

When and where will

Voting Overview
This section summarizes information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. These highlights do not contain all the Annual Meeting be held?

The meeting will be held on May 21, 2019, at the Old Vanderburgh County Courthouse, 201 NW 4th Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, beginning at 1:00 p.m., local time. Stockholders may obtain directions to the locationinformation that you should consider before voting or provide a complete description of the meeting by contacting the Company’s Secretary at 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Telephone: (812) 424-8031.

What is the structure of our Board of Directors?

Our Board consists of nine members divided evenly into three classes. Each class serves a three year term. Three Class III directors are up for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

What matters will the stockholders vote on at the meeting?

You will be voting on the following:

totopics covered. Please read this entire proxy statement before voting.
Proposal 1
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg] The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal
To elect three Class III directors, Valerie Soranno Keating, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith, to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting and until such director’s successor has been elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.Additional information can be found on page 5
Proposal 2
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg] The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for OneMain Holdings, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2022.Additional information can be found on page 59
Stockholders will also attend to such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
4

Corporate Governance
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
The terms of the Class III directors, consisting of Valerie Soranno Keating, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith, will expire at the Annual Meeting. Each incumbent Class III director has been nominated by the Board to serve untilas a continuing director for a new three-year term expiring at the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until such director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal (the “Director Election Proposal”);removal.
In determining whether to ratifynominate each of the appointmentClass III directors for another term, the Board considered the factors discussed below under “Corporate Governance — The Board of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP asDirectors — Selection of Director Nominees” and concluded that each possesses the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm fortalents, backgrounds, perspectives, attributes and skills that will enable them to continue to provide valuable insights to Company management and play an important role in helping the year ending December 31, 2019 (the “Ratification of Auditors Proposal”);Company achieve its goals and objectives.
to consider and act upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Matters to be voted on at
The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the Annual Meeting
BOARD
RECOMMENDATION
1.
Director Election Proposal
Forelection of each of the three nominees
named in this Proxy Statement listed above for director.
The Board of Directors
Name and Principal OccupationDirector SinceCommittee Memberships
2.[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dougomf1-4c.jpg]
RatificationDouglas H. Shulman
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Auditors ProposalOneMain Holdings, Inc.
2018Executive
FOR[MISSING IMAGE: ph_guthrie1-4c.jpg]
Roy A. Guthrie
Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Discover Financial Services
2012Audit (Chair)
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
Risk
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_philbronner1-4c.jpg]
Philip L. Bronner
Co-founder of Ardent Venture Partners
2021Audit
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_phylliscaldwell1-4c.jpg]
Phyllis R. Caldwell
Founder of Wroxton Civic Ventures LLC
2021Compliance
Nominating and Corporate
Governance (“NCG”)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_toosdaruvala1-4clr.jpg]
Toos N. Daruvala
Senior Partner Emeritus of McKinsey & Company
2022Compliance
Risk

Who may vote at the meeting?

All stockholders who owned shares of Company common stock at the close of business on the record date of March 28, 2019 may attend and vote at the meeting.

How do I vote?

You can vote either in person at the meeting or by proxy whether you attend the meeting or not. You can vote by telephone or Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you are a registered holder of shares of Company common stock, you can also vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card. If you hold your shares of Company common stock beneficially in street name, you may submit proxies by following the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee see “What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in ‘street name’?” below for more information. If you sign your proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted as the Board recommends. The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Monday, May 20, 2019. If you are a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person.

5


2

What is householding?

If you and others who share your mailing address own Company common stock through bank or brokerage accounts, you may have received a notice that your household will receive only one copy of the Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report or Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce the volume of duplicate information and reduce printing and postage costs. You may discontinue householding by contacting your bank or broker.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are a stockholder of record. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or similar institution, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.”
Name and Principal OccupationDirector SinceCommittee Memberships
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_valeriesoranno1-4c.jpg]
Valerie Soranno Keating
Senior Advisor to Private Equity Firms and Former Chief Executive Officer of Barclaycard
2018Compliance (Chair)
Risk
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_aneekmamik1-4c.jpg]
Aneek S. Mamik
Partner and Global Co-Head at Värde Partners, Inc.
2018Compensation
Executive
NCG
Risk (Chair)
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_rsmith1-4c.jpg]
Richard A. Smith
Retired Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Realogy Holdings Corp.
2018Audit
Compensation
NCG (Chair)

The institution holding your account is considered the stockholder of recordindividuals nominated for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct the institution on how to vote the shares held in your account.

What is the effect of abstentions and broker “non-votes”?

The inspector will treat valid proxies marked “abstain” or proxies required to be treated as broker “non-votes” as present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the Annual Meeting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when you fail to provide your broker with voting instructions on a particular proposal and the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on that particular proposal because the proposal is not a “routine” matter under the applicable rules. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the Director Election Proposal will have no effect on the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the Ratification of Auditors Proposal will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

Unless your broker receives appropriate instructions from you, your broker may not use discretionary authority to vote your shares on any of the matters to be consideredre-election at the Annual Meeting other thanand our continuing directors possess the ratificationskills and qualifications needed to effectively oversee OneMain’s operations. Our directors have diverse backgrounds and experiences and have demonstrated a commitment to strong corporate governance, stockholder engagement and sustainability.

Board Snapshot
Director Diversity and Tenure
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-pc_directorpn.jpg]
Board Qualifications and Skills
Our directors have significant business experience in key areas of our independent registered public accounting firm. Therefore, we strongly urge youoperations that allow them to vote your shares.

Can I change my voting instructions before the meeting?

You may revoke your proxy by sending in a signed proxy cardeffectively fulfill their oversight responsibilities with a later date, providing subsequent telephone or Internet voting instructions, providing a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at the address on page 1 prior to the Annual Meeting or attending the Annual Meeting to cast your vote in person. If your shares are held in “street name,” please follow the directions given by the institution that holds your shares to change or revoke your voting instructions.

Is my vote confidential?

We keep all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations confidential as a matter of practice. We permit only our inspector of election to examine these documents. If you write comments on your proxy card or ballot, the proxy card or ballot may be forwardedrespect to our management and strategy. Our directors possess a broad range of qualifications, skills and viewpoints that are important to their oversight responsibilities, including financial industry, risk management, accounting and financial reporting, corporate governance and cybersecurity. Our directors also have personal traits such as integrity, character and sound business judgment that are essential to effective corporate governance.

Listed below are the Board to review your comments.

How many votes do I have?

You will have one voteskills and experience that we consider important for our directors in light of our current business and structure. The directors’ biographies note each share of Company common stock which you owned at the close of business on March 28, 2019, the record date for the meeting.

director’s relevant experience, qualifications and skills in these key areas.

6

3

Who

Key Qualifications and Skills for OneMain Directors
Accounting and Auditing. Experience overseeing the preparation of financial statements and the design and implementation of internal control over financial reporting or auditing public company financial statements facilitates oversight of public company reporting.
Consumer Finance. Experience with retail banking, consumer lending and finance, consumer loans or credit cards provides knowledge of the risks and opportunities that can impact our business and a detailed understanding of consumers.
Corporate Governance and Responsibility. Experience with corporate governance matters including board and management accountability, assessing or overseeing risk management and a deep understanding of ESG-related practices that align with the interests of investors and other stakeholders ensures proper oversight and protection of stakeholders’ interests.
Finance and Capital Markets. Experience with capital and credit markets, financing and funding operations assists our directors in understanding, advising on and overseeing our capital structure, financing, capital allocation and investing activities.
Government, Legal and Regulatory. Public policy and public service experience in government agencies, non-governmental organizations or non-profit associations provides insights that help the Company work constructively with federal, state and local lawmakers and policymakers and experience with understanding legal and regulatory environments and frameworks assists the Board in fulfilling its compliance oversight responsibilities.
Human Capital Management. Experience with managing and developing a workforce, managing compensation, overseeing inclusion and diversity efforts, implementing succession planning and talent management and managing other human capital initiatives helps to align our organization’s culture.
Public Company Board Experience. Experience as a director on other public company boards of directors provides valuable perspective and oversight experience.
Risk Management. Experience assessing risk management at a large organization, including risks arising from regulation, cybersecurity and data privacy concerns, provides valuable knowledge and guidance to the Board and enhances its ability to conduct effective oversight of significant risks facing the Company.
Senior Executive Leadership. Experience in a leadership role, including CEO, CFO or as another executive-level manager, provides experience and perspective to advise and oversee the performance of our management team.
Technology and Innovation. Experience with digital, technological and financial technology trends and changes, disruptive innovation and technological investment provides valuable knowledge and guidance to the Board.
7

Director Skills Matrix
The following matrix identifies the primary skills that the NCG Committee and the Board considered in connection with our director nominees. This high level summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each director nominee’s contributions to the Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-fc_matrixpn.jpg]
8

Director Biographies
The principal occupation, age and certain other information for each director nominee and the continuing directors serving unexpired terms are set forth below.
Class III Director Nominees — Terms expire in 2022
Valerie Soranno Keating, age 58
Ms. Keating has been senior advisor to a number of private equity firms in the U.S. and Europe since 2017. From November 2009 through May 2015, she was the Chief Executive Officer of Barclaycard, the global payments division of Barclays PLC (“Barclays”), with $60 billion in assets and over 30 million customers throughout the U.S., Europe and South Africa. Businesses in the Barclaycard portfolio included consumer credit, charge and prepaid cards, digital and in-store sales finance, commercial payments, online personal loans, online deposits, digital merchant offers, wearable payment devices and merchant acquisition.
Before joining Barclays, Ms. Keating held a variety of executive positions at American Express Company from May 1993 through May 2009, including President, Travelers Cheques & Prepaid Services; Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Services; Executive Vice President, Global Merchant Services, Emerging Global Businesses & Network Expansion; and Vice President, Corporate Strategic Planning. Prior to that, she was a management consultant at Kearney, Inc. from September 1985 through July 1991 and at the Amherst Group Limited from July 1991 through May 1993. Ms. Keating has served on the board of CPI Card Group Inc. (where she is also Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee) since May 2018 and Finserv Acquisition Corp. II (where she is also a member of the Audit Committee) since February 2021.
Qualifications and Skills. Ms. Keating’s success as the Chief Executive Officer of Barclaycard, as well as her many years of experience in and knowledge of the consumer finance industry, led the Board to determine that she is qualified to continue serving as a director and that she should be nominated for re-election to the Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_valeriesoranno1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2018
Committees
Compliance (Chair)
Risk
9

Aneek S. Mamik,
age 43
Mr. Mamik is a partner and Global Co-Head of Värde Partners, Inc. (“Värde”). He oversees credit and equity investments in consumer finance, commercial finance, as well as other sectors of specialty lending. Mr. Mamik is a member of the firm’s investment committee. Based in New York, he joined Värde in 2016, initially as Head of Financial Services for North America.
Prior to joining Värde, Mr. Mamik spent 15 years at General Electric, where he most recently led mergers and acquisitions for GE Capital Headquarters (“GE Capital”). He led the initial public offering and subsequent $20 billion stock split off of Synchrony Financial. Mr. Mamik pursued acquisitions globally as part of GE Capital’s expansion and led some of the largest transactions in specialty finance. While at GE Capital, Mr. Mamik also had senior executive experience in capital allocation, strategy and finance across consumer and commercial lending.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Mamik’s extensive experience in the consumer finance industry, private equity experience, and familiarity with the Company led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director and that he should be nominated for re-election to the Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_aneekmamik1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2018
Committees
Risk (Chair)
Compensation
Executive
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Richard A. Smith,
age 68
Mr. Smith is the retired Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Realogy Holdings Corp. (“Realogy”), which at the time of his retirement was a global leader in residential real estate franchising with company-owned real estate brokerage operations, as well as relocation, title and settlement services. Prior to his retirement in December 2017, Mr. Smith led Realogy’s business operations for 21 years. Under Mr. Smith’s leadership, Realogy was recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by Ethisphere Institute for seven consecutive years.
Mr. Smith is a former member of the Business Roundtable, an association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies, a former commissioner on the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Housing Commission, and previously served on the Executive Committee of the Policy Advisory Board for Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.
Mr. Smith has served as a director and member of the Audit, Nominating and Compensation Committees of TZP Strategies Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, since January 2021. In addition, Mr. Smith was a member of the board of directors of Total Systems Services, Inc., a NYSE-listed company headquartered in Columbus, Georgia, prior to its 2019 merger with Global Payments Network, a NYSE-listed company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Smith’s experience and success as a chief executive officer of a public company led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director and that he should be nominated for re-election to the Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_rsmith1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2018
Committees
Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)
Audit
Compensation
10

Class I Directors — Terms expire in 2023
Phyllis R. Caldwell,
age 62
Ms. Caldwell currently serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of Ocwen Financial Corp., a non-bank mortgage servicer and originator, where she has served as a director since January 2015. She is founder and managing member of Wroxton Civic Ventures, LLC, which provides advisory services on various financial, housing and economic development matters, a position she has held since January 2012. She currently serves on the board of JBG Smith Properties, a position she has held since March 2021. In addition, she was elected to the board of Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation, a business development company, effective December 31, 2021. She served on the board of Revolution Acceleration Acquisition Corp, a special purpose acquisition corporation, from December 2020 to July 2021. From January 2014 to September 2018, Ms. Caldwell served as a director and member of the Audit Committee of American Capital Senior Floating, Ltd., a business development company.
Previously, Ms. Caldwell was Chief Homeownership Preservation Officer at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, responsible for oversight of the U.S. housing market stabilization, economic recovery and foreclosure prevention initiatives, from November 2009 to December 2011.
In addition, Ms. Caldwell held various leadership roles in commercial real estate finance during her eleven years at Bank of America until her retirement from Bank of America in 2007, serving most recently as President of Community Development Banking. From January 2014 until March 2021, Ms. Caldwell served as an independent director of City First Bank of DC.
Qualifications and Skills. Ms. Caldwell’s extensive experience in the housing and financial services industries, both in the private sector and as a senior government official, and her experience as a board member of other public companies in the financial services industry led the Board to determine that she is qualified to continue serving as a director.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_phylliscaldwell1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2021
Committees
Compliance
Nominating and Corporate Governance
11

Roy A. Guthrie,
age 69
Mr. Guthrie has served as our Lead Independent Director since the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Discover Financial Services (“Discover”), a direct banking and payment services company, from 2005 through April 2011. He retired from Discover in January 2012. Prior to joining Discover, Mr. Guthrie was President and Chief Executive Officer of CitiFinancial International, LTD, a consumer finance business of Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”), from 2000 to 2004. In addition, Mr. Guthrie served on Citigroup’s management committee during this period of time. Mr. Guthrie also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of CitiCapital from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Guthrie served as Chief Financial Officer of Associates First Capital Corporation, a consumer finance lender, from 1996 to 2000, while it was a public company, and served as a member of its board of directors from 1998 to 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Guthrie served in various positions at Associates First Capital Corporation, including Corporate Controller from 1989 to 1996.
In addition, Mr. Guthrie has served as a director and member of the Audit Committee of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc., a residential mortgage loan originator and servicer, and its successor, Mr. Cooper Group Inc., since February 2012. He has served as a director and Chairman of the Risk Committee of Synchrony Financial, a private label credit card issuer, since July 2014. In addition, he has served as a director of Cascade Acquisition Corp. since its initial public offering in November 2020. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Renovate America, Inc. from October 2017 through December 2020.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Guthrie’s experience as a chief financial officer of two publicly traded companies, his vast experience with and knowledge of the consumer finance industry, his experience and background in finance and accounting, and his experience as a director and executive officer of publicly traded companies led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_guthrie1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2012
Committees
Audit (Chair)
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
Risk
Class II Directors — Terms expire in 2024
Philip L. Bronner,
age 51
Mr. Bronner is the co-founder of Ardent Venture Partners and is an investor in Method Financial and Collective. Before co-founding Ardent Venture Partners, Mr. Bronner was a founder and managing member of Summer League Ventures. Prior to Summer League Ventures, Mr. Bronner was a General Partner with Novak Biddle Venture Partners. Over the course of his career, Mr. Bronner has led 16, and was actively involved in 20, investments, totaling over $100 million. Mr. Bronner was the founder of Quad Learning, a venture-backed startup acquired by Wellspring Higher Education, served as a management consultant at McKinsey & Co. (“McKinsey”) and worked as a software engineer at IBM.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Bronner’s experience as an active investor in financial technology companies and cloud software-based businesses led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_philbronner1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2021
Committees
Audit
12

Toos N. Daruvala,
age 66
Mr. Daruvala joined McKinsey in 1983, was elected Senior Partner in 1995, and retired from the firm in 2015. At McKinsey, Mr. Daruvala led the Americas Risk Management Practice, the Americas Banking and Securities Practice and the build-out of McKinsey’s global Risk Advanced Analytics capability. Over the course of his career, he worked with financial services institutions on a broad range of strategic and operational matters. From 2016 to 2021, he was co-Chief Executive Officer of MIO Partners, an investment company.
Mr. Daruvala currently serves on the board of the Royal Bank of Canada and previously served as the Chairman of the Risk Committee. He served on the board of Cardconnect Corp., a provider of payment processing and technology services, from April to July 2017. He is an adjunct professor and Executive-in-Residence at Columbia Business School.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Daruvala’s experience in financial services, risk, data and analytics led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_toosdaruvala1-4clr.jpg]
Director Since 2022
Committees
Compliance
Risk
Douglas H. Shulman,
age 54
Mr. Shulman joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) in September 2018 and has served as Chairman of the Board since January 2021. He has significant experience managing large, complex organizations at the intersection of financial services, data and technology. He came to the Company from BNY Mellon, a global investments company, where he served as Senior Executive Vice President, Global Head of Client Service Delivery from 2014 to 2018 and was a member of the Executive Committee. Prior to BNY Mellon, he was a Senior Advisor at McKinsey from 2013 to 2014.
From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Shulman served as the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, where he directed a transformation of the agency’s technology, drove customer service metrics to historic levels and led important breakthroughs in addressing international tax evasion. Previously, Mr. Shulman was Vice Chairman and, before that, President of Markets, Services and Information at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and its predecessor company, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., when it owned the Nasdaq Stock Market and the American Stock Exchange.
Earlier in his career, Mr. Shulman was an entrepreneur, a vice president at a private investment firm and part of the founding team that launched Teach for America, a national non-profit that places teachers in low-income communities.
Qualifications and Skills. Mr. Shulman’s experience in the financial services industry and government and his experience as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer led the Board to determine that he is qualified to continue serving as a director.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_dougomf1-4c.jpg]
Director Since 2018
Committees
Executive
Director Independence
The Board has affirmatively determined that Philip L. Bronner, Phyllis R. Caldwell, Toos N. Daruvala, Roy A. Guthrie, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith qualify as independent under Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) corporate governance listing standards. In addition, the Board previously determined that our former directors, Lisa Green Hall, Peter B. Sinensky and Matthew R. Michelini qualified as independent under NYSE listing standards. In making its independence determinations, the Board considers
13

the specific tests for independence included in the NYSE listing standards. The Board considers whether directors have a material relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of directors. When assessing materiality, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including transactions between the Company and the director, family members of directors and organizations with which the director is affiliated. The Board further considers the frequency of and dollar amounts associated with these transactions and whether the transactions were in the ordinary course of business and were consummated on terms and conditions similar to those with unrelated parties. The Board has determined that Valerie Soranno Keating does not qualify as an independent director under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards due to compensation she received in November 2020 in recognition of services provided in helping the Company develop credit card offerings.
In affirmatively determining the independence of any director who will tabulate and countserve on the votes?

Representatives or agents of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulateCompensation Committee, the votes and act asBoard also specifically considers factors relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to the Company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in making judgments about the Company’s inspectorexecutive compensation, including sources of election.

How many sharesthe director’s compensation and relationships of stock arethe director to the Company or senior management.

Selection of Director Nominees
Although the Board retains ultimate responsibility for nominating members for election to the Board, the NCG Committee of the Board conducts the initial screening and evaluates individual directors at least annually. We regularly assess the composition of our Board and consider the results as part of our assessment process and nomination process. As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, director nominees, including those directors eligible to votestand for re-election, are selected based on, among other things, the following factors:

whether the nominee has demonstrated, by significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make meaningful contributions to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of the Company;

the nominee’s reputation for honesty and ethical conduct in his or her personal and professional activities;

the nominee’s experiences, skills and expertise;

diversity considerations;

the nominee’s business judgment;

the nominee’s impact on the composition of the Board;

requirements of applicable laws and NYSE listing standards;

the nominee’s time availability and dedication; and

the nominee’s potential conflicts of interest.
The NCG Committee recommends the nomination of directors who represent different qualities and attributes and a mix of professional and personal backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and oversight of our business and strategy. Diversity is one of the factors that the NCG Committee considers in identifying director nominees, including diversity of thought, educational and professional background, gender, race, age, sexual orientation and ethnic or national background.
We are committed to regular Board refreshment. Since the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, three directors have departed and three new independent directors have been appointed to the Board. We provide new directors with a director orientation program to familiarize such directors with, among other things, our business, strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, compliance programs, conflicts policies, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”), Corporate Governance Guidelines, executive officers, internal auditors and independent auditors.
14

In conducting the screening and evaluation of potential director nominees, the NCG Committee considers candidates recommended by directors and the Company’s management, as well as recommendations from Company stockholders. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”), include procedures for stockholders to nominate candidates to serve on the Board for election at any Annual Meeting or at any special meeting called for the purpose of electing directors. As a result, the NCG Committee has not implemented a separate policy with regard to such procedures since stockholders may submit recommendations for director candidates by following the procedures set forth in the Bylaws.
It is the general policy of the Company, as set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, that no director having attained the age of 75 years will stand for re-election. In connection with each director nomination recommendation, the NCG Committee considers the issue of continuing director tenure and takes appropriate steps to ensure that the Board maintains an openness to new ideas and a willingness to critically re-examine the status quo.
Stockholder Nominations
The Bylaws require a stockholder who desires to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at an annual meeting of stockholders to timely submit certain information to Secretary, OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708. This information includes, among other things:

the stockholder’s name and address, and the class, series and number of shares that he or she beneficially owns;

a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting;

the name, address and certain other information regarding the stockholder’s nominee for director;

a description of any arrangement or understanding between the stockholder and the director nominee or any other person (naming such person(s)) in connection with the making of such nomination to the Board; and

a completed questionnaire with respect to the prospective nominee’s background and the background of any other person on whose behalf the nomination is being made, and certain written representations and agreements from such persons concerning their independence and compliance with applicable laws.
To be timely, a stockholder must submit the information required by the Bylaws not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days in advance of the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of stockholders. The By-laws include special notice provisions if no annual meeting was held in the previous year or if the Annual Meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the preceding Annual Meeting.
Board Responsibilities
Overview
Our business is managed by our team members under the direction and oversight of the Board. Among other responsibilities discussed below, the Board reviews, monitors and, where appropriate, approves fundamental financial and business strategies and major corporate actions. The Board is elected by stockholders to provide advice and counsel to and oversee management to ensure that the interests of our stockholders and other corporate constituents are being served with a view toward maximizing our long-term value.
Directors exercise their oversight responsibilities through discussions with management, review of materials management provides to them, visits to our offices and facilities, and their participation in Board and committee meetings.
15

Risk Oversight
While management is responsible for day-to-day risk management of the Company’s operations, the Board is responsible for overseeing enterprise-wide risks. The Board uses its standing committees (discussed below) to monitor and address risk management within the scope of each committee’s expertise or charter.
Committee Roles in Risk Oversight
Audit CommitteeRisk Committee

Oversees the financial statements, accounting and auditing functions and related risk

Responsible for engagement, compensation and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm

Oversees the development and implementation of systems and processes to identify, manage and mitigate reasonably foreseeable material risks to the Company

Assists the Board and its committees in fulfilling their responsibilities for risk management, including cybersecurity and data privacy risks
Compliance CommitteeCompensation Committee

Oversees legal and regulatory compliance matters

Monitors regulatory risks and ensures that there are appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address them

Oversees the Company’s compensation programs, including goals, objectives, performance and compensation for our CEO and other executive officers

Oversees compensation disclosure in this proxy statement
NCG Committee

Oversees director qualifications, Board structure and our director nomination process

Oversees corporate governance matters, including our policies and practices relating to corporate responsibility, including ESG matters
In addition to getting information from its committees, the Board also receives updates directly from members of management.
Environmental, Social and Governance Responsibility
Our approach to ESG is a natural extension of our reputation as a responsible lender with a track record of superb customer service. Whether we are supporting team members, strengthening communities, limiting our environmental impact or maintaining sound governance practices, we are unwavering in our customer-focused mission. We identify where we can have the most impact, collectively and individually, and make sure each team member is equipped to inspire and influence others to live and work responsibly.
The Board oversees sustainability and ESG matters, including our approach to key ESG risks. The NCG Committee also oversees and reviews with the Board the Company’s policies and practices relating to ESG matters and discusses with management reports on the Company’s progress and reporting on ESG-related matters and communications with investors and other stakeholders regarding these matters. This oversight responsibility was recently formalized through an update to the NCG Committee charter.
In 2021, we issued our second ESG Report, which updates stakeholders on the progress that we made on our ESG initiatives in 2020. Our 2020 ESG Report is available on our website in the “About Us” section. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. Highlights of our ESG program and initiatives are included on pages 2 and 3 of this proxy statement. We are also focused on enhancing our ESG reporting and disclosures to align to relevant frameworks and standards, including in our forthcoming 2021 ESG Report.
16

Human Capital Management
OneMain’s commitment to our communities starts with recruiting, developing and supporting approximately 8,800 team members that reflect and celebrate the customers we serve. A diverse talent pool and inclusive work environment makes us stronger and helps us fulfill our mission to improve the financial well-being of hardworking Americans. Acting with integrity, transparency and respect are at the heart of our success, and these ethical values inform our interactions with customers and with each other.
The Compensation Committee oversees and regularly engages with our senior management on a broad range of human capital management topics, including diversity and inclusion, employee engagement feedback, talent management and compensation and benefits.
OneMain’s Diversity Council is led by our CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer, and consists of 12 other team members representing a wide range of roles and geographies. The Diversity Council provides thought leadership, champions our culture of inclusion and supports diversity initiatives across the organization. We require diverse candidate slates for leadership roles and have established partnerships with external organizations to help recruit a diverse workforce. We require all team members to participate in diversity training. This commitment to diversity begins with our Board, whose membership includes 50% ethnic or racial minorities and 25% women.
In 2021, we reinforced our commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace by announcing career development and mentoring programs for underrepresented groups, including high-potential women and people of color. We increased diverse recruitment and hiring practices, updated our application process to be gender inclusive and enhanced companywide training. The Company’s 2021 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Report (EEO-1) is available on our investor relations website, further demonstrating our commitment to accountability and transparency. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Our culture is driven by a dynamic team committed to our mission and values. All managers are accountable for attracting and retaining high-quality, diverse talent and creating a respectful, inclusive work environment as part of their goals and leadership attributes, and all managers have a diversity and inclusion goal included in their annual review. Each year, team members have the opportunity to provide candid feedback about their level of connection to the Company (engagement) and whether they have the tools and resources to succeed (enablement) in our Employee Engagement Survey. This information is shared with our Board and management. In 2021, 84% of team members participated in the Employee Engagement Survey.
We invest in our team members and believe training and professional development is critical to maintaining our talent competitiveness and providing best-in-class service for our customers. OneMain empowers team members at all levels of our organization with the tools and personal and professional support to further their careers. We conduct regular employee trainings, including Leadership Development, Continuing Professional Education and leadership development at each level. Team members are guided through their performance management with regular goal setting and coaching.
Our compensation and benefits package includes competitive pay, healthcare and retirement benefits and eligibility to participate in our employee stock purchase plan, as well as paid time off and holidays, parental leave, disability benefits, military leave, childcare and eldercare assistance and paid development and volunteer time off, along with other benefits and employee resources. We offer performance pay to reward outstanding performance and encourage career development.
In 2021, we reinforced our commitment to being a great place to work with a number of new and existing benefits focused on supporting the health and wellness of our team members. These included an activity reimbursement benefit, access to subsidized back-up child and elder care, classes focused on mental and physical fitness and nutrition, a smoking cessation program, virtual health and mental health visits and support for hybrid ways of working.
17

Cybersecurity Oversight
Cybersecurity, data protection and privacy are critically important for the Company to maintain the trust of our customers, team members and other stakeholders. Risks, regulations, legislative activity and litigation in these areas continue to increase worldwide. In response, the Company, overseen by the Board and its Risk Committee, regularly adapts its cybersecurity program to an evolving landscape of emerging threats, evaluates effectiveness of key security controls, and assesses best practices for cybersecurity. The Company’s cybersecurity program provides a framework for compliance with applicable privacy, data protection and cybersecurity laws and protection against known or evolving threats to the security or integrity of customer records and information, and against unauthorized access to or use of such information. Our regulators are increasingly focused on ensuring that these policies are adequate to address consumer privacy rights and appropriately safeguard their personal information.
In addition to regular communication with the Risk Committee, at least annually, the Chief Information Security Officer provides a cybersecurity report to the Board to inform them of the general state of the Company’s cybersecurity program. The report covers the following, but not limited to, the cybersecurity posture, threat environment, material cybersecurity risks and events, cybersecurity program improvements and effectiveness.
The following are some highlights of the Company’s cybersecurity program:

the Company did not experience a material cybersecurity incident or significant data breach in 2021;

the Company allocated additional people and technology resources to address increased cybersecurity threats from the expansion of our digital presence and product offerings, suppliers and vendors and internal threats due to intentional or unintentional human risk;

the Company hired new leadership talent for our cybersecurity team and engaged third-party subject matter expertise to mature our cybersecurity capabilities;

employees are required to abide by our information security and privacy policies;

employees are required to participate in formal cybersecurity training; and

the Company renewed its cyber liability insurance coverage.
The Company’s 2022 cybersecurity strategy is focused on improving our readiness to identify, detect and respond to cybersecurity threats (such as ransomware and phishing attacks) by maturing our cybersecurity resilience capabilities, incident response processes, vendor and supplier oversight and continuing to reduce human risk.
Management Succession Planning
Our Board considers the selection, retention and succession planning for our management team to be one of its most important priorities. Succession planning is discussed at regularly scheduled meetings, including in executive sessions of the Board. Our NCG Committee has primary responsibility for executive succession planning, including policies and guidelines regarding succession in the event of an emergency or the retirement of our CEO, which it then presents and makes recommendations to the full Board. Our Board discusses management succession with our CEO, including evaluation of potential internal candidates for succession and focus on particular individuals, as appropriate.
Stockholder Engagement
The Board values engagement and discussion with stockholders as part of our commitment to good governance. Since our 2021 Annual Meeting?

At the closeMeeting, we formalized an ESG-focused stockholder engagement program, in addition to our normal course investor relations outreach in connection with quarterly earnings calls, investor and industry conferences and analyst meetings. As part of business on March 28, 2019, there were a totalour ESG-focused outreach, we reached out to our top stockholders representing approximately 40% of 136,082,463 shares of Company common stock issued and outstanding and eligiblemet with all stockholders who accepted our invitation, representing 25% of shares outstanding. We have also

18

increasingly had conversations with other stakeholders on ESG-related topics, and reached out to vote at the Annual Meeting.

How many shares mustleading proxy advisory firms. This engagement helps us to understand stockholder priorities and perspectives, and the feedback from this dialogue is shared with our NCG Committee.

Conversations with stockholders covered a variety of governance and compensation-related topics, including:
Differentiated business
strategy and mission
Evolution of stockholder base
Board composition and
refreshment
Corporate responsibility and
sustainability
Workforce diversity and
inclusion
Executive compensation
program and philosophy
Corporate governance
practices
Board Structure
Board Classes
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”) provides that the Board shall consist of not less than three and not more than eleven directors, as may be presentdetermined from time to holdtime by a majority of the Annual Meeting?

entire Board. Our Board consists of eight members divided into three classes. As of the date of this proxy statement, seven of the eight members of the Board are non-employee directors.

The Company’s Board is currently classified as follows:
ClassTerm ExpirationDirectors
Class III2022Valerie Soranno Keating
Aneek S. Mamik
Richard A. Smith
Class I2023Phyllis R. Caldwell
Roy A. Guthrie
Class II2024Philip L. Bronner
Toos N. Daruvala
Douglas H. Shulman
The Charter does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company common stock outstanding ascan elect all of the record datedirectors standing for election.
See also the discussion under the caption “Certain Relationships and entitledRelated Party Transactions — Consortium Transactions” below.
Lead Independent Director
Our Lead Independent Director provides robust independent Board leadership. The Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities include presiding over executive sessions of the independent directors and serving as an informal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and CEO.
The Lead Independent Director’s additional responsibilities include:

consulting with the Chairman and CEO regarding the content, information and schedules of meetings of the Board;
19


fostering an environment of open dialogue and constructive feedback among the independent directors;

providing feedback to vote at the Chairman and CEO regarding executive sessions of the independent directors;

facilitating the effective functioning of key committees;

ensuring the Board has the ability to provide input on long-term strategy;

participating in succession planning for senior management;

providing guidance on director succession and development; and

communicating with stockholders as necessary and after discussions with the Chairman and CEO.
Our Board appoints the Lead Independent Director annually. We regularly review our Board leadership structure and have concluded that this structure is currently in the best interest of our stockholders.
Mr. Guthrie has served as our Lead Independent Director since the 2014 Annual Meeting mustof Stockholders. The Company’s non-executive directors met in executive session without management four times in 2021.
Committees of the Board
The Board has five principal standing committees: the Audit, NCG, Compensation, Compliance and Risk Committees, as well as an Executive Committee. The Audit Committee, the NCG Committee and the Compensation Committee consist entirely of non-employee directors, and the Board has determined that each member of these committees is “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Members of the Compliance and Risk Committees are not required to be present, in personindependent directors. Each of the Board’s five principal standing committees operates pursuant to a written charter, and each such charter is available on our Investors Relations website at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com and is also available to stockholders upon written request, addressed to: Secretary, OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708.
Audit Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Roy A. Guthrie (Chair)

Philip L. Bronner

Richard A. Smith
The Board has determined that: (i) each member of the Audit Committee is “independent”; (ii) each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate”; and (iii) Mr. Guthrie is an “audit committee financial expert,” as such terms are defined under the Exchange Act or the NYSE listing standards, as applicable.
The Audit Committee met nine times in 2021.

Assisting the Board in its oversight of:

the integrity of the Company’s financial statements;

the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements, the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm and the evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance; and

the performance of the Company’s financial reporting process and internal audit function and whether to recommend to stockholders the appointment, retention or termination of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;

Reviewing, approving or ratifying related party transactions and other matters that may pose conflicts of interest;

Pre-approving all audit, audit-related and other services, if any, to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

Participating in the certification process relating to the filing of certain periodic reports pursuant to the Exchange Act and preparing the Report of the Audit Committee required under the proxy rules of the SEC to be included in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of stockholders.
20

Compensation Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Roy A. Guthrie (Chair)

Aneek S. Mamik

Richard A. Smith
The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. The “independent” directors who are appointed to the Compensation Committee are also “non-employee” directors, as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee met ten times in 2021.

Overseeing the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including its executive compensation plans and its material incentive-compensation and equity-based plans;

Evaluating annually the appropriate level of compensation for Board and committee service by non-employee directors;

Evaluating the performance of the President and CEO and other executive officers;

Reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement filed with the SEC;

Retaining and terminating compensation consultants as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and approving the terms of any such engagement; and

Preparing the Report of the Compensation Committee as required by the rules of the SEC.
Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of director compensation and executive compensation are set forth below under “Director Compensation — Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” respectively.
Compliance Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Valerie Soranno Keating (Chair)

Phyllis R. Caldwell

Toos N. Daruvala
The Compliance Committee met five times in 2021.

Overseeing the Company’s systems to comply with laws and regulations and related programs, policies and procedures, other than matters of financial reporting compliance, which are the responsibility of the Audit Committee; and

Assisting the Board in its oversight function with respect to:

ensuring that the Company has an effective compliance program;

monitoring regulatory risks and ensuring that there are appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address them;

the Company’s relationships with regulators; and

identifying changes to laws, regulations and best practices that may require changes to compliance programs or business practices.
Executive Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Douglas H. Shulman

Aneek S. Mamik

Roy A. Guthrie
The Executive Committee did not meet in 2021.

Serving as an administrative committee of the Board to act upon and facilitate the consideration by senior management and the Board of certain high-level business and strategic matters.
21

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Richard A. Smith (Chair)

Phyllis R. Caldwell

Aneek S. Mamik
The NCG Committee met nine times in 2021.

Identifying and recommending to the Board individuals qualified to serve as directors of the Company and on committees of the Board;

Advising the Board as to the Board’s composition, procedures and committees;

Developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and maintaining and updating such guidelines, as appropriate;

Overseeing the annual self-evaluation of the Board and its committees; and

Reviewing with the Board the Company’s ESG policies and practices and discussing with management reports on the Company’s progress and reporting on ESG-related matters and communications with investors and other stakeholders regarding these matters.
See “Corporate Governance — The Board of Directors — Selection of Director Nominees” above for more information about the process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director.
Risk Committee
MembersResponsibilities and Purposes

Aneek S. Mamik (Chair)

Toos N. Daruvala

Roy A. Guthrie

Valerie Soranno Keating
The Risk Committee met four times in 2021.

Overseeing the Company’s material risks, by:

overseeing the development and implementation of systems and processes designed to identify, manage and mitigate reasonably foreseeable material risks to the Company;

assisting the Board and the other Board committees in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities for the risk management functions of the Company; and

overseeing the development and implementation of appropriate enterprise-wide strategies and policies to identify, monitor, manage, control, timely report and mitigate material risks, including financial and non-financial, on and off-balance sheet, credit, cybersecurity, information security and data privacy risk, and current and contingent exposures.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The current members of the Compensation Committee are the individuals named as signatories to the Compensation Committee Report set forth under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — How We Make Compensation Decisions — Compensation Committee Report.” None of our executive officers currently serves as a member of the board of directors or as a member of a compensation committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of the Board or the Committee. None of the individuals who served on the Compensation Committee during 2021 and none of the current members of the Compensation Committee are current or former officers or employees of the Company. Additionally, none of the individuals who currently serve as members of the Compensation Committee or who served as members of the Compensation Committee during 2021 has had any relationship requiring disclosure by proxy, in order to hold the Company under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
22

Board and Governance Practices
Board, Committee and Annual Meeting Attendance
The Board held 11 meetings during 2021. Each director attended at least 75% of Board and conduct business. This is called a quorum. In determining whether a quorum is present, shares represented by votescommittee meetings held during the period he or she served. Directors are invited and encouraged, but are not required, to withhold, abstentions and broker non-votes will be deemed present atattend the Annual Meeting. Once a share is deemed present for any purpose atOne of the Company’s directors attended the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting itof Stockholders.
Board Evaluations
Each year the Board evaluates its own performance and those of its committees and individual directors and, as part of this process, solicits feedback from each director. Our NCG Committee is deemed present for quorum purposesresponsible for the remainder offormal evaluation process each year and sponsors the Annual Meeting.

How many votesself-assessment using surveys tailored to the Board and each committee that are required to elect directors and adopt other proposals?

Proposal 1—Director Election Proposal: Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of holders of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum is present. Accordingly, the three nominees named in this proxy statement with the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. Votes to withhold and broker non-votes, if any, will not have any effectbased on the election of a director.

Proposal 2—Ratification of Auditors Proposal: Approval of the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP asresponsibilities set forth in our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

Other business—All other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on any such other business.

How do I attend the Annual Meeting?

Admission to the Annual Meeting is limited to Company stockholders or their proxy holders. In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be asked to present proof of stock ownership and a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license. Proof of stock ownership may consist of the proxy card, or if shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee (“street name”), an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you beneficially owned shares of Company common stock at the close of business on March 28, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and report final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we intend to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Governing Documents

The following primary documents make up the Company’s corporate governance framework:

Corporate Governance Guidelines (“and the charters of the respective committees. The results of these surveys were discussed by the Board and committees, respectively, and the committee Chairs discuss the results of their respective committee surveys with the Board.
Governing Documents
The Corporate Governance Guidelines”Guidelines set forth the Company’s primary principles and policies regarding corporate governance. The Board reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are supplemented by our Code of Conduct and the Code of Ethics for Principal and Senior Financial Officers (the “Principal Officer Code”), as well as by policies and procedures addressing specific topics and practices.
On our website (www.onemainfinancial.com), after clicking on “Investor Relations” at the bottom of the webpage and then “Corporate Governance,” you can find, among other materials, the following documents relating to our governance framework:

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Audit Committee Charter

Compensation Committee Charter

Nominating and Corporate Governance (“NCG”) Committee Charter

Compliance Committee Charter

Risk Committee Charter

Code of Business ConductConduct; and Ethics (“Code of Conduct”)
Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers (“Principal Officer Code”)

These documents are accessible on the Company’s website at http://www.onemainfinancial.com/ by clicking on “Investor Relations” at the bottom of the webpage and then “Corporate Governance.” You also may obtain a free copy of any of these documents by sending a written request to OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Attention: Secretary. We intend to disclose any material amendments to or waivers of our Code of Conduct and Principal Officer Code requiring disclosure under applicable SEC or NYSE rules on our website within four business days of the date of any such amendment or waiver in lieu of filing a Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.05 thereof.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website as outlined above, set forth the Company’s primary principles and policies regarding corporate governance. The Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Governance Guidelines are supplemented by the Code of Conduct and the Principal Officer Code, as well as by policies and procedures addressing specific topics and practices.

Codes of Conduct

You also may obtain a free copy of any of these documents by sending a written request to our Secretary at OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708.
Code of Conduct
The Board adopted a Code of Conduct to help ensure that the Company abides by applicable laws and corporate governance standards. This code applies to all directors, employees and officers, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Principal Accounting Officer. The Board has also adopted a Principal Officer Code that applies to our CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code of Conduct and the Principal Officer Code are available on our website as outlined above.

Board Leadership Structure

Although not required, the Company has separated the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board. The CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and principal accounting officer. The Board has also adopted the Principal Officer Code, which applies to our CEO, CFO and principal accounting officer and requires that such officers, among other things, create a culture of high ethical standards and commitment to compliance and make full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures in accordance with applicable laws

23

and regulations. The Code of Conduct and the Principal Officer Code are available on our website as outlined above. We intend to disclose any material amendments to or waivers of our Code of Conduct and Principal Officer Code requiring disclosure under applicable SEC or NYSE rules on our website within four business days of the date of any such amendment or waiver in lieu of filing a Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.05 thereof.
Complaints and concerns relating to the Company’s accounting, financial reporting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters should be communicated to the Audit Committee of the Board. Any such communications may be made on an anonymous basis.
All complaints and concerns will be reviewed under the direction of the Audit Committee and overseen by the General Counsel and other appropriate persons as determined by the Audit Committee. The General Counsel also prepares a periodic summary report of all such communications for the Audit Committee.
24

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Consortium Transactions
On June 25, 2018, an investor group led by affiliates of Apollo Global Management and Värde (collectively the “Consortium”), through an acquisition entity (the “Acquisition Entity”), purchased approximately 40.5% of the Company’s then-outstanding common stock that had been owned indirectly by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group and its affiliates (the “Consortium Acquisition”). As a result of the Consortium Acquisition, the Consortium became our largest stockholder and had significant influence over all matters requiring a stockholder vote.
In connection with the closing of the Consortium Acquisition, the Company and the Acquisition Entity also entered into an amended and restated stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”), providing rights to the Acquisition Entity with respect to the designation of directors for nomination and election to the Board, as well as registration rights for certain of our securities owned by the Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement) (collectively, the “Stockholders”).
During 2021, the Consortium members sold an aggregate of 47,385,208 shares of our common stock through five secondary offerings (the “Consortium Transactions”). As a result of the Consortium Transactions and related transfers within the Consortium, Apollo and its affiliates are no longer members of the Consortium. Värde and its affiliates retained a portion of their shares and, and as of December 31, 2021, beneficially owned approximately 5.9% of our common stock. Prior to the secondary public offerings, the Consortium was entitled to designate six of our directors, as provided for in the Stockholders Agreement, all of whom were serving immediately after our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As of the date of this proxy statement, three of the six directors have resigned (all three of whom were employees of Apollo), and only Mr. Mamik (who is a partner of Värde) remains designated for service on our board by the Acquisition Entity under the terms of the Stockholders Agreement.
Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement
The Stockholders Agreement provides that we will vote in favor of, have the Board recommend to, and take all other reasonable actions within our control to, elect a certain number of director nominees based on the size of the Board and the number of shares held by the Acquisition Entity. As long as the Stockholders own shares representing between five and 10% of our voting power, the Acquisition Entity will have the right to designate service on our Board the number of directors required to maintain the Acquisition Entity’s proportional representation on the Board. The Acquisition Entity currently has the right to designate one such individual for service on our Board.
Under the Stockholders Agreement, the parties agreed to use reasonable efforts, including voting their respective shares, to ensure that no amendment is made to our Charter or Bylaws in effect as of the date of the Stockholders Agreement that would (i) add additional restrictions to the transferability of our shares by the Stockholders or (ii) nullify the rights of any Stockholder in the Stockholders Agreement without its approval.
We agreed to customary demand and piggyback registration rights for the Stockholders and to pay registration and offering-related expenses incidental to our performance under the Stockholders Agreement, and the applicable selling Stockholder agreed to pay its portion of all underwriting discounts, commissions and transfer taxes, if any, relating to the sale of its common stock under the Stockholders Agreement.
Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, we will indemnify the Acquisition Entity and related parties against losses arising out of third-party claims based on or in connection with the Acquisition Entity’s status as our equity holder, the ownership or operation of our assets or properties and the operation or conduct of our business, and any other activities we engage in. We also agreed to indemnify any selling Stockholder and related parties against any losses resulting from any untrue statement or omission of material fact in any registration statement or prospectus pursuant to which it sells shares of our common stock, unless such liability arose from such selling Stockholder’s misstatement or omission, and the applicable selling Stockholder agreed to indemnify us against all losses caused by its misstatements or omissions.
25

Transactions with Affiliates
Margin Loan Agreements. In December 2019, the Consortium informed us that it had undertaken to pledge all of its shares of our common stock pursuant to margin loan agreements and related documentation on a non-recourse basis. The Consortium informed us that the margin loan agreements contained customary default provisions, and in the event of an event of default thereunder, the lenders could foreclose upon any and all shares of our common stock pledged to them. In connection with the margin loan agreements, we delivered issuer agreements to the lenders in which we, among other things, made certain representations and warranties and agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to take any actions intended to hinder or delay the exercise of any remedies by the secured parties under the margin loan agreements and related documentation. In August 2021, Värde informed us that it was updating its margin loan arrangements with certain lenders and entering into an amendment to the margin loan agreement and we entered into a related amendment to our issuer agreement. In October 2021, Apollo repaid its margin loan in full and sold all of its shares of our common stock, after which it ceased being a member of the Consortium. As of December 31, 2021, the only shares that continue to be pledged are the approximately 5.9% of shares beneficially owned by Värde, representing an approximate 86% reduction of the shares initially pledged in 2019.
Except for the foregoing, which was approved by a special committee of the Board comprised of independent and disinterested directors, we are not a party to the margin loan agreements and related documentation and do not have obligations thereunder.
Stock Repurchases. In connection with Apollo’s secondary offerings in 2021, we repurchased 1,700,000 shares of our common stock in August 2021, at a purchase price of  $58.36 per share, and 1,870,000 shares of our common stock in October 2021, at a purchase price of  $53.45 per share, which in each case was the price at which the underwriter purchased the shares from Apollo and a discount to the last reported sale price of our common stock on the date prior to the commencement of the offering. The terms and conditions of these purchases were reviewed and approved by a special committee of the Board comprised of independent and disinterested directors.
Whole Loan Sale. In August 2021 we entered into a two-year whole loan sale flow agreement with entities affiliated with Värde, under which we agreed to sell $20 million of gross receivables per month. Prior to entering into the agreement, a special committee of the Board comprised of independent and disinterested directors reviewed and approved the addition of Värde to the existing group of purchasers within the whole loan sale program, on materially similar terms and conditions as the other purchasers in the program. Under our whole loan sale program, we agreed to sell, across all purchasers, a combined total of $180 million gross receivables per quarter of newly originated unsecured personal loans, along with any associated accrued interest. We service the personal loans sold and are entitled to a servicing fee from the purchaser group.
Apollo Group Affiliates. Members of the Apollo Group (as defined below), including Athene Holding Ltd. (“Athene”) and/or their affiliates (collectively, the “Apollo Group Investors”) own, acquire and may continue to own and acquire, securities issued by our subsidiary, OneMain Finance Corporation (“OMFC”), including OMFC-sponsored asset-backed securities and securitization debt (“OMFC Securities”), in the ordinary course of their business. Such OMFC Securities were acquired by the Apollo Group Investors and Athene from the related underwriter on terms that were the same as those that were offered to other investors in such OMFC Securities. Through our indirectly owned insurance companies, we also own Apollo debt securities, which were selected by an independent investment adviser with full investment discretion over the insurance companies’ portfolio.
26

Related Party Transactions Policy and Procedures
Under SEC rules, a related person is an officer, director, nominee for director or beneficial holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing. We have adopted a written policy (the “Related Party Transactions Policy”) that establishes procedures for approving:
(a)
any transaction between (i) a related person or Related Entity, as defined below (related persons and Related Entities referred to herein as “Covered Persons”), on the one hand, and (ii) us or any of our subsidiaries, on the other hand, where such Covered Person has a direct or indirect material interest and the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000; or
(b)
any other transaction providing for the payment by us or any of our subsidiaries of any management, monitoring, service, transaction or other similar fee to any member of the Apollo Group (as defined below) (each of clause (a) and (b), a “Related Party Transaction”).
As provided in the Related Party Transactions Policy and in the charter of the Audit Committee, and except as the Board may otherwise determine, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance (or ratifying, if applicable) any Related Party Transactions. In determining whether to approve or ratify a Related Party Transaction, the Audit Committee must consider, among other factors it deems appropriate, benefits to the Company, whether the terms of the Related Party Transaction are generally available to unrelated third parties, and the extent of the Covered Person’s interest in the Related Party Transaction.
In addition, except as described in the following sentence, if the Company’s legal department determines a Related Party Transaction involves a member of the Apollo Group, such proposed Related Party Transaction must be submitted to the independent directors of the Board who are disinterested and independent under Delaware law (the “Disinterested Directors”) prior to the consummation of such proposed Related Party Transaction.
A Related Party Transaction involving an Ordinary Course Related Entity (as defined below) does not require review or approval under the Related Party Transactions Policy:
(a)
where the amount involved is less than $30 million, and such Related Party Transaction does not involve either (i) the purchase of asset-backed securities from the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (ii) the payment by the Company or a subsidiary thereof of a management, monitoring, service, transaction or other similar fee payable to any Ordinary Course Related Entity; or
(b)
when both (i) such Related Party Transaction is an ordinary course purchase by a Related Entity of asset-backed securities from the Company or any of its subsidiaries in an amount not exceeding $500 million in any transaction or series of related transactions, and (ii) such Related Entity does not purchase more than 70% of any tranche of such asset-backed securities, as long as any Related Party Transaction described in the preceding clause (a) or (b) is made on arm’s-length, fair market terms.
In addition, neither the Company nor its subsidiaries will enforce or waive any right under any agreement between it, on the one hand, and any Ordinary Course Related Entity, on the other hand, without the prior approval of a majority of the Disinterested Directors. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to its chair or, where applicable, to the Disinterested Directors, to approve or ratify any Related Party Transactions between Audit Committee meetings.
For purposes of the Related Party Transactions Policy:

“Apollo Group” means: (a) Apollo, (b) Athene, (c) Athora Holding Ltd. (“Athora”), (d) any investment fund or other collective investment vehicle whose general partner or managing member is owned, directly or indirectly, by Apollo or by one or more of Apollo’s subsidiaries, (e) BRH Holdings GP, Ltd. and its shareholders, (f) any executive officer of Apollo, Athene or Athora whom it designates, in a written notice to the Company, as a member of the Apollo Group for purposes of the Related Party Transactions Policy (until such designee ceases to be an executive officer of that entity) and (g) any affiliate of a
27

person described in clause (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) above. None of the Company, its subsidiaries or any person employed by the Company, Athene, Athora or any of their subsidiaries is deemed to be a member of the Apollo Group, unless such natural person is designated as a member of the Apollo Group as described in clause (f) above.

“Ordinary Course Related Entity” means (a) any member of the Apollo Group and (b) any Related Entity that is either a direct or indirect limited partner of the Acquisition Entity or an affiliate of such a direct or indirect limited partner; and

“Related Entity” means (i) any entity that directly or indirectly owns more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, and any affiliate of such entity, (ii) each member of the Apollo Group for as long as Section 3.04 of the Stockholders Agreement is in effect, and (iii) any entity in which a related person is employed or is a general partner or principal or in which such person has at least a 5% beneficial ownership interest.
28

Director Compensation
Non-Employee Director Compensation
We pay compensation to certain of our non-employee directors for their service as members of the Board and its committees. In 2021, our directors received compensation as set forth in the chart below.
Director Compensation Program($)
Annual Cash Retainer75,000
RSU Grant140,000
Lead Independent Director Retainer25,000
Committee Chair Retainer for the day-to-day leadership, management, direction and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board is responsible, together with the CEO and the other members of the Board, for setting the strategic direction of the Company.

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

While management is responsible for day-to-day risk management of the Company’s operations, the Board is responsible for overseeing enterprise-wide risks. The Board uses its standing committees (discussed below) to monitor and address what may be within the scope of each committee’s expertise or charter. For example: the Audit Committee oversees the financial statements, accounting and auditing functions and related risk; the

30,000
Committee Chair Retainer for Compensation Committee, oversees the Company’s compensation programs, including goals, objectives, performance and compensation for our CEO and other executive officers, and the compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement; and the NCG Committee oversees director qualifications, Board structure and corporate governance matters. The Board also has created a Compliance Committee to oversee regulatory compliance matters, which provides regular reports to the Board. In 2018, the Board created aand Risk Committee to oversee the development and implementation of systems and processes to identify, manage and mitigate reasonably foreseeable material risks to the Company and to assist the Board and its committees in fulfilling their responsibilities25,000
Committee Chair Retainer for risk management, including cybersecurity and information security risks.

In addition to getting information from its committees, the Board also receives updates directly from members of management. In this regard, Mr. Shulman, due to his position as both President and CEO and a director of the Company, is particularly important in communicating with other members of management and keeping the Board updated on the important aspects of the Company’s operations.

Independent Directors

We recognize the importance of having an independent Board that is accountable to the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Governance Guidelines (a copy of which may be found in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website) provide that a majority of the Board’s directors shall be independent in accordance with the NYSE listing standards. Our Board has affirmatively determined that Ms. Soranno Keating and Messrs. Guthrie, Sinensky, Michelini, Becker, Mamik and Smith are “independent” under Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE listing standards. In making this determination, the Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances as required by applicable NYSE listing standards.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Responsibility

We believe that sound corporate citizenship and attention to governance and environmental principles are essential to our success and creating long-term valueNCG Committee

20,000
Committee Member Retainer for our stockholders. Below are some of the ways in which the Company demonstrated its commitment to and made progress toward reducing our environmental impact, encouraging employee engagement and practicing responsible governance in 2018.

Environmental

With a broad footprint of nearly 1,600 branches across the U.S., we believe setting an example in environmental sustainability is an important responsibility and opportunity. As we increase our market footprint, we constantly seek out ways to reduce our carbon footprint. The following is a glance at our energy consumption reduction initiatives:

We have Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Energy Star certified buildings across the U.S., including two corporate headquarters campuses and 50 branch locations.
Our company-wide recycling program includes plastic, cardboard, glass, aluminum and organic materials. Electronics are recycled through a third-party specialist.
We retrofit our corporate offices with LED lighting and install LEDs and programmable thermostats in new branch locations.

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Last year, we increased the number of customers who receive paperless bills by 60%. Now, with 740,000 of our customers enrolled, we’re well on our way to reducing the environmental impact outside of our walls.

Social

Whether it’s our own staff, our valued customers or the communities around us, we place immense value on helping people develop and realize their dreams and ambitions. That’s why we’ve implemented the following social enrichment practices:

Designed to be more robust than the average employee survey, our employee satisfaction survey leads to substantial CEO-initiated process evolutions. The Learning Group, a team specifically appointed to identify training and development needs, uses the survey results to initiate pipeline leadership and professional development programs and initiatives. The Company also monitors the progress of the current programs, initiatives and priorities identified through the survey results.
From recruiting to retention, we prioritize diversity in the workplace via numerous channels. To improve the diversity of our employment candidates, we select college recruitment events, in part, based on the diversity makeup of each school’s student population, and include military veterans in our diversity categories. We have also introduced diverse hiring slates, so we now require at least one of three finalistsAudit Committee
15,000
Committee Member Retainer for executive and senior leadership positions be a woman or an ethnic minority. Additionally, we launched an initiative to identify talented, diverse individuals within the organization as part of our semiannual talent review, and these individuals receive career conversations and development planning to accelerate growth within the organization.
We engaged in numerous philanthropic and community-based initiatives during 2018 that demonstrated our dedication to all the places we call home. Nearly 40% of our community grants and sponsorships were awarded to support financial education and literacy initiatives.
We have an Executive Office of Customer Care (“EOCC”) to resolve customer complaints and coordinate resolution, reporting and root cause analysis across OMH, driving change through organizational partnerships. Additionally, the EOCC has a Military Support Team to ensure that our eligible servicemembers receive the benefits to which they are entitled under various federal and state laws and regulations.
To safeguard customer and company information and to protect our reputation, the Company’s Enterprise Third-Party Risk Management team helps to identify, mitigate and report the potential risks and performance of any third party, including agents and subcontractors, with which the Company has an agreement (contractual or otherwise) to provide products or services to the Company and its customers.

Governance

As a publicly traded company with an established national presence, we place special emphasis on Board oversight and on our internal policies and procedures as they relate to risk management, cybersecurity and compliance. Below are just a few of the ways we’re adding efficiency, accountability and transparency to our operations:

During 2018, our directors heard reports from management on a number of ESG-related issues, including cybersecurity, employment enablement and engagement and certain pro-consumer free changes to our business practices.
To ensure consistency in policies across the organization, we have a robust policy governance framework that sets forth minimum standards for the management of policies and procedures

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

across all lines of business and functional support areas of the Company. The Board reviews certain key policies annually and makes changes when necessary. Additionally, employees receive training on various ESG-related business policies.

OurCompensation Committee, Compliance group designs and implements policies, standards, procedures, guidelines, surveillance reports and other solutions used by our business to test the effectiveness of our controls and track remediation efforts.

Board, Committee, and Annual Meeting Attendance

The Board held twelve meetings during 2018. Each director attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings held during the period he or she served, except for our former director Wesley R. Edens. Directors are invited and encouraged, but are not required, to attend the Annual Meeting. One of the Company’s directors attended the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Presiding Non-Management Director and Executive Sessions

The Company’s non-management and independent directors met in executive session without management five times in 2018. Roy Guthrie is the non-management director appointed to preside at each executive session.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Any Company stockholder or other interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board or any of its members may do so by writing to: Board of Directors (or one or more named directors), c/o, Jack R. Erkilla, Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel & Secretary, OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708.

Communications with the Audit Committee

Complaints and concerns relating to the Company’s accounting, financial reporting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (together, “Accounting Matters”) should be communicated to the Audit Committee of the Board. Any such communications may be made on an anonymous basis. Employee concerns or complaints may be reported to the Audit Committee through a third-party vendor, Navex Global, Inc., that has been retained by the Audit Committee for this purpose. Navex Global may be contacted toll-free at (855) 296-9088, or via the Internet at http://www.onemainfinancial.alertline.com/. Outside parties, including stockholders, may bring issues regarding Accounting Matters to the attention of the Audit Committee by writing to: Audit Committee, c/o, Jack R. Erkilla, Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel & Secretary, OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708.

All complaints and concerns will be reviewed under the direction of the Audit Committee and overseen by the General Counsel and other appropriate persons as determined by the Audit Committee. The General Counsel also prepares a periodic summary report of all such communications for the Audit Committee.

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Criteria and Procedures for Selection of Director Nominees

Although the Board retains ultimate responsibility for nominating members for election to the Board, the NCG Committee of the Board conducts the initial screening and evaluation process. Although there are no minimum qualifications, skills or qualities required to be nominated for election, as provided in the Company’s Governance Guidelines, director nominees, including those directors eligible to stand for re-election, are selected based on, among other things, the following factors:

whether the nominee has demonstrated, by significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make meaningful contributions to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of the Company;
the nominee’s reputation for honesty and ethical conduct in his or her personal and professional activities;
experiences, skills and expertise;
diversity;
business judgment;
composition of the Board;
requirements of applicable laws and NYSE listing standards;
time availability and dedication; and
conflicts of interest.

While the NCG Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy for the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the committee considers in identifying director nominees. In considering diversity, in particular, the NCG Committee considers general principles of diversity in the broadest sense. The NCG Committee seeks to recommend the nomination of directors who represent different qualities and attributes and a mix of professional and personal backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and oversight of our business.

In conducting the screening and evaluation of potential director nominees, the NCG Committee considers candidates recommended by directors and the Company’s management, as well as recommendations from Company stockholders. While the NCG Committee’s Charter and our Governance Guidelines provide that the NCG Committee may, if it deems appropriate, establish procedures to be followed by stockholders in submitting recommendations for director candidates, the NCG Committee has not, at this time, put in place a formal policy with regard to such procedures. This is because our Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”), include procedures for stockholders to nominate candidates to serve on the Board for election at any Annual Meeting or at any special meeting called for the purpose of electing directors. The Board believes that it is appropriate for the Company not to have a specific policy since stockholders may submit recommendations for director candidates by following the procedures set forth in the Bylaws, as summarized below.

The Bylaws require a stockholder who desires to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at an annual meeting of stockholders to timely submit certain information to OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Attention: Secretary. This information includes, among other things:

the stockholder’s name and address, and the class, series and number of shares that he or she beneficially owns;

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record as of the record date and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting;
the name, address and certain other information regarding the stockholder’s nominee for director;
a description of any arrangement or understanding between the stockholder and the director nominee or any other person (naming such person(s)) in connection with the making of such nomination to the Board; and
a completed questionnaire with respect to the prospective nominee’s background and the background of any other person on whose behalf the nomination is being made, and certain written representations and agreements from such persons concerning their independence and compliance with applicable laws.

To be timely, a stockholder must submit the information required by the Bylaws not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days in advance of the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of stockholders. The Bylaws include special notice provisions if no annual meeting was held in the previous year, or if the Annual Meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the preceding Annual Meeting. While these provisions of the Bylaws permit a stockholder to nominate a candidate for election to the Board, such nominations will be subject to certain rights of OMH Holdings, L.P. (the “Acquisition Entity”) under the A&R Stockholders Agreement (defined below). See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — A&R Stockholders Agreement” below for more information.

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides that the Board shall consist of not less than three and not more than 11 directors, as may be determined from time to time by a majority of the entire Board. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board consists of nine members, eight of whom are non-employee directors.

The Board is divided into three classes of equal size. Each class of directors is elected for a three year term of office, but the terms are staggered so that the term of only one class of directors expires at each Annual Meeting of stockholders. The Company’s current Board is classified as follows:

Class
Term
Expiration
Director
Class III
2019
Aneek S. Mamik
Richard A. Smith
Valerie Soranno Keating
Class II
2021
Matthew R. Michelini
Douglas H. Shulman
Marc E. Becker
Class I
2020
Jay N. Levine
Roy A. Guthrie
Peter B. Sinensky

The Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company common stock can elect all of the directors standing for election.

See also the discussion under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — A&R Stockholders Agreement” and “—Apollo-Värde Transaction” below.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has five principal standing committees, the Audit, NCG, Compensation, Compliance and Risk Committees, as well as an Executive Committee. The Audit Committee, the NCG Committee and Risk Committee

10,000
Fees to non-employee directors may be paid in cash or, in lieu of cash, by issuances of Company common stock. We also make annual grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) during the first quarter of each calendar year that vest on the first business day of the year following the grant date, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date. RSUs are credited with dividend equivalents equal to the per share cash dividends paid on our common stock, multiplied by the total number of RSUs subject to the award that are outstanding on the record date for such dividend. The crediting of dividend equivalents is meant to treat the RSU award holders consistently with stockholders. Cash retainers for annual Board, Lead Independent Director, committee chair and committee member service are paid in quarterly installments.
Stock grants are reviewed and approved annually. In general, non-employee directors’ cash and equity-based awards under the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Amended 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Incentive Plan”) are capped at $500,000 during any calendar year. In 2020, we amended the Omnibus Incentive Plan to authorize the Board, at its discretion, to provide certain non-employee directors with a retainer or other fee, grant or payment for service on a special purpose committee or for any other special service.
The Committee believes that these restrictions represent meaningful limits on the compensation payable to our non-employee directors. All members of the Board are also reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings or other Company business.
29

Director Compensation Table for 2021
The total 2021 compensation of our non-employee directors is shown in the following table. We do not separately compensate our employee director, Mr. Shulman, for his Board or committee service. Mr. Mamik, who is a partner of Värde, does not receive compensation from us for his Board or committee service. In addition, former directors Lisa Green Hall, Matthew R. Michelini and Peter B. Sinensky were Apollo employees and did not receive compensation from us for their Board or committee service.
NameFees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
Total
($)
Philip L. Bronner(3)11,09620,66931,765
Phyllis R. Caldwell(4)64,583103,8884,261172,732
Toos N. Daruvala(5)
Roy A. Guthrie175,000143,19812,458330,656
Lisa Green Hall(6)
Valarie Soranno Keating100,000143,198200,344443,542
Aneek S. Mamik
Matthew R. Michelini(6)
Peter B. Sinensky(7)
Richard A. Smith125,000143,19812,458280,656
(1)
The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2021, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These RSUs vested on January 3, 2022.
(2)
Represents dividend equivalent payments on RSU grants.
(3)
Mr. Bronner was elected to the Board effective November 8, 2021 and received prorated compensation for his service during 2021.
(4)
Ms. Caldwell was elected to the Board effective June 1, 2021 and received prorated compensation for her service during 2021.
(5)
Mr. Daruvala was elected to the Board effective February 14, 2022 and accordingly did not receive compensation in 2021.
(6)
Ms. Hall and Mr. Michelini resigned from the Board effective November 8, 2021.
(7)
Mr. Sinensky resigned from the Board effective February 24, 2022.
Director Stock Ownership Policy
In 2016, the Board approved a Director Stock Ownership Policy to align the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders by encouraging significant stock ownership in the Company by our non-employee directors. Such policy is administered by the Compensation Committee and was amended in January 2022.
Pursuant to such policy, each non-employee director must at all times hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to three times the cash retainer for such director’s annual Board service, excluding retainer fees for Board committee chair or committee member service.
Non-employee directors have five years from the date they commence service on the Board to satisfy the requirements of such policy (other than non-employee directors who were serving as of March 2016, who were required to satisfy the requirements of such policy by March 2021). As of the date of this proxy, Roy A.
30

Guthrie, the only non-employee director who has been in service for at least five years, is in compliance with the Director Stock Ownership Policy.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_handpn.jpg]

Must hold shares with value equal to 3x the Compensation Committee consist entirelycash retainer for annual Board service

Value of non-employee directors andholdings is determined by multiplying the Board has determined that each member of these committees is “independent” withinshares held by the meaningaverage closing price of the NYSE listing standards. Members ofshares for the Complianceprevious calendar year

Holdings include shares held directly (including unvested or deferred RSUs) and Risk Committees are not required to be independent directors. Each of the Board’s five principal standing committees operates pursuant to a written charter and each such charter is available on the Company’s website at http://www.onemainfinancial.com/ and is also available to stockholders upon written request, addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, IN 47708, Attention: Secretary.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities and purposes are to: (i) assist the Board in its oversight of: (a) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (b) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (c) the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements, the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm and the evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, and (d) the performance of the Company’s financial reporting process and internal audit function; (ii) determine whether to recommend to the stockholders the appointment, retention or termination of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (iii) review, approve or ratify related party transactions and other matters that may pose conflicts of interest; and (iv) pre-approve all audit, audit-related and

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

other services, if any, to be providedindirectly by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also participates in the certification process relating to the filing of certain periodic reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and prepares the Report of the Audit Committee required under the proxy rules of the SEC to be included in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of stockholders.

The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Guthrie (Chair), Sinensky and Smith. The Board has determined that: (i) each member of the Audit Committee is “independent”; (ii) each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate”; and (iii) Mr. Guthrie is an “audit committee financial expert,” as such terms are defined under the Exchange Act or the NYSE listing standards, as applicable. The Audit Committee met eight times in 2018.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The NCG Committee’s responsibilities and purposes are to: (i) identify and recommend to the Board individuals qualified to serve as directors of the Company and on committees of the Board; (ii) advise the Board as to the Board’s composition, procedures and committees; (iii) develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and maintain and update such guidelines, as appropriate; and (iv) oversee the evaluation of the Board. See “Corporate Governance—Criteria and Procedures for Selection of Director Nominees” above for more information about the process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director.

The current members of the NCG Committee are Messrs. Smith (Chair), Mamik and Sinensky. The Board has determined that each of the members is “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. The NCG Committee met seven times in 2018.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and purposes are to: (i) oversee the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including its executive, incentive and equity compensation plans; (ii) evaluate the performance of the President and CEO and other executive officers; (iii) review and discuss with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement and annual report filed with the SEC; and (iv) prepare the Compensation Committee Report as required by the rules of the SEC. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants and approval of the terms of any such engagement.

Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration ofnon-employee director compensation and executive compensation are set forth below under “Executive Compensation—Independent Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” respectively.

The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees for any purpose that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, except that no subcommittee shall consist of fewer than two members and that the Compensation Committee shall not delegate to a subcommittee any power or authority required by any law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the Compensation Committee as a whole.

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Michelini (Chair), Guthrie and Mamik. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards.

12

Director Deferral Election Program
Each of our non-employee directors may elect to defer the delivery of all or a portion of their annual RSU grant for board service. Delivery of such RSUs may be delayed until the date of the director’s separation from board service, a specified date selected by the director, or the earlier to occur of the director’s separation from board service and a specified date selected by the director. RSUs that have been deferred may be delivered, at the election of the director, in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period of time not to exceed five years. Any deferral election must be made in the year prior to the year of grant and is irrevocable following December 31st of such prior year. Messrs. Guthrie and Smith and Ms. Caldwell made an election in 2021 to participate in the Director Deferral Election Program for 2022. As a new director, Mr. Daruvala had 30 days from his election to the Board to elect to participate in the Director Deferral Election Program and did so on February 14, 2022.
31

Executive Officers
Our executive officers are chosen by and serve at the discretion of the Board. Set forth below is information pertaining to our executive officers as of the date of this proxy statement:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The “independent” directors who are appointed to the Compensation Committee are also “non-employee” directors, as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee met eleven times in 2018.

Compliance Committee

The Compliance Committee’s primary responsibility is to oversee the Company’s efforts to comply with laws and regulations and related programs, policies and procedures, other than matters of financial reporting compliance which are the responsibility of the Audit Committee.

Among other things, the Compliance Committee assists the Board in its oversight function with respect to: (i) ensuring that the Company has an effective compliance program; (ii) monitoring regulatory risks and ensuring that there are appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address them; (iii) fostering good relationships with regulators; and (iv) identifying changes to laws, regulations and best practices that may require changes to compliance programs or business practices.

The current members of the Compliance Committee are Ms. Soranno Keating (Chair) and Messrs. Guthrie, Levine and Michelini. The Compliance Committee met three times in 2018.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee’s primary responsibility is to oversee the development and implementation of the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Risk Committee does this by, among other things: (i) overseeing the development and implementation of systems and processes designed to identify, manage and mitigate reasonably foreseeable material risks to the Company; (ii) assisting the Board and the other Board committees in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities for the risk management functions of the Company; and (iii) overseeing the development and implementation of appropriate enterprise-wide strategies and policies to identify, monitor, manage, control, timely report and mitigate material risks, including financial and non-financial, on and off-balance sheet, and current and contingent exposures.

The current members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Mamik (Chair), Guthrie and Michelini. The Risk Committee met two times in 2018.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee serves as an administrative committee of the Board to act upon and facilitate the consideration by senior management and the Board of certain high-level business and strategic matters. Our Executive Committee currently consists of Messrs. Shulman, Mamik and Michelini.

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The terms of the Class III directors, consisting of Valerie Soranno Keating, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith, will expire at the Annual Meeting. Each incumbent Class III director has been nominated by the Board to serve as a continuing director for a new three year term expiring at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until such director’s successor has been elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

In connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction (as defined below) on June 25, 2018, the size of the Board increased to nine directors (with three directors serving in each Class of the Board), three of the Company’s then current directors resigned from the Board and the Board then appointed six directors (Messrs. Mamik, Smith, Michelini, Becker and Sinensky and Ms. Soranno Keating) designated by the Acquisition Entity to fill the vacancies then existing on the Board. On September 8, 2018, Anahaita N. Kotval resigned and the Board appointed
NameAgeTitle
Douglas H. Shulman to fill the resulting vacancy. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Stockholders Agreement” and “—Apollo-Värde Transaction” below for more information.

In determining whether to nominate each of the Class III directors for another term, the Board considered the factors discussed above under “Corporate Governance—Criteria and Procedures for Selection of Director Nominees” and concluded that each possesses the talents, backgrounds, perspectives, attributes and skills that will enable him or her to continue to provide valuable insights to Company management and play an important role in helping the Company achieve its goals and objectives. The age, principal occupation and certain other information for each director nominee and the continuing directors serving unexpired terms are set forth below. It is the general policy of the Company, as set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, that no director having attained the age of 75 years will stand for re-election.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominees listed below for director.

Class III Director Nominees—Terms expire in 2022

Aneek S. Mamik, age 40
Director of the Company since 2018; Chair of the Risk Committee and member of the Compensation, NCG and Executive Committees

Mr. Mamik is a Senior Managing Director at Värde Partners, Inc. (a global investment management and advisory firm) (“Värde”) and is the head of Värde Financial Services for North America and Asia. He joined Värde in 2016. Prior to joining Värde, Mr. Mamik spent 15 years at General Electric, where he most recently led mergers and acquisitions for GE Capital Headquarters. He led the IPO and subsequent $20 billion stock split off of Synchrony Financial, the largest in history. Mr. Mamik pursued acquisitions globally as part of GE Capital’s expansion and led some of the largest transactions in specialty finance. While at GE Capital, Mr. Mamik also had senior executive experience in capital allocation, strategy and finance across consumer and commercial lending. Mr. Mamik serves on several boards including Fairstone Financial, Inc., CreditShop Holdings LLC and Deephaven Mortgage LLC. Mr. Mamik received a bachelor’s degree in accounting and a master’s in business from Monash University in Australia. He is qualified as a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.

Mr. Mamik’s extensive experience in the consumer finance industry, private equity experience and familiarity with the Company led to Mr. Mamik’s nomination to the Board.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Richard A. Smith, age 65
Director of the Company since 2018; Chair of the NCG Committee and member of the Audit Committee

Mr. Smith is the retired

54Chairman Chief Executive Officer and President of Realogy Holdings Corp. (“Realogy”), a global leader in residential real estate franchising with company-owned real estate brokerage operations as well as relocation, title and settlement services. Prior to his retirement in December 2017, Mr. Smith led Realogy’s business operations for 21 years. Under Mr. Smith’s leadership, Realogy was recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by Ethisphere Institute for seven consecutive years. In 2012, the Company completed one of the largest initial public offerings of the year and in 2014, it acquired ZipRealty Inc. to leverage its innovative technology platform across Realogy’s franchise brands and company-owned brokerage operations in the United States.

Mr. Smith is a former member of the Business Roundtable, an association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies, a former commissioner on the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Housing Commission and previously served on the executive committee of the Policy Advisory Board for Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies. Mr. Smith is a member of the board of directors of Total Systems Services, Inc, a NYSE-listed company headquartered in Columbus, Georgia. Mr. Smith earned his B.S. degree from Columbus State University and received his M.S. degree from Troy State University.

Mr. Smith’s experience and success as a chief executive officer of a public company led to his nomination to the Board.

Valerie Soranno Keating, age 55
Director of the Company since 2018; Chair of the Compliance Committee

Ms. Soranno Keating has been senior advisor to a number of private equity firms in the U.S. and Europe since 2017. From November 2009 through May 2015, she was the Chief Executive Officer of Barclaycard, the global payments division of Barclays PLC (“Barclays”), with $60 billion in assets and over 30 million customers throughout the U.S., Europe and South Africa. Businesses in the Barclaycard portfolio included consumer credit, charge and prepaid cards, digital and in-store sales finance, commercial payments, online personal loans, online deposits, digital merchant offers, wearable payment devices and merchant acquisition. Before joining Barclays, Ms. Soranno Keating held a variety of executive positions at American Express Company from May 1993 through May 2009 including President Travelers Cheques & Prepaid Services, Executive Vice President Global Commercial Services, Executive Vice President Global Merchant Services, Emerging Global Businesses & Network Expansion and Vice President Corporate Strategic Planning. Prior to that, she was a management consultant at Kearney, Inc. from September 1985 through July 1991 and at the Amherst Group Limited from July 1991 through May 1993. Ms. Soranno Keating has served on a number of boards including American Express Incentive Services from June 2001 through July 2007, Travelers Cheques Associates Ltd. from June 2002 through July 2007, Junior Achievement International from January 2003 through June 2009, Harbor Payments, Inc. from May 2008 through June 2009, Barclays Bank of Delaware as Chairman of the Board from January 2010 through August 2015, Visa Europe from October 2011 through August 2015, Apexx Fintech Limited since July 2017, CPI Card Group Inc. since May 2018 and Engage People since August 2018. Ms. Soranno Keating holds a B.S. degree in business administration from Lehigh University. She brings to the Board over 20 years of experience in both executive and board roles across a broad spectrum of lending and payments and related businesses.

Ms. Soranno Keating’s success as the Chief Executive Officer of Barclaycard, as well as her many years of experience in and knowledge of the consumer finance industry, led to Ms. Soranno Keating’s nomination to the Board.

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Class II Directors—Terms expire in 2021

Marc E. Becker, age 46
Director of the Company since 2018

Mr. Becker joined Apollo Global Management, LLC (a global private equity firm) (“Apollo”) in 1996 and is a Senior Partner based in New York. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Becker was employed by Smith Barney Inc. within its Investment Banking division. Mr. Becker currently serves on the board of directors of ADT Inc. and Sun Country Airlines. Mr. Becker has previously served on the board of directors of Pinnacle Agricultural Holdings, LLC, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., CEVA Holdings LLC, Vantium Management, L.P., Realogy Holdings Corp., SourceHOV Holdings, Inc., EVERTEC Group, LLC., Novitex Holdings, Inc. and Mount Sinai Children’s Center Foundation. Mr. Becker is actively involved in a number of non-profit organizations and serves as a board member of the TEAK Fellowship and Park Avenue Synagogue. Mr. Becker graduated cum laude with a B.S. in economics from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business.

Mr. Becker’s vast and diverse array of experience serving on boards of directors, as well as his experience with customer-facing companies, led to Mr. Becker’s nomination to the Board.

Matthew R. Michelini, age 37
Director of the Company since 2018; Chair of the Compensation Committee and member of the Compliance, Risk and Executive Committees

Mr. Michelini is a Partner at Apollo, having joined Apollo in 2006. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Michelini was a member of the mergers and acquisitions group of Lazard Frères & Co. (a financial advisory and asset management firm) from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Michelini serves on the board of directors of AAM GP Ltd., Athene Holding Ltd., Aleris Corporation and Venerable Holdings, Inc. He previously served on the board of directors of Metals USA Holdings Corp., Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. Mr. Michelini graduated from Princeton University with a B.S. in mathematics and a certificate in finance and received his M.B.A. from Columbia University.

Mr. Michelini’s experience in the consumer finance industry, extensive private equity experience and familiarity with the Company led to Mr. Michelini’s nomination to the Board.

Douglas H. Shulman, age 52
Director of the Company since 2018; President and Chief Executive Officer; member of the Executive Committee

Prior to becoming the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in September 2018, Mr. Shulman served as Senior Executive Vice President and Global Head of Client Service Delivery at BNY Mellon (a global investments company) since 2014. From 2013 to 2014, he was a Senior Advisor at McKinsey & Company and Senior Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School Center for Business and Government. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Shulman was the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). Prior to his time at the IRS, Mr. Shulman served as Vice Chairman of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Shulman also previously served as President of Markets, Services and Information as well as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development, Strategy & New Business Ventures at FINRA’s predecessor, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

Mr. Shulman serves on the board of directors of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp, Inc. and the New School. He was previously a director of Mantas Corporation, the World Federation of Exchanges, and was Chairman of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Forum on Tax Administration, the global body of tax authorities. Mr. Shulman holds a J.D. from

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Georgetown University Law Center, a M.P.A. degree from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and a B.A. degree from Williams College.

Mr. Shulman’s experience in the financial services industry and government services led to Mr. Shulman’s nomination to the Board.

Class I Directors—Terms expire in 2020

Jay N. Levine, age 57
Director of the Company since 2011; Chairman of the Board of Directors and member of the Compliance Committee

Mr. Levine was appointed as Chairman of the Board in connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from October 1, 2011 until September 8, 2018. Mr. Levine served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Capmark Financial Group Inc. (“Capmark”) (a commercial real estate finance company) from December 2008 until February 2011. On October 25, 2009, Capmark and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Capmark and certain of its subsidiaries emerged from bankruptcy on September 30, 2011.

From 2000 to 2008, Mr. Levine served as President, Chief Executive Officer (Co-Chief Executive Officer from March 2000 until January 2007), and a member of the board of directors of Royal Bank of Scotland Global Banking & Markets, North America (a banking and financial services company), and Chief Executive Officer of its predecessor entity, RBS Greenwich Capital (a financial services company), with responsibility for the company’s institutional business in the United States. Previously, Mr. Levine was co-head of the Mortgage and Asset Backed Departments at RBS Greenwich Capital. Mr. Levine earned a B.A. in Economics from the University of California at Davis.

Mr. Levine’s extensive experience in the financial industry and his previous experience as an executive officer and director of financial services companies allow him to provide the Board with a broad perspective of our industry and led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Roy A. Guthrie, age 66
Director of the Company since 2012; Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Compensation, Risk and Compliance Committees

Mr. Guthrie was elected as a director in December 2012. Mr. Guthrie currently serves as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Renovate America Inc., a privately-held leading provider of Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) loans in the United States through Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs. He previously served as

Micah R. Conrad50Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Discover Financial Services (“Discover”) (a direct banking and payment services company) from 2005 through April 2011. He retired from Discover in January 2012. Mr. Guthrie also previously served as a director of Discover Bank, a subsidiary of Discover, from 2006 through the end of 2011. Prior to joining Discover, Mr. Guthrie was President and Chief Executive Officer of CitiFinancial International, LTD, a consumer finance business of Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) (a global banking institution), from 2000 to 2004. In addition, Mr. Guthrie served on Citigroup’s management committee during this period of time. Mr. Guthrie also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of CitiCapital from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Guthrie served as Chief Financial Officer of Associates First Capital Corporation (a consumer finance lender) from 1996 to 2000, while it was a public company, and served as a member of its board of directors from 1998 to 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Guthrie served in various positions at Associates First Capital Corporation, including Corporate Controller from 1989 to 1996.

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

He has also served as a director and member of the Audit Committee of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc. (a residential mortgage loan originator and servicer) and its successor by merger Mr. Cooper Group Inc. since February 2012. He also has served as a director and Chairman of the Risk Committee of Synchrony Financial (a private label credit card issuer) since July 2014. Mr. Guthrie also served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of LifeLock, Inc. (an identity theft protection company) from October 2012 until February 2017, as a director of Student Loan Corporation from December 2010 until January 2012, as a director of Enova International, Inc. from January 2012 until July 2012, as a director of Bluestem Brands, Inc. from November 2010 until September 2014, as a director of Dell Bank International from September 2012 until September 2014 and as a director of Garrison Capital LLC from June 2011 until August 2015. He holds a B.A. in economics from Hanover College and an M.B.A. from Drake University.

Mr. Guthrie’s experience as a chief financial officer of two publicly traded companies, his vast experience with and knowledge of the consumer finance industry, his experience and background in finance and accounting and his experience as a director and executive officer of publicly traded companies led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Peter B. Sinensky, age 32
Director of the Company since 2018; member of the Audit and NCG Committees

Mr. Sinensky joined the Private Equity division of Apollo in 2011. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Sinensky was a member of the Mergers and Acquisitions group at J.P. Morgan (a global financial services firm). He currently serves on the board of directors of New VAC Intermediate Holdings B.V. and Luminescence Coöperatief U.A. Mr. Sinensky graduated with high honors from the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University with a B.S. in Finance and Accounting.

Mr. Sinensky’s experience in the consumer finance industry, extensive private equity experience and familiarity with the Company led to Mr. Sinensky’s nomination to the Board.

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive officers are chosen by and serve at the discretion of the Board. Set forth below is information pertaining to our executive officers as of March 28, 2019:

Name
Rajive Chadha57
Age
Title
Douglas H. Shulman
52
President and Chief Executive Officer
John C. Anderson
60
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
Micah R. Conrad*
47
Executive Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Hurzeler
57
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

* Our former Executive Vice President and CFO, Scott T. Parker, resigned effective on March 26, 2019.

Douglas H. Shulman
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Please see Mr. Shulman’s biographical information above under the heading “Proposal 1: Election of Directors – Class II Directors - Terms expire in 2021.”

John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk

Mr. Anderson currently serves as Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Capital Markets from October 2011 to February 2017. Mr. Anderson also served as General Counsel from May 2014 through November 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Anderson was Managing Director for RBS located in Stamford, Connecticut. Mr. Anderson’s last role at RBS was Managing Director in the Asset Backed and Principal Finance Department. Prior to that, Mr. Anderson held roles of increasing responsibilities for predecessor entities Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. and RBS Greenwich Capital for more than 20 years.

Micah R. Conrad
Executive Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Conrad was appointed as Acting Chief Financial Officer on March 26, 2019. Mr. Conrad has served as Executive Vice President of the Company since March 2017 and as Senior Vice President of the Company from November 2015 through March 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Conrad served as Chief Financial Officer of OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc. (a consumer finance lender) from 2013 until November 2015, when it was acquired by the Company (then known as Springleaf Holdings, Inc.) from CitiFinancial Credit Company. Before taking his position at OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc., Mr. Conrad was a managing director at Citigroup (a global banking institution) and served in a variety of senior finance roles within Citi Holdings, Global Wealth Management and Institutional Clients Group. Mr. Conrad also serves as a director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SFC.

Robert Hurzeler
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Hurzeler joined us in January 2014

Douglas H. Shulman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Please see Mr. Shulman’s biographical information above under the heading “Corporate Governance — The Board of Directors — Director Biographies — Class II Directors — Terms expire in 2024.”
Micah R. Conrad
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Conrad has served as Executive Vice President and CFO since March 2019. Mr. Conrad previously served as an Executive Vice President of the Company since March 2017 and as Senior Vice President of the Company from November 2015 through March 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Conrad served as Chief Financial Officer of OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc. (a consumer finance lender) from 2013 until November 2015, when it was acquired by the Company (then known as Springleaf Holdings, Inc.) from CitiFinancial Credit Company. Before taking his position at OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc., Mr. Conrad was a managing director at Citigroup (a global banking institution) and served in a variety of senior finance roles within Citi Holdings, Global Wealth Management, and Institutional Clients Group. Mr. Conrad also serves as a director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OMFC.
Rajive Chadha
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Chadha has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since June 2019. Mr. Chadha previously served as Executive Vice President, Head — Consumer Bank Products & Origination Partnerships at Regions Bank, the banking subsidiary of Regions Financial Corporation, from 2015 until he joined the Company. From 2013 to 2015, he was Head of Strategic Initiatives — Payments & Banking at Discover. Mr. Chadha was President of Diners Club International Ltd., a subsidiary of Discover, from 2008 to 2012. Before that, he spent approximately 20 years at Citigroup (a global banking institution) and held a number of positions, including President of the North America Auto Finance Division, Retail Mortgage Head and Chief Operating Officer of the Consumer Lending Division, where he managed the home equity and personal loans business. Mr. Chadha holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India and a Bachelor of Arts (Honors) degree in Economics from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi, India.
32

Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive officer compensation program and the process by which our Compensation Committee (within this CD&A, the “Committee”) makes decisions designed to align the compensation of our executives with our business strategy and performance and reward achievement of financial targets and effective strategic leadership.
For 2021, our named executive officers (“NEOs”) were:
Douglas H. Shulman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
Micah R. Conrad, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and
Rajive Chadha, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Our compensation disclosures are organized in the six sections referenced below, the first four of which form this CD&A:
SectionPage
Company Achievements and Executive Compensation Overview
Fiscal 2021 Compensation Elements
Employee Benefits and Other Compensation
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Executive Compensation Tables
CEO Pay Ratio
1Company Achievements and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Hurzeler previously served as Executive Vice President, Auto Lending and Centralized Operations. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Chief Operating Officer for Global Lending Services (an automotive subprime lender) from June 2012 until January 2014. Mr. Hurzeler was with Wells Fargo & Company (“WFC”) (a diversified financial services company) from 1986 to

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

June 2012, where he last served as head of Wells Fargo Auto Finance (since 2008), an auto lender and subsidiary of WFC.

Former Executive Officers

Scott T. Parker, age 52
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Parker joined us in November 2015 and served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until his resignation effective on March 26, 2019. Mr. Parker previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”) (a commercial finance company) from July 2010 to November 2015. Prior to CIT, Mr. Parker served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cerberus Operations and Advisory Company LLC, an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, LP (“Cerberus”) (a private investment firm). Before joining Cerberus in 2006, Mr. Parker spent 17 years in various financial leadership roles within the industrial and financial services businesses at General Electric Company, most recently as the Chief Financial Officer for GE Capital Solutions. Prior to GE Capital Solutions, Mr. Parker was Chief Financial Officer of GE Corporate Financial Services.

Bradford D. Borchers, age 55
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations

Mr. Borchers joined us in October 1983 as a management trainee. He has held positions of increasing responsibility over the intervening 35 years. He assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Springleaf Branch Operations in April 2008 and currently serves as Executive Vice President, Branch Operations for our entire branch network. Mr. Borchers also served as Director of Operations from 1996 to 2004 and as Senior Director of Operations from 2004 to 2008.

During 2017, Mr. Borchers served as an “executive officer” within the meaning of Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act, and Mr. Borchers is included among our “named executive officers” within the meaning of Item 402 of Regulation S-K for 2018 compensation disclosure purposes. On February 7, 2018, our Board determined not to designate Mr. Borchers as an “executive officer” within the meaning of Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act. Mr. Borchers continues in his current role as Executive Vice President, Branch Operations.

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below with management and, based upon such review and discussion, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Matthew R. Michelini, Chairman
Roy A. Guthrie
Aneek S. Mamik

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In this section, we discuss our compensation philosophy and describe the compensation for our President and CEO and our other “named executive officers” within the meaning of Item 402 of Regulation S-K (collectively, the “NEOs”). We explain how our Board’s Compensation Committee (as used in this section, the “Committee”) determines compensation for our NEOs and its rationale for specific 2018 compensation decisions.

The following individuals are our 2018 NEOs:

Name
Title
Douglas H. Shulman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Jay N. Levine
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott T. Parker
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
Robert A. Hurzeler
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Bradford D. Borchers
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations

* Mr. Parker resigned as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.

Executive Summary

Our executive compensation program is designed to reward financial results and effective strategic leadership – key elements in building sustainable value for stockholders. We believe our executive compensation program aligns the interests of our stockholders and our executives by correlating the amount of actual pay to our short-term and long-term performance.

We carefully benchmark our executive compensation decisions against a relevant group of peer companies – all of which are potential competitors for the national caliber of executive talent required to manage a large, decentralized, multi-state consumer finance lender.

Compensation Arrangements for our new President and Chief Executive Officer

On September 8, 2018 (the “start date”), Douglas H. Shulman became our President and CEO succeeding Jay N. Levine, who resigned as President and CEO but remained as our non-executive Chairman of the Board. The Company and Mr. Shulman entered into an employment agreement effective on July 10, 2018. Mr. Shulman’s compensation under his employment agreement includes an annual base salary, a one-time grant of cash settled options, a replacement equity award and eligibility for an annual target bonus payable in cash, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RSUs, which are subject to performance goals established by the Committee. See “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Employment Agreement with Mr. Shulman” below for further details.

2018 Achievements, Pay for Performance Alignment and Compensation Decisions

In 2018, we realized our key operating objectives and continued to see the benefits from the integration efforts across all aspects of our business. Credit losses were in line with our expectations, our portfolio yield remained stable, we grew our net finance receivables while increasing the mix of secured loans in our portfolio and we strengthened our balance sheet. Our 2018 net income for the full year of $447 million under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) represents more than a 144% increase over 2017 net income.

2018 was also a transition year, primarily as a result of the completion of the Apollo-Värde Transaction, and the total compensation for Messrs. Levine, Parker, Hurzeler and Anderson, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 below, was significantly affected by this event. For example, Messrs. Levine, Parker, Hurzeler and Anderson received significant payouts of the SFH Incentive Units (defined below) in connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction. In addition, the Committee considered the substantial work undertaken by the executive team to complete the Apollo-Värde transaction, the related disruption and uncertainty and the need to retain executive talent when setting annual incentive compensation goals and making special awards for executive officers in 2018. Although the base salaries for each of our NEOs were left unchanged for 2018, their total compensation for 2018 increased consistent with our pay for performance philosophy based upon the attainment of specific, pre-established financial metrics and strategic objectives relevant to their responsibilities as discussed below under the caption “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Annual Incentive Plan Compensation.”

We made equity grants in 2018 to Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Borchers and Anderson to serve as a catalyst for future performance, address the competitivenessOverview

2021 Financial Highlights
In 2021, we delivered positive financial results amidst the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and continued to support our team members and our businesses to maximize long-term value for our stockholders. Our management team focused on actions to support our mission of improving the financial well-being of hardworking Americans with a vision to be the partner of choice for the non-prime consumer, solving financial needs and enabling progress toward a better future. These strategic priorities align with the focus areas of the qualitative component of our annual incentive compensation program, including positioning for the future, continuing to optimize our core business, stabilizing our core business to accommodate growth, continuing to maintain and strengthen the balance sheet and driving our mission as a socially responsible company.
Following the end of the year, the Committee determined actual annual and long-term incentive awards for the NEOs based on an assessment of the achievement of the financial and qualitative performance goals set at the beginning of the fiscal year.
Select Highlights for Fiscal 2021 Include:

Grew our Consumer and Insurance segment (“C&I”) Managed Receivables (“Managed Receivables”)* by $1.5 billion and had over $1.3 billion of C&I Capital Generation,* allowing us to continue to invest in our future while also returning significant capital to our stockholders

Developed new partner distribution channels, which are contributing to growth
33


Launched differentiated credit cards, which reward customers for good payment habits

Acquired and successfully integrated Trim, our customer-focused financial wellness FinTech platform

Issued our inaugural social bond and formalized our social bond framework, furthering our commitment to financial inclusion with net proceeds of the issuance serving credit-disadvantaged communities around the country

Entered into a $4 million service contract with EVERFI, a global social-impact technology provider, to develop and distribute free, digital financial education to 1,500 high schools nationwide over four academic school years

Instituted a number of new benefits for team members, including paid time off for vaccinations, child care benefits, enhanced coverage of health care costs, flexible scheduling and an employee stock purchase plan

Supported customers through continued extension of borrower’s assistance programs and providing credit access to a consumer segment that is generally underserved by the traditional banking system

Significantly enhanced liquidity in our stock by facilitating the Consortium Transactions (defined above), reducing the Consortium’s aggregate beneficial ownership from approximately 40.9% to approximately 5.9% of our outstanding common stock

Continued to provide significant capital returns to stockholders through share repurchases and a robust dividend yield
Omnichannel Operating Model

Managed Receivables* grew $1.5 billion, or 9%, in 2021; new product and channel initiatives supported growth in 2021

Robust investment in digital, data science and new products/channels continued throughout 2021

Nearly half of all loans closed digitally in 2021
Sophisticated and Conservative Underwriting

C&I Net Charge-offs of 4.2% in 2021, as compared to 5.5% in 2020 and 6.0% in 2019
Significant Liquidity and Capital Markets Access

Issued a $750 million social bond in June 2021 to support our continued efforts to provide responsible loans to credit-insecure and credit-at-risk communities, with at least 75% of loans funded by the social bond being allocated to women or minority borrowers

Issued $1.0 billion of two-year revolving asset-backed securities at 0.98% in October 2021

Successfully accessed the capital markets to help fund future operations by issuing 3.875% unsecured senior notes due 2028

Enhanced liquidity profile with a five-year, $1.0 billion unsecured corporate revolver
Strong Capital Generation

Strong C&I Capital Generation* of  $1.3 billion in 2021

Increased regular annual dividend by $1.00 in February 2022 to $3.80 per share, >7% yield at current share price

Repurchased 6.7 million shares in 2021, and in February 2022 announced a $1.0 billion share repurchase plan through 2024
*
See Appendix for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures and descriptions of certain key performance indicators.
The outstanding business results in fiscal 2021 support our long-term value creation strategy. Over the three years of his tenure as CEO, Doug Shulman and our executive leadership team have successfully
34

focused on the business strategy and execution priorities outlined at our Investor Day in 2019. Our continued focus on optimizing and strengthening our core business, maintaining the strength of our balance sheet, launching new product initiatives and deepening relationships with our customers has kept us on track to deliver on the roadmap we laid out in 2019 and has resulted in outperformance relative to both the S&P 500 and our peers.
3-Year Total Stockholder Return(1)
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-bc_stockholderpn.jpg]
(1)
Includes reinvestment of dividends; measured from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021; peer group listed on page 47.
Executive Compensation Overview
We believe the compensation-related actions undertaken for 2021 are consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy. Our NEO compensation program for 2021 consisted of target total direct compensation, which the Committee establishes early in our fiscal year as part of its assessment of our prior year performance, and retention equity awards that were granted later in 2021.
Fiscal 2021 Target Total Direct Compensation
Our target total direct compensation in 2021 was comprised of the following elements:
Base salary, designed to provide a competitive level of set pay relative to a group of peer companies (the “Peer Group”), as discussed below.
Annual incentive, based on the achievement of annual financial performance metrics and qualitative strategic factors and paid out in the form of:

Cash incentive, which is paid in a lump sum; and

Restricted stock units, which vest over time based on continued service.
Long-term, performance-based equity awards, comprised of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”), which are earned subject to the achievement of additional pre-established performance goals and continued service for a three-year performance period.
We believe incentive compensation should constitute a significant majority of an executive officer’s compensation. The charts below reflect the 2021 target total direct compensation mix for our CEO and other NEOs.
35

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-pc_targettotpn.jpg]
Target incentive awards consisting of cash incentive and RSUs tie payout to the achievement of annual financial and qualitative performance metrics. The Committee intends for these awards to reward consistent, stable and long-term performance by tying executive compensation to annual financial performance metrics. Cash incentive and RSUs typically each represent one-third of an executive officer’s target incentive compensation opportunity. Cash incentive awards are paid early in the year with respect to prior year performance. RSUs vest in three equal annual installments.
For 2021, financial performance metrics comprised 80% of our annual incentive awards as follows:
Metric*Weighting
C&I Capital Generation30%
C&I Net Charge-Offs15%
C&I Operating Expenses15%
Unlevered C&I Rate of their total compensation and provide for a retention incentive. Consistent with our focus on pay for performance and in order to enhance retention, the Committee historically has required that amounts payable in settlement of awards under the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Annual Leadership Incentive Plan (the “Annual Plan”Return (%) be paid in a mix of cash and RSUs that vest over several years as follows: the first $500,000 in cash; the next $500,000 in RSUs; and awards in excess of $1 million are paid equally in cash and RSUs. The RSUs granted under the Annual Plan vest ratably in three annual installments subject to the recipient’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

In taking the actions discussed above, the Committee considered the equity awards granted under the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”(“C&I ROR”), including the value realized upon vesting during 2018 of prior year equity awards, the amount and form of payouts under the Annual Plan for the other NEOs and distributions in respect of SFH Incentive Units that were made in prior years.

In addition, we also made equity and other incentive compensation grants to Mr. Shulman in connection with his appointment as our President and CEO commencing on September 8, 2018. These arrangements are described under the caption “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Employment Agreement with Mr. Shulman.”

Certain of our executive officers, including some of our NEOs, held incentive units (the “SFH Incentive Units”) in Springleaf Financial Holdings, LLC (“SFH”), our majority stockholder at the time of our initial public offering. These SFH Incentive Units were designed to further align the interests of our management with those of our stockholders because they only provided cash payouts to the extent that distributions by SFH to its owners exceeded certain thresholds, including distributions made in connection with sales of Company common stock by SFH. As a result of the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction on June 25, 2018, some of our NEOs received substantial cash distributions in final

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

settlement of their SFH Incentive Units set forth below under “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Payouts of SFH Incentive Units.” These payments are reflected in the compensation tables that follow this discussion.

We believe the compensation related actions that we undertook in 2018 were consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, while appropriately balancing risk and reward without exposing the Company to imprudent or undue risk taking.

Our Executive Compensation Governance Practices and Policies

Review of Pay Versus Performance. The Committee regularly reviews the relationship between executive pay and Company performance.
No Repricing. The Omnibus Incentive Plan does not permit the repricing of stock options or other stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval.
15%
Customer Accounts (in thousands)5%
Compensation Benchmarking. We use compensation data compiled from a group of publicly traded peer companies in the diversified financial services industries (including banking, consumer finance and thrifts and mortgage finance), as well as the specialty retail and IT services industries.
*
Refer to the Appendix for a description of these metrics, other than customer accounts, and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.
The remaining 20% of our annual incentive awards were determined based on qualitative strategic factors considered by the Committee, including its assessment of the achievement of pre-established strategic objectives and the Company’s progress on its strategic priorities in the following areas:

positioning for the future;

continuing to optimize our core business;

stabilizing our core business to accommodate growth;

continuing to maintain and strengthen the balance sheet; and

driving our mission as a socially responsible company.
36

PSUs typically represent the remaining one-third of an executive officer’s target incentive compensation opportunity. Payout of PSUs is based upon the attainment of three-year cumulative performance goals related to Economic Earnings. The two performance metrics for PSU awards granted in 2021 were:
No Hedging of Shares. We do not permit hedging or short sales of our stock, or similar transactions where potential gains are linked to a decline in our share price, by our directors, officers, employees or their spouses or dependents.
Metric*Weighting
Economic Earnings Average Growth67%
Economic Average Unlevered Return (%)33%
Restrictive Covenants. Our executive officers, including our NEOs, are subject to restrictive covenants upon separation from the Company, including non-solicitation and non-disclosure obligations. Messrs. Shulman, Parker and Hurzeler are also subject to non-competition covenants upon separation from the Company pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. In addition, the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) includes a 12-month non-competition obligation for Executive Vice Presidents.
*
Refer to the Appendix for a description of these metrics.
In early 2021, the Committee established 2021 target total direct compensation for our NEOs, along with targets for the financial performance metrics and qualitative strategic objectives (as described in detail below). In January 2022, the Committee assessed performance against these targets and approved payouts to the NEOs in respect of their annual incentive awards. In approving this payout, the Committee considered that while performance would have resulted in a payout of 139.4% of target, due to macroeconomic factors — including the impact of government stimulus on credit losses — it was appropriate for the Committee to exercise discretion to reduce the payout to 118.5% of target.
The table below provides the 2021 target total direct compensation opportunity for our named executive officers, which consisted of base salary, annual incentive award target (payable in the form of cash incentive and RSUs) and the target value of long-term incentive awards (PSUs). This information is intended to supplement, but not replace, the information reported in the Summary Compensation Table, which reports fiscal 2021 compensation in the format required by SEC rules.
2021 Target Direct Compensation*
Base SalaryAnnual
Incentive
Target
Performance
Share Unit
Grant
Target
Total Direct
Compensation
Douglas H. Shulman$1,000,000$4,333,334$1,833,333$7,166,667
Micah R. Conrad$450,000$1,233,333$616,667$2,300,000
Rajive Chadha$450,000$1,166,667$583,333$2,200,000
*
The amounts in this table reflect targeted amounts at the time the Committee made its 2021 annual compensation determinations in January 2021, other than for Mr. Shulman, whose information reflects a July 2021 salary increase and corresponding increase in his 2021 annual incentive compensation target. This table does not include equity retention grants that were made to Mr. Shulman in July 2021 and Messrs. Conrad and Chadha in September 2021.
Retention Awards Granted in 2021
In addition to the total direct compensation components described above, the Committee determined, following consultation with our independent compensation consultant, that retention equity awards were necessary in fiscal 2021 to ensure the retention of our NEOs during an important transition period and to further incentivize the achievement of stockholder value creation as the Company moves to its next phase of growth. These awards, described in greater detail on pages 42 and 43, were comprised of 50% RSUs that vest over a four-year period and 50% PSUs that vest based on achievement of total stockholder return (“TSR”) thresholds over a seven-year performance period. In addition, to further align Mr. Shulman’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders and further incentivize the creation of stockholder value as the Company moves to its next phase of growth, Mr. Shulman agreed to purchase an aggregate value of $1 million of the Company’s common stock following his award.
Compensation Philosophy
Our objective is to provide a market-based total compensation program tied to performance and aligned with the interests of our stockholders. We view compensation practices as a means for communicating our
37

goals and standards of conduct and performance and for motivating and rewarding team members in relation to their achievements.
We observe the following guiding principles in setting executive compensation:
Independent Compensation Consultant. The Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as its 2018 independent compensation consultant. Pearl Meyer was retained directly by the Committee and performs no other services for the Company.
Compensation Clawbacks. In 2016, we adopted a policy to recover incentive-based awards from our executive officers for the three year period prior to any accounting restatement that would have resulted in a lower payment because of the restated results.
Review of Compensation Peer Groups. Our peer group is reviewed periodically by the Committee and adjusted, when necessary, to ensure that its composition remains a relevant and appropriate comparison for our executive compensation program. In 2018, we did not make any changes to our peer group.
Stock Ownership Policies. In 2017, we adopted a policy requiring our CEO to hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to five times his annual base salary and each of our other executive officers to hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to three times their respective annual base salaries. In 2016, we adopted a policy requiring our independent directors to hold shares of Company common stock equal to at least three times the cash retainer fees paid to our independent directors for annual board service.
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups. We do not provide gross-up payments to offset any “golden parachute” excise taxes potentially incurred by our executives in connection with a change in control.

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What Guides Our Executive Compensation Program?

Philosophy and Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

The philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to provide an attractive, flexible and market-based total compensation program tied to performance and aligned with the interests of our stockholders. Our objective is to recruit
Hire and retain the caliber of executive officers and other key employees necessary to deliver sustained high performance to our stockholders and customers. Equally important, we view compensation practices as a means for communicating our goals and standards of conduct and performance and for motivating and rewarding employees in relation to their achievements.

We observe the following guiding principles in setting executive compensation:

Retain and hire top-caliber executives: executives:
Executive officers should have base salariespay and employee benefits that are market competitive and that permit us to hire and retain high-caliber individuals at all levels;
Pay forlevels necessary to deliver sustained high performance: A significant portion of the total compensation of our executive officers should be linked to the achievement of Company performance objectives;
Align compensation with stockholder interests: The interests of our executive officers should be aligned with those of our stockholders through the risks and rewards of the ownership of Company common stock;
Provide limited perquisites: Perquisites for our executive officers should be minimized and limited to items that serve a reasonable business purpose; and
customers.
Reinforce succession planning process:process: The overall compensation program for our executive officers should reinforce our succession planning process by providing competitive total compensation necessary to attract, motivate and retain key executive talent.


How We Make Compensation Decisions

Role

Discourage imprudent risk-taking: Executive officers should be incentivized to help the Company achieve its goals, but not to take excessive or inappropriate risks as a result. In addition, by selecting multiple performance goals over different time periods we believe our compensation program avoids incentivizing excessive risk-taking.Pay-for-performance: A significant portion of the Compensation Committee

The Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the development and administration of ourtotal compensation and benefits policies and programs. The Committee, which consists of three independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive officers should be linked to the achievement of long-term Company performance goals and strategies.

Align compensation program.

24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with stockholder interests:The Committee is responsible for evaluating annually the performanceinterests of our CEO and determining and approving our CEO’s compensation based on such evaluation. Additionally, the Committee is responsible for the following, among its other duties:

Reviewing and approving corporate incentive goals and objectives relevant to compensation;
Evaluating individual performance results in light of these goals and objectives;
Evaluating the competitiveness of each executive officer’s total compensation package; and
Approving any changes to the total compensation package, including, but not limited to, base salary and annual and long-term incentive award opportunities.

The role of the Committee is described in detail in the Compensation Committee Charter, which is available under the Corporate Governance tab in the Investor Relations sectionofficers should be aligned with those of our website at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com/. The Committee is supported in its work by our Executive Vice President, Human Resources, her staffstockholders through the risks and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as described below.

Rolerewards of the Chief Executive Officer

The CEO, working with management, makes recommendations to the Committee regarding executive compensation structure, metrics and goals.

Roleownership of the Chief Risk Officer

In reviewing proposed variable compensation programsCompany common stock.

Provide limited perquisites: Perquisites for our executive officers are minimized and other employees, the Committee attemptslimited to balance theitems that serve a reasonable business risks inherent in the program design with its compensation objectives to evaluate whether such program design encourages responsible investmentpurpose.

Key Compensation Practices
The Committee has adopted the following practices to support its commitment to the above guiding principles:
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Review of our resources and does not unintentionally encourage or reward imprudent risk-taking. After a review of our compensation plans by our Chief Risk Officer, who briefed the Committee at its meeting in October 2018, the Committee concluded that our compensation plans were well-defined and well documented and that our incentive compensation plans are not unbalanced such that they encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking that would endanger the reputation or financial well-being of the Company.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

Pay Versus Performance:The Committee retained Pearl Meyer as its independentreviews the relationship between executive compensation consultant for 2018. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Committeepay and the Committee may replace its compensation consultant or hire additional consultants at any time. A representative of Pearl Meyer attends meetings of the Committee, when requested, and communicates with the Committee Chair between meetings. The Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the NYSE rules and the Committee concluded that the work performed by Pearl Meyer for the Committee did not raise any conflict of interest.

Pearl Meyer provides various executive compensation services to the Committee pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Committee. Generally, these services include advising the Committee on the principal aspects of our executive compensation program and evolving industry practices and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our program design and our award values in relationship toCompany performance. Pearl Meyer provided no additional services to us in 2018.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Compensation Peer Group

The Committee usesBenchmarking: We use compensation data compiled from a group of publicly traded peer companies in the diversified financial services industries, (including banking, consumer finance, thrifts and mortgage finance), as well as the specialty retail and IT services industries, (the “Peer Group”). The Committee

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

periodically reviews and updates the Peer Group, as necessary, upon the recommendation of its independent compensation consultant. During 2018, the Committee chose not to revise the Peer Group.

We believe the current Peer Group represents the industries with which we currently compete for executive talent, and also includes our principal business competitors.

Industry
Peer Group
Specialty Retail
Aaron’s Inc.
IT Services
Alliance Data Systems Corporation
Consumer Finance
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Banking
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
Banking
CIT Group Inc.
Banking
Comerica Incorporated
Multiline Retail
Dollar Tree, Inc.
IT Services
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Banking
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Consumer Finance
LendingClub Corporation
Consumer Finance
Navient Corporation
Thrifts and Mortgage Finance
Mr. Cooper Group Inc. (successor by merger to Nationstar Mortgage Holdings)
Consumer Finance
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.
Consumer Finance
SLM Corporation
Consumer Finance
Synchrony Financial
IT Services
The Western Union Company

Use of Competitive Data

The Committee relies on various sources of compensation information to ascertain the competitive market for our executive officers, including the NEOs. To assess the competitiveness ofsupport our executive compensation program, we analyze Peer Group compensation data obtained from peer company proxy materials as well as compensationprocess and benefits survey data provided by national compensation consulting firms. As part of this process, we measure our program’s competitiveness by comparing relevant market data against actual pay levels within each compensation component and in the aggregate for each executive officer position. We also review the mix of our compensation components with respect to fixed versus variable, short-term versus long-term, and cash versus equity-based pay. This information is then presented to the Committee for its review and use.

The Committee generally compares the compensation of each NEO in relation to the 50th and 75th percentiles of the Peer Group for similar positions. In addition, the Committee considers various factors such as our performance within the Peer Group, the unique characteristics of the individual’s position and any succession and retention considerations, which may result in the NEO being compensated above or below the 50th to 75th percentile range.

decisions.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]

26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive OfficerRobust Stock Ownership Policy

On July 24, 2017, the Committee approved the Executive Officer Stock Ownership Policy to further align the interests ofPolicies: We maintain stock ownership policies requiring our executive officers with those of our stockholders by encouraging significant stock ownership in the Company. The policy is administered by the Committee. Pursuant to the policy, our CEO is required to hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to fiveof at least 5 times his base salary for our CEO and each of our3 times respective annual base salary for other executive officers is requiredofficers.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Compensation Clawbacks: We maintain a policy to hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to three times base salary. For purposes of determining compliance with such policy at any time, the value of our executive officers’ holdings is determined by multiplying the number of shares held by such executive officer by the average closing price of a share of Company common stock for the previous calendar year. Our executive officers’ holdings include shares held directly by the executive officer, including unvested restricted shares and RSUs, and shares owned indirectly or beneficially by the executive officer. With the exception of our President and CEO and our Executive Vice President and Acting CFO, our current executive officers are required to meet the requirements of such policy by July 2022. Mr. Shulman, our President and CEO, and any other individual who becomes an executive officer after July 2017, will have five yearsrecover incentive-based awards from the date such individual commences service as executive officer to satisfy the requirements of the policy.

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Components of Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program

The principal components of our 2018 executive compensation program and the purpose of each component are presented in the following table:

Program Element
Purpose
2018 Actions
Base Salary
Fixed amount that establishes a minimum level of cash compensation.
None of our NEOs received an increase in base salary in 2018.

Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement provides for an initial annual base salary of $800,000.
Guaranteed &
Discretionary
Bonuses
Attract and retain key executive talent.
Under the terms of Mr. Hurzeler’s employment agreement, he is eligible to participate in the Annual Plan, subject to a minimum guaranteed cash payment of $400,000. Mr. Hurzeler received a payout under the Annual Plan for 2018 performance, the value of which exceeded his minimum guarantee. We also granted RSUs and provided accelerated vesting for awards previously granted to Mr. Parker as discussed under the caption “Our 2018 Compensation in Detail – Guaranteed and Discretionary Bonuses.”
Annual Incentive
Plan
Compensation
Variable incentive compensation that ties payouts to the achievement of financial performance metrics and individual contributions.
Each of the NEOs, other than Messrs. Levine and Shulman, participated in the Annual Plan during 2018. Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Borchers and Anderson received payouts under the Annual Plan for actual 2018 performance compared to plan targets.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Shulman is eligible for an annual target bonus of $5,500,000, payable in cash, performance-based RSUs and RSUs, in each case subject to achievement of annual performance goals established by the Committee. The cash and RSU portions of the 2018 target bonus were $3,666,667. In 2018, the target bonus: (i) was prorated for the period from the start date through December 31, 2018; (ii) includes an additional amount equal to two-thirds of Mr. Shulman’s target bonus at his prior employer, prorated for the period from January 1, 2018 to the start date; and (iii) relating to Mr. Shulman’s OMH tenure, was increased by the same factor used for the Company’s other NEOs based on actual 2018 performance under the Annual Plan. These awards were settled in February 2019 in a combination of cash and RSUs.

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Program Element
Purpose
2018 Actions
Equity Incentive
Plan
Compensation
Establishes an equity component of total compensation that extends the executive’s decision-making vision beyond the current year to long-term growth and prosperity. Designed to forge a direct link between executive and stockholder interests by transforming executives into stockholders. Aids in executive retention.
Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler were granted performance-based RSUs in July 2018 with a grant date fair value of $1,250,000 and $1,000,000, respectively. These awards were designed to support our pay for performance culture and to align the executives’ interests with those of our stockholders over a multi-year period.
SFH Incentive Units
Aligned the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and incentivized the achievement of increases in our stock price.
Messrs. Levine, Parker, Hurzeler and Anderson received distributions in final settlement of their SFH Incentive Units in connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction.
Benefits
Provides our executives with access to group health and welfare benefit plans and fringe benefit programs, including annual profit-sharing awards.
Each of our executive officers is eligible to participate in our various group health and welfare benefit plans and fringe benefit programs that are generally available to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis.

Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail

Base Salary

Base salary is the principal fixed component of our executives’ total direct compensation that establishes a minimum level of cash compensation for our executive officers includingfor the NEOs, and is determined by considering the competitive marketplace. The Committee reviews compensation data provided by its independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer, specificthree-year period prior to the Peer Groupany accounting restatement that would have resulted in order to determine the overall competitivenessa lower payment because of the NEOs’ total compensation. For 2018, Mr. Shulman’s initial base salary was determined after considering advice from our independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer,restated results.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Avoid Inappropriate Risk-taking: Our incentive award opportunities incorporate multiple performance metrics over long-term and by considering Mr. Shulman’s base compensation level at his former employer. For the other NEOs, there were no changes in 2018 base salary levels as comparedshort-term periods and avoid over-emphasizing any one metric or goal, which serves to the levels established for 2017.

Name
Position
2018
Base
Salary
Douglas H. Shulman(1)
President and Chief Executive Officer
$
800,000
 
Jay N. Levine(1)
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
$
400,000
 
Scott T. Parker(2)
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
$
400,000
 
John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
$
350,000
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
$
350,000
 
Bradford D. Borchers
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations
$
350,000
 
discourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking.
(1)Mr. Shulman’s became our President and CEO effective on the start date. Mr. Levine served as President and CEO from October 2011 until that date.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
(2)Mr. Parker resigned as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Guaranteed & Discretionary Bonuses

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Hurzeler’s employment agreement, he was entitled to receive a minimum guaranteed bonus of $400,000. Instead he received his calculated payout under the Annual Plan of $2,033,600 in February 2019, which exceeded his minimum guaranteed bonus. In February 2018, the Committee approved a one-time cash bonus of $500,000 to Mr. Parker under theNo Repricing: Our Omnibus Incentive Plan for his past contributions todoes not permit the Company’s achievements,repricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
No Hedging of Shares: Our insider trading policy prohibits all employees, including the integration of the legacy Springleafexecutive officers, and OneMain operations;directors from engaging in April 2018, the Committee accelerated the vesting of 139,227 RSUs previously granted to Mr. Parker so that they would automatically vest in full upon the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction, which occurred on June 25, 2018. Vesting of these RSUs was previously scheduled for February 20, 2019, February 20, 2020 and June 18, 2021. The Company determined that the modification of the vesting terms did not result in any additional compensation expense. In June 2018, the Committee also approved a grant of 44,536 RSUs to Mr. Parker under the Omnibus Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000 for his efforts in completing the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention tool. These RSUs were scheduled to vest over three years with 50% vesting on June 18, 2018. The remainder of RSUs subject to this grant were forfeited upon Mr. Parker’s resignation as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.

2018 Compensationhedging or short-term speculative trading of our President and Chief Executive Officer

The compensation of Mr. Shulman, our President and CEO since September 8, 2018, is described under “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Employment Agreement with Mr. Shulman.”

Annual Incentive Plan Compensation

The Annual Plan is a sub-plan of the Omnibus Incentive Plan in which our NEOs, other than Messrs. Levine and Shulman, participated during 2018. The executive officers who participate in the Annual Plan are eligible to receive annual incentive compensation contingent upon the attainment of specific, pre-established financial metrics and strategic objectives relevant to the responsibilities of each such executive officer, each of which is intended to drive sustainable growth and create long-term stockholder value. We have historically settled awards under our Annual Plan partially in cash and partially in the form of equity-based instruments, including RSUs and restricted stock awards (“RSAs”). Our use of equity-based instruments in partial settlement of awards under our Annual Plan ties annual performance to the Company’s long-term success by generally basing the magnitude of such payouts of Annual Plan awards on the applicable NEO’s performance during the prior year and imposing continued service-based vesting conditions, generally over a three year period, on such awards.

For 2018, the financial metrics and strategic objectives for Annual Plan awards were Adjusted Pre-Tax Income for the Consumer & Insurance (“C & I”) segment, C & I Ending Net Receivables, C & I Net Credit Loss (%) and C & I Operating Expense Adjusted for Deferred Acquisition Costs, as well as the assessment of the achievement of strategic objectives.

C & I Adjusted Pre-Tax Income, C & I Ending Net Receivables, C & I Net Credit Loss (%) and C & I Operating Expense Adjusted for Deferred Acquisition Costs are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of SEC rules. Please refer to pages 54-56 of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2019 for a description of C & I Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings and C & I Ending Net Receivables. C & I Net Credit Loss (%) represents the aggregate dollar amount of loans charged off in our C & I segment during 2018 less the aggregate dollar amount of monies recovered in our C & I segment during 2018 from loans previously charged off, divided by Average Net Receivables for 2018. C & I Operating Expense Adjusted for Deferred Acquisition Costs represents total operating expenses for our C & I segment during 2018 adjusted for deferred acquisition costs incurred during 2018 in connection with originating loans.

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the Annual Plan, annual compensation targets are set for each participant and a performance range with accompanying variability of compensation is determined for each metric. The Annual Plan provides that the first $500,000 payable to recipients is payable in cash. Amounts in excess of $500,000 up to and including $1,000,000 are paid in RSUs, and any amounts above $1,000,000 are evenly split between cash and RSUs. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installmentssecurities, subject, to the recipient’s continued service through each applicable vesting date.

For 2018, Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler each were eligible to earn a target bonus amount of $1,600,000. Mr. Borchers was eligible to earn a target bonus amount of $650,000. Mr. Anderson’s target bonus was $450,000 after effecting a 50% pro-ration for a six-month performance period from July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The targets were set, in part, to keep the executives focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period after the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive. Possible payouts under the Annual Plan ranged between 0% and 150% of the target level. Payouts were based on Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Borchers and Anderson’s performance relative to the attainment of the applicable metrics and objectives and the Company’s performance for the year.

In February 2019, the Committee approved payments to Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Borchers and Anderson in respect of their Annual Plan awards based upon the achievement of financial metrics and the assessment of the achievement of strategic objectives. In settlement of their respective Annual Plan awards, Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler each received cash payments of $1,016,800 and grants of 33,893 RSUs in February 2019 with a grant date fair value of $1,016,800, for a total payout of $2,033,600 for each executive. In settlement of their Annual Plan awards, Messrs. Borchers and Anderson each received a cash payment of $500,000 and grants of RSUs in February 2019 with a value of $317,700 (Mr. Borchers) and $71,950 (Mr. Anderson), for a total payout of $817,700 (Mr. Borchers) and $571,950 (Mr. Anderson).

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The financial metrics and strategic objectives achievement results approved by the Committee for the Annual Plan awards were as follows as reflected in the table below:

C & I Adjusted Pre-Tax Income - metric was achieved above the target (150% achievement level),
C & I Ending Net Receivables - metric was achieved above the target (123.3% achievement level),
C & I Net Credit Loss (%) - metric was achieved above the target (150% achievement level), and
C & I Operating Expense Adjusted for Deferred Acquisition Costs - metric was achieved below the target (92% achievement level).


(1)The weightings for Mr. Borchers differ from those of Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler and Anderson to emphasize his responsibilities for Branch-level performance.

Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

In July 2018, the Committee approved a performance-based equity compensation program with a measurement period of 2018 (the “Equity Program”) for Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler, who each received performance-based equity compensation awards with vesting contingent upon the attainment of specific, pre-established performance measures discussed below. Due in part to our concentrated stock ownership, we utilized C & I Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share and Tangible Leverage Ratio (each as defined below) as the performance measures for the Equity Program. Each of these measures was weighted equally for 2018 awards under the Equity Program. For 2018, Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler received performance-based RSUs that were settled in the form of service-based RSUs vesting ratably over three years beginning in February 2019. For 2018 performance, Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler were eligible to receive service-based RSUs upon settlement of their performance-based RSUs with grant

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

date fair values at target of $1,250,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, with possible payouts between 0% and 150% of the target level. As with annual incentive plan compensation, the targets were designed, in part, to keep Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period of the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive.

C & I Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share was calculated by dividing C & I Adjusted After-Tax Earnings for 2018 by the weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding during 2018. Our Tangible Leverage Ratio was calculated by subtracting the carrying value of junior subordinated debt at December 31, 2018 from the carrying value of our total long-term debt at December 31, 2018 to arrive at Adjusted Debt, then dividing Adjusted Debt by Adjusted Tangible Common Equity, which is calculated by subtracting goodwill and other intangible assets at December 31, 2018 from total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2018, and then adding the carrying value of junior subordinated debt at December 31, 2018 to the result.

The Committee certified achievement of each of the C & I Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share metric and the Tangible Leverage Ratio metric above the target level of performance. Based on the performance achievement levels, the Committee approved the settlement of the performance-based RSUs granted to Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler with service-based RSUs at 130% of target. The RSUs vest ratably in three annual installments beginning in February 2019, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

The following table shows the target achievement results of the NEOs who were participants in our 2018 Equity Program:


In early 2019, the Committee awarded Mr. Anderson 9,750 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $292,500, in recognition of performance in 2018 after considering the Company’s achievement against the Equity Program performance goals. Mr. Anderson’s award reflects a 50% pro-ration reflecting a six-month performance period from July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The RSUs will vest in three equal annual installments, subject to Mr. Anderson’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Although these RSUs were granted based on an assessment of 2018 performance, in accordance with SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the value of this award is excluded from the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 since the award opportunity was granted

33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to Mr. Anderson following the conclusion of 2018. Accordingly, these RSUs will be reflected as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019.

We believe our use of equity-based instruments that have continued service-based vesting conditions and that are issued in partial settlement of Annual Plan awards and Equity Program awards, as well as our Executive Officer Stock Ownership Policy and our prior year grants of performance-based RSUs, RSUs and fully vested RSUs, closely align the interests of our management with those of the Company and our stockholders by ensuring that our management has a meaningful equity ownership stake in the Company.

Payout of SFH Incentive Units

Certain of our NEOs held SFH Incentive Units. These SFH Incentive Units were profit interests that provided the holders thereof with benefits (in the form of distributions) only if SFH made distributions to one or more of its common members that exceeded specified threshold amounts.

Holders of SFH Incentive Units were generally entitled to receive distributions in respect of their SFH Incentive Units only if they were employed by us or one of our affiliates on, and have not given or received notice of termination of such employment as of, the date the distribution is paid. The closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction on June 25, 2018 triggered final distributions to holders of SFH Incentive Units and resulted in cash distributions to our NEOs in the following amounts in respect of their SFH Incentive Units:

Name
SFH Incentive Unit
Payout
Jay N. Levine
$
71,237,675
(1)
Scott T. Parker
$
2,113,057
 
John C. Anderson
$
35,618,837
(1)
Robert A. Hurzeler
$
1,056,529
 
(1)Includes $2,600,305 and $1,300,152, respectively, in distributions in respect of Messrs. Levine’s and Anderson’s SFH Incentive Units as a result of earlier sales of shares of Company common stock by SFH during 2018.

The SFH Incentive Units were designed to further align the interests of the holders thereof with those of our stockholders by delivering value only to the extent that distributions by SFH to its owners exceeded certain thresholds, including distributions made in connection with sales of Company common stock by SFH to the Acquisition Entity at the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction.

Although these distributions were paid by SFH, we are required to recognize such distributions as stock-based compensation expense in our consolidated financial statements under GAAP, and such distributions are reflected in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018. Distributions on these SFH Incentive Units are not tax deductible by us. Nevertheless, because the holders of SFH Incentive Units only received distributions in respect of such SFH Incentive Units if certain thresholds were exceeded at the time that SFH sold its holdings of Company common stock, we believe these SFH Incentive Units helped support our pay for performance culture.

Benefits

All of our NEOs are eligible to participate in our general tax-qualified, defined contribution retirement savings 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”). We match a percentage of each participant’s contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to the statutory limits.

Our defined benefit plans include a tax-qualified pension plan (the “Retirement Plan”) and a non-qualified Excess Retirement Income Plan (the “Excess Plan”) (collectively the “Pension Plans”). Each of the Pension Plans provides for a yearly benefit based on years of service and average final salary.

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Pension Plans and their benefits are described in greater detail below under “—Pension Benefits for 2018”. As of December 31, 2012, which was prior to eligibility for all our NEOs other than Messrs. Levine, Borchers and Anderson, the Pension Plans were frozen with respect to both salary and service levels to prevent future increases in the benefit liabilities established under the applicable Pension Plan.

Each of our executive officers is eligible to participate in our various group health and welfare benefit plans and fringe benefit programs that are generally available to all of our team members on a non-discriminatory basis.

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, including Messrs. Shulman and Hurzeler and Mr. Parker, our former Executive Vice President and CFO. While we do not maintain a policy of entering into employment agreements with each of our executive officers, we believe the use of employment agreements are appropriate and useful under certain circumstances to attract and retain our executive officers.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Shulman

On July 10, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Shulman pursuant to which he began serving as our President and CEO on September 8, 2018 (the “start date”). The terms of the agreement reflect advice from Pearl Meyer, consideration of the terms of Mr. Shulman’s compensation arrangements with his prior employer and the results of negotiations between the parties to the agreement.

The employment agreement provides Mr. Shulman with an annual base salary of $800,000 and eligibility for an annual target bonus of $5,500,000, payable in cash, RSUs and performance-based RSUs subject to achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. The cash and RSU portions of the annual target bonus total $3,666,667 payable equally in cash and RSUs. In 2018, the target bonus (i) for Mr. Shulman’s OMH tenure was prorated for the period from the start date through December 31, 2018 and was increased by multiplying the pro-rated bonus amount by the performance factor under the Annual Plan (1.271); and (ii) includes an additional amount equal to two-thirds of Mr. Shulman’s target bonus at his prior employer, prorated for the period from January 1, 2018 to the start date. The performance-based RSUs portion of the annual bonus of $1,833,333 is granted annually beginning in 2019 and no later than March 31 of each year. Mr. Shulman did not receive a performance-based RSU grant for 2018. Accordingly, the 2019 grant of performance-based RSUs is equal to $1,833,333 plus (i) a pro rata portion of such amount related to the period in 2018 from the start date through December 31, 2018 multiplied by the performance factor under the Equity Program (1.30), and (ii) a pro rata portion of one-third of Mr. Shulman’s target bonus at his prior employer. The formula resulted in a performance-based RSU grant in February 2019 with a target value of $3,106,000.

In consideration of the commencement of Mr. Shulman’s employment with the Company, and in part to compensate Mr. Shulman for equity awards forfeited at his prior employer, Mr. Shulman received a one-time equity grant of 84,697 RSUs with an aggregate grant date fair value of $3,000,000, which vest as follows: 50% vested on December 31, 2018; 25% are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2019; and 25% are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2020. If Mr. Shulman’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause or Mr. Shulman resigns without good reason (as defined in the employment agreement) on or after December 31, 2018, but on or before December 31, 2019, Mr. Shulman will be required to pay the Company the fair market value (as of the termination date) of the number of shares he received (after tax withholding) in connection with the portion of the grant that vested on December 31, 2018.

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As provided in the employment agreement, the Committee also approved a one-time grant to Mr. Shulman of cash-settled options with respect to 650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (in three tranches of 300,000, 225,000 and 125,000 shares) that are subject to certain vesting conditions relating to the trading price of the Company’s common stock and the portion of the Company’s common stock owned by stockholders other than the Acquisition Entity, as well as certain other terms and conditions. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), the grant date fair value of this cash-settled option award is zero because the satisfaction of the required event-based performance condition was not considered probable as of the grant date. Accordingly, there is no grant date fair value below or in excess of the assumed value of zero that could be calculated and disclosed.

Pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company agreed to reimburse Mr. Shulman for his reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the negotiation of the employment agreement and all related agreements.

The employment agreement provides that Mr. Shulman will receive certain payments and benefits in the event of a termination of his employment under specific circumstances. If Mr. Shulman’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for “cause” (as defined in the agreement, but not including a termination of employment due to death or disability) or he resigns for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement and summarized below), and if Mr. Shulman executes a general release of claims in a form acceptable to us and continues to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, then he would be entitled to: (i) a severance payment equal to $2,633,333, payable in equal installments over a 24-month period in accordance with the Company’s payroll (or, if such termination occurs within the 24-month period following a change in control (as defined in the agreement), a single lump sum); (ii) any earned but unpaid annual bonus for the calendar year immediately preceding the termination; (iii) an amount equal to two-thirds of the average annual bonus earned in respect of the three years completed prior to the year of termination (or, if Mr. Shulman has been employed for less than three years as of such termination, the number of years completed prior to the year of termination; provided, however, that if the year of termination is 2018 or 2019, the amount shall be equal to two-thirds of the target amount of his annual bonus), pro-rated based on the number of days in which Mr. Shulman was employed during such year paid at the same time such bonuses are normally paid in accordance with the normal practices of the Company with regard to paying bonuses to similarly situated executives subject to certain adjustments; and (iv) a lump sum payment equal to 12-months of COBRA premiums.

For purposes of Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement, “good reason” means, in summary: (i) a material reduction in his duties, authorities, responsibilities or reporting relationships; (ii) the reduction of his base salary or annual bonus opportunity (in each case, other than an across-the-board reduction affecting all senior management of the Company which reduction results in the decrease of his base salary or annual bonus opportunity, as applicable, of less than 10%); (iii) relocation of his principal location of employment by more than 50 miles (unless such new location is closer to his primary residence in New York City); (iv) the failure to nominate him as a member of the board of directors of the Company; or (v) the failure to pay him compensation when due under the terms of his employment agreement.

Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Shulman is bound by certain restrictive covenants including confidentiality, non-disparagement, work product and, during the term of his employment and for a period of two years thereafter, non-solicitation of employees, consultants and customers and non-competition. The Company is bound by a non-disparagement covenant.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Parker

On October 12, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Parker pursuant to which he served as our Executive Vice President and CFO until his resignation effective on March 26, 2019. The initial term of the agreement was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2019, and provided

36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

for automatic renewal for an additional one-year term thereafter unless either party provided notice of non-renewal to the other at least 90 days before expiration of the then-current term.

Mr. Parker’s employment agreement provided for an annual base salary of $400,000, subject to adjustment as provided in the agreement. Mr. Parker was also to receive a bonus under the Company’s annual incentive program, subject in each case to reasonable performance objectives agreed upon between the CEO and Mr. Parker each year. The agreement also provided that Mr. Parker would be eligible to participate in all retirement and welfare benefit plans and paid-time off policies as are made available by us to our senior executives.

Mr. Parker’s employment agreement also provided that if his employment was terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or by Mr. Parker for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement and summarized below), and if Mr. Parker executed a general release of claims in a form acceptable to us and continued to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, he would receive (i) continued base salary payments for 12 months, (ii) any earned but unpaid annual bonus for the prior calendar year, and (iii) the annual bonus for the year in which such termination occurred, pro-rated based on the average of the annual bonuses paid to him for the three years prior to such termination (or such lesser number of years for which he received a non-zero annual bonus, if applicable). Mr. Parker also was eligible to participate in the Executive Severance Plan, provided that any severance amounts payable to Mr. Parker under the Executive Severance Plan would be reduced by the severance amounts payable to Mr. Parker under the terms of his employment agreement. As noted above, Mr. Parker resigned as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019. Mr. Parker did not receive severance benefits in connection with such resignation.

Mr. Parker’s employment agreement provided that he will not compete with us for one year following notice of his termination of employment for any reason. In addition, the agreement provides that Mr. Parker will not solicit our employees, consultants, independent contractors, service providers or current or prospective clients or customers for two-years following the termination of his employment for any reason. The agreement also contains standard perpetual provisions relating to confidentiality, intellectual property and non-disparagement.

For purposes of Mr. Parker’s employment agreement, “good reason” means, in summary, (i) a material reduction in his level of responsibility, title or authority, (ii) any material breach by the Company of its obligations under the employment agreement, or (iii) relocation of his principal location of employment by more than 60 miles.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Hurzeler

On April 13, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hurzeler effective as of January 1, 2016. The agreement provides that Mr. Hurzeler will continue to serve as our Executive Vice President, Auto Lending under the agreement for an initial term beginning on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2018. Mr. Hurzeler became our Chief Operating Officer on June 2, 2016. The agreement automatically renews for additional one-year terms thereafter unless either party provides notice of non-renewal to the other at least 90 days before expiration of the then-current term. The agreement auto-renewed on January 1, 2019.

The employment agreement provides that Mr. Hurzeler will continue to receive an annual base salary of $350,000, subject to adjustment as provided in the agreement, and will be eligible to receive a minimum annual bonus of $400,000 for each full calendar year during the term of the agreement, subject to his continued employment on the payment date. The agreement also provides that Mr. Hurzeler will continue to be eligible to participate in all retirement and welfare benefit plans and paid-time off policies as are made available to the Company’s other similarly situated executives during the term of the agreement.

37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The employment agreement also provides that if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) and if Mr. Hurzeler executes a general release of claims in a form acceptable to us and continues to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, he will receive (i) continued base salary payments for twelve months and (ii) a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination, based on the average of the annual bonuses paid to him for the three years prior to termination (or such lesser number of years for which he received a non-zero annual bonus, if applicable).

The employment agreement provides that Mr. Hurzeler will not compete with us for three years following the termination of his employment by us for cause or a voluntary termination by Mr. Hurzeler (or one year following termination by us for any other reason). In addition, the agreement provides that Mr. Hurzeler will not solicit our employees, consultants, independent contractors, service providers or current or prospective clients or customers for three years following the termination of his employment by us for cause or a voluntary termination by Mr. Hurzeler (or two-years following termination by us for any other reason). The agreement also contains standard perpetual provisions relating to confidentiality, intellectual property and non-disparagement.

Letter Agreement with Mr. Levine

We also entered into a letter agreement with our non-executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Levine, which is described under the caption “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Letter Agreement with Mr. Levine.”

Consideration of Most Recent Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders were provided with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs for 2016. Of the votes cast at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the say-on-pay vote yielded approximately 89% approval. Notwithstanding this favorable vote, we continue to seek input from our stockholders to understand their views with respect to our approach to executive compensation, and in particular in connection with the Committee’s efforts to tie compensation to performance. The next Say-on-Pay Vote will be at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Stockholders will also vote on Say-on-Pay Frequency at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table for 2018

The table below summarizes information regarding compensation for the years 2016 through 2018, as applicable, for each of our NEOs.

Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
Option
Awards
($)(4)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(5)
Pension Value
& Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(6)
All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
Total
($)
Douglas H. Shulman
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
2018
 
 
215,385
 
 
2,193,333
 
 
3,000,000
 
 
0
 
 
317,973
 
 
24,015
 
 
5,750,706
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Jay N. Levine(8)
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
 
2018
 
 
292,308
 
 
71,240,275
 
 
71,532,583
 
 
2017
 
 
400,000
 
 
6,035
 
 
14,435
 
 
420,470
 
 
2016
 
 
400,000
 
 
11,499
 
 
10,600
 
 
422,099
 
Scott T. Parker(9)
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
2018
 
 
400,000
 
 
500,000
 
 
2,750,000
 
 
2,033,600
 
 
2,124,609
 
 
7,808,209
 
 
2017
 
 
400,000
 
 
6,250,000
 
 
1,863,801
 
 
11,800
 
 
8,525,601
 
 
2016
 
 
400,000
 
 
1,350,000
 
 
11,600
 
 
1,761,600
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
 
2018
 
 
350,000
 
 
1,000,000
 
 
2,033,600
 
 
1,068,561
 
 
4,452,161
 
 
2017
 
 
350,000
 
 
2,000,000
 
 
1,863,801
 
 
15,426
 
 
4,229,227
 
 
2016
 
 
350,000
 
 
713,400
 
 
11,600
 
 
1,075,000
 
John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
 
2018
 
 
350,000
 
 
571,950
 
 
35,623,731
 
 
36,545,681
 
 
2017
 
 
350,000
 
 
2,752
 
 
11,394
 
 
364,146
 
 
2016
 
 
350,000
 
 
1,024
 
 
12,063
 
 
363,087
 
Bradford D. Borchers
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations
 
2018
 
 
350,000
 
 
817,700
 
 
12,032
 
 
1,179,732
 
 
2017
 
 
350,000
 
 
742,904
 
 
128,817
 
 
15,341
 
 
1,237,062
 
 
2016
 
 
350,000
 
 
475,275
 
 
20,152
 
 
11,600
 
 
857,027
 
(1)Mr. Shulman became President and CEO on September 8, 2018 with an annual base salary of $800,000. Mr. Levine assumed the role of non-executive Chairman on September 8, 2018. The numbers in the “Salary” column for Messrs. Shulman and Levine represent their pro rata salary for 2018. On February 7, 2018, the Board determined not to designate Mr. Borchers as an “executive officer” within the meaning of Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(2)For Mr. Shulman, the amount in this column represents his incentive bonus under his employment agreement but does not include the increase resulting from applying the performance factor under the Annual Plan. The award was paid in cash in the amount of $1,096,666 and in RSUs in the amount of $1,096,666. See note (5) below. For 2018, this column represents a one-time cash bonus award for Mr. Parker for his past contributions to the Company’s achievements, including the integration of the legacy Springleaf and OneMain operations. For 2016, the amount in this column represents a guaranteed cash bonus paid to Mr. Parker pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
(3)The amount in this column for Mr. Shulman reflects a replacement equity award per his employment agreement. The amount for 2018 for Mr. Parker represents the grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs assuming achievement of target performance of $1,250,000. If achievement at the maximum level of performance had been assumed, the grant date fair value of Mr. Parker’s 2018 performance-based RSUs would have been $1,875,000. Actual achievement results approved by the Committee in February 2019 resulted in settlement of Mr. Parker’s 2018 performance-based RSUs at 130% of target level with RSUs that vest ratably in three annual installments beginning February 20, 2019. The amount for 2018 for Mr. Parker also includes a one-time equity award of 44,536 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000 approved in June 2018 for his efforts in completing the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention tool. These RSUs were scheduled to vest over three years with 50% vesting on June 18, 2018. The remainder of RSUs subject to this grant were forfeited upon Mr. Parker’s resignation as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019. The amount for 2018 for Mr. Hurzeler represents the grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs assuming achievement at target performance of $1,000,000. If achievement at the maximum level of performance had been assumed, the grant date fair value of Mr. Hurzeler’s 2018 performance-based RSUs would have been $1,500,000. Actual achievement results approved by the Committee in February 2019 resulted in settlement of Mr. Hurzeler’s 2018 performance-based RSUs at 130% of target level with RSUs that vest ratably in three annual installments beginning February 20, 2019. The targets for Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler were designed, in part, to keep them focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period of the

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive. For a summary of the assumptions used in the valuation of these equity-based awards, please see note 21 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

(4)The grant date fair value for Mr. Shulman’s option awards granted during 2018 is calculated based on the probable satisfaction of the performance conditions for such awards as of the date of grant. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value of Mr. Shulman’s 2018 option awards is zero because the satisfaction of the required event-based performance conditions was not considered probable as of the grant date. Accordingly, there is no grant date fair value below or in excess of the amount reflected in the table above for Mr. Shulman that could be calculated and disclosed.
(5)Except for Mr. Shulman, amounts in this column represent amounts paid in respect of awards granted under the Annual Plan. For Mr. Shulman, the amount in this column represents the increase in Mr. Shulman’s incentive bonus resulting from applying the performance factor under the Annual Plan. Mr. Parker’s Annual Plan award payout in the amount of $2,033,600 was paid in 2019 partially in cash in the amount of $1,016,800 and partially in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $1,016,800. The RSUs subject to this grant were forfeited upon Mr. Parker’s resignation as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019. Mr. Hurzeler’s Annual Plan award payout in the amount of $2,033,600 was paid in 2019 partially in cash in the amount of $1,016,800 and partially in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $1,016,800. Mr. Anderson’s Annual Plan award payout in the amount of $571,950 was paid in 2019 partially in cash in the amount of $500,000 and partially in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $71,950. Mr. Anderson’s target award ($900,000) was pro-rated at 50% to $450,000 to reflect a six-month performance period of July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. Mr. Borchers’ Annual Plan award payout in the amount of $817,700 was paid in 2019 partially in cash in the amount of $500,000 and partially in the form of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $317,700. The RSUs granted in partial payment of Annual Plan awards vest in three annual installments. The targets for Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Borchers and Anderson were set, in part, to keep the executives focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period after the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive.
(6)Messrs. Levine, Borchers and Anderson are the only NEOs who were eligible to participate in the Pension Plans before they were closed to new participants on December 31, 2012. The change in the pension values for Messrs. Levine, Borchers and Anderson for 2018 was negative, $(4,194), $(87,755) and $(1,430), respectively. The amounts were calculated using the discount rates of 4.13% for the Retirement Plan and 3.93% for the Excess Plan as of December 31, 2018; discount rates of 4.05% for the Retirement Plan and 3.67% for the Excess Plan as of December 31, 2016; and discount rates of 4.27% for the Retirement Plan and 3.83% for the Excess Plan as of December 31, 2017.
(7)The amounts shown in this column include the following:
Name
Year
$
401(k)
Match
$
SFH Incentive
Payment(a)
$
Other
Compensation(b)
$
Total All Other
Compensation
$
Douglas H. Shulman
 
2018
 
 
24,015
 
 
24,015
 
Jay N. Levine
 
2018
 
 
1,846
 
 
71,237,675
 
 
754
 
 
71,240,275
 
Scott T. Parker
 
2018
 
 
11,000
 
 
2,113,057
 
 
552
 
 
2,124,609
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
 
2018
 
 
11,000
 
 
1,056,529
 
 
1,032
 
 
1,068,561
 
John C. Anderson
 
2018
 
 
1,615
 
 
35,618,837
 
 
3,279
 
 
35,623,731
 
Bradford D. Borchers
 
2018
 
 
11,000
 
 
1,032
 
 
12,032
 
(a)For further details on SFH Incentive Payments see “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Payouts of SFH Incentive Units.”
(b)Other than for Mr. Shulman, the values in this column represent employer-paid health spending account contributions and fringe benefit imputed income pursuant to group health and welfare benefit programs that are available generally to all employees. For Mr. Shulman the value in this column represents reimbursement for attorneys’ fees in connection with his employment agreement and includes $127 in imputed income on his life insurance policy.
(8)The amount in for Mr. Levine for 2018 does not include his compensation as Chairman of the Board, which is disclosed in the “Director Compensation Table for 2018” below.
(9)Mr. Parker resigned as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2018(1)

The table below summarizes information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during 2018.

Name
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)(4)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
of Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
Douglas H. Shulman
President and Chief Executive Officer
9/8/2018
 
84,697
 
 
3,000,000
 
2/5/2019
 
317,973
 
Jay N. Levine(5)
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Scott T. Parker
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
7/24/2018
 
800,000
 
 
1,600,000
 
 
2,400,000
 
6/18/2018
 
44,536
 
 
1,500,000
 
7/24/2018
 
17,811
 
 
35,622
 
 
53,434
 
 
1,250,000
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
7/24/2018
 
800,000
 
 
1,600,000
 
 
2,400,000
 
7/24/2018
 
14,249
 
 
28,498
 
 
42,747
 
 
1,000,000
 
John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
7/24/2018
 
225,000
 
 
450,000
 
 
675,000
 
Bradford D. Borchers
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations
7/24/2018
 
325,000
 
 
650,000
 
 
975,000
 
(1)Excludes SFH Incentive Units.
(2)Represents 2018 awards under the Annual Plan, other than for Mr. Shulman. The Committee approved a pro-rated incentive payout to Mr. Shulman in 2019 as reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 above. The Annual Plan awards were approved in July 2018 for the 2018 performance year with a target opportunity for Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler of $1,600,000 and maximum opportunity of $2,400,000 and a target opportunity for Mr. Borchers of $650,000 and a maximum opportunity of $975,000. The Annual Plan award approved for Mr. Anderson had a target opportunity of $450,000 and maximum opportunity of $675,000. Mr. Anderson’s award was pro-rated at 50% for an adjusted performance period of July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. Based on Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers’ achievements under the terms of their Annual Plan awards, the Committee approved payouts in full settlement of their Annual Plan awards as reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 above. The targets for Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers were set, in part, to keep the executives focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period after the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive. Any unvested RSUs granted to Mr. Parker under the Annual Plan were forfeited upon his resignation as our Executive Vice President and CFO effective March 26, 2019.
(3)Represents 2018 awards of performance-based RSUs under the Equity Program. The Equity Program awards were approved in July 2018 for the 2018 performance year. Mr. Parker’s 2018 Equity Program award had a target opportunity with a grant date fair value of $1,250,000 (35,622 shares) and a maximum opportunity with a grant date fair value of $1,875,000 (53,434 shares). Mr. Hurzeler’s 2018 Equity Program award had a target opportunity with a grant date fair value of $1,000,000 (28,498 shares) and a maximum opportunity with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000 (42,747 shares). In 2019, following a determination by the Committee of Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler’s achievement under the terms of their 2018 Equity Program awards, the Committee approved the achievement of the applicable performance metrics at 130%, and the performance-based RSUs were settled in service-based RSUs that vest in three annual installments beginning on February 20, 2019. The targets for Messrs. Parker and, Hurzeler were set, in part, to keep the executives focused on the Company’s performance through the transition period after the Apollo-Värde Transaction and as a retention incentive. Any unvested RSUs granted to Mr. Parker under the Equity Program were forfeited upon his resignation as our Executive Vice President and CFO effective March 26, 2019.

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(4)The amount in this column for Mr. Shulman is a one-time equity replacement award of RSUs per his employment agreement. The amount for 2018 for Mr. Parker is a one-time equity award of RSUs approved in June 2018 for his efforts in completing the Apollo-Värde Transaction.
(5)Does not include Mr. Levine’s RSU grant during 2018 pursuant to his letter agreement. The RSU grant for his service as Chairman of the Board per the letter agreement is disclosed in the “Director Compensation Table for 2018” below.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2018

The following table summarizes the equity awards made to our NEOs that were unvested and outstanding as of December 31, 2018.

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(1)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(1)
Name
Exercisable
(#)
Unexercisable
(#)
Douglas H. Shulman – President and Chief Executive Officer
 
650,000
(2)
 
33.40
 
 
7/12/2028
 
 
42,349
(3)
 
1,028,657
 
Jay N. Levine –
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
 
2,296
(4)
 
55,770
 
Scott T. Parker – Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
120,003
(5)
 
2,914,873
 
 
35,622
(8)
 
865,258
 
Robert A. Hurzeler – Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
 
142,843
(6)
 
3,469,656
 
 
28,498
(9)
 
692,216
 
John C. Anderson – Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
Bradford D. Borchers – Executive Vice President, Branch Operations
 
7,669
(7)
 
186,280
 
(1)Based on the closing market price of Company common stock on December 31, 2018 of $24.29 per share.
(2)The options are in three tranches (300,000, 225,000 and 125,000) subject to vesting conditions relating to the portion of the Company’s common stock owned by stockholders other than the Acquisition Entity and the Company achieving a volume-weighted average trading price (VWAP) over a consecutive six-month period. The VWAP goal for Tranche I is $55.00, Tranche II is $70.00 and Tranche III is $85.00.
(3)Represents 42,348 RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 21,174 RSUs are scheduled to vest December 2019 and 21,175 are scheduled to vest in December 2020.
(4)Represents 2,296 RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 2,296 RSUs vested in January 2019.
(5)Represents 120,003 RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 10,131 RSUs vested in February 2019, 10,131 are scheduled to vest in February 2020 and 10,132 are scheduled to vest in February 2021; 19,165 vested in March 2019 and 19,166 are scheduled to vest in March 2020; 11,134 are scheduled to vest in June 2019 and 2020; and 29,010 are scheduled to vest in November 2019. Any unvested RSUs held by Mr. Parker were forfeited upon his resignation as our Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.
(6)Represents 30,446 RSAs and 112,397 RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. The vesting schedule for the RSAs is as follows: 16,187 RSAs vested in February 2019 and 14,259 are scheduled to vest in February 2020. The vesting

42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 52,308 vested in January 2019; 9,808 vested in February 2019, 9,808 are scheduled to vest in February 2020 and 9,809 are scheduled to vest in February 2021; 15,332 vested in March 2019 and 15,332 are scheduled to vest in March 2020.

(7)Represents 7,669 RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 2,556 vested in February 2019; 2,556 are scheduled to vest in February 2020; and 2,557 are scheduled to vest in February 2021.
(8)Represents 35,622 performance-based RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. These performance-based RSUs were settled in February 2019 at 130% of target in the form of 46,309 RSUs. The vesting schedule for these RSUs is as follows: 15,436 RSUs vested in February 2019; 15,436 are scheduled to vest in February 2020; and 15,437 are scheduled to vest in February 2021. Any unvested RSUs held by Mr. Parker were forfeited upon his resignation as our Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019.
(9)Represents 28,498 performance-based RSUs that were unvested as of December 31, 2018. These performance-based RSUs were settled in February 2019 at 130% of target in the form of 37,047 RSUs. The vesting schedule for these RSUs is as follows: 12,349 RSUs vested in February 2019 and 12,349 are scheduled to vest in February 2020 and 2021.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested for 2018(1)

We had no stock options that were exercised during 2018. The table below shows the number and fair value of RSAs and RSUs that vested in 2018.

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
Douglas H. Shulman(2)
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
42,348
 
 
1,026,939
 
Jay N. Levine
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott T. Parker(3)
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
245,881
 
 
8,152,437
 
Robert A. Hurzeler(4)
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
 
87,208
 
 
2,484,013
 
John C. Anderson
Executive Vice President, Legal, Compliance and Operational Risk
Bradford D. Borchers(5)
Executive Vice President, Branch Operations
 
32,928
 
 
881,684
 
(1)Excludes SFH Incentive Units.
(2)Includes 42,348 RSUs that vested on December 31, 2018 with a value of $24.25 per share on the vesting date.
(3)Includes 58,479 RSUs that vested on February 20, 2018 with a value of $33.01 per share on the vesting date; 19,165 RSUs that vested on March 20, 2018 with a value of $31.14 per share on the vesting date; 139,227 RSUs that vested on June 25, 2018 with a value of $33.29 per share on the vesting date; and 29,010 RSUs that vested on November 4, 2018 with a value of $29.34 per share on the vesting date.
(4)Includes 1,929 RSAs that vested on February 19, 2018 with a value of $33.01 per share on the vesting date; 14,257 RSAs that vested on February 20, 2018 with a value of $33.01 per share on the vesting date; 52,308 RSUs that vested on January 2, 2018 with a value of $25.99 per share on the vesting date; 3,382 RSUs that vested on February 16, 2018 with a value of $33.35 per share on the vesting date; and 15,332 RSUs that vested on March 20, 2018 with a value of $31.14 per share on the vesting date.

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(5)Includes 29,411 RSUs that vested on January 2, 2018 with a value of $25.99 per share on the vesting date; and 3,517 RSUs that vested on February 16, 2018 with a value of $33.35 per share on the vesting date.

Pension Benefits for 2018

The Pension Plans were frozen effective December 31, 2012, prior to the eligibility of our NEOs other than Messrs. Levine, Borchers and Anderson. No additional participants have been or will be allowed entry into the plans, and no additional creditable service has been or will be awarded to Messrs. Levine, Borchers or Anderson after December 31, 2012. In accordance with SEC rules, the accumulated benefits are presented as if they were payable upon the NEO’s normal retirement at age 65.

Name
Plan Name
Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
(#)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($) (1)
Payments
During
the Last Fiscal
Year
($)
Douglas H. Shulman
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
Jay N. Levine
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
0.750
 
 
30,520
 
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
 
0.750
 
 
17,050
 
Scott T. Parker
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
Robert A. Hurzeler
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
John C. Anderson
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
0.750
 
 
23,925
 
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
Bradford D. Borchers
Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan
 
28.0
 
 
765,470
 
 
Springleaf Financial Services Excess Plan
 
28.0
 
 
151,648
 
(1)The Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan were each frozen on December 31, 2012. The pension valuation assumptions for 2018 include: (i) discount rates of 4.13% for the Retirement Plan and 3.93% for the Excess Plan, (ii) normal retirement age (65), or current age, if older, and (iii) RP-2006 mortality table with scale MP-2018 projection, post retirement only.

Pension Plan Benefit Formulas

The Retirement Plan and Excess Plan formulas range from 0.925% to 1.425% times average final compensation for each year of credited service accrued prior to December 31, 2012, up to 44-years. For participants who retire after the normal retirement age of 65, the retirement benefit is actuarially adjusted to reflect the later benefit commencement date.

For purposes of both the Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan, average final compensation is the average annual pensionable salary of a participant during those three consecutive years in the last 10-years of credited service, prior to the Pension Plans being frozen, that afford the highest such average. Final average compensation does not include amounts attributable to overtime pay, supplemental cash incentive payments, annual cash bonuses or long-term incentive awards.

Death and Disability Benefits

Each of the Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan also provides for death and disability benefits. The Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan generally provide a death benefit to active participants who die before age 65 equal to 50% of the benefit the participant would have received if he or she had terminated employment on the date of death, survived until his or her earliest retirement date and elected a 50% joint and survivor annuity.

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan, participants continued to accrue credited service through December 31, 2012 while receiving payments under SFI’s sponsored long-term disability plan or during periods of unpaid medical leave before reaching age 65 if they had at least 10-years of service when they become disabled. Participants who had less than 10-years of credited service when they become disabled continued to accrue credited service for a maximum of three additional years but no later than December 31, 2012.

As with other retirement benefits, in the case of death and disability benefits,certain hedging or monetization transactions, to pre-clearance of such transactions by the formula benefit under the Excess Plan is reduced by amounts payable under the Retirement Plan.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2018

We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plans in which any of ourGeneral Counsel.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
Restrictive Covenants: Our executive officers participate.

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control for 2018

The following table shows the payments and benefits that our NEOs would have been eligibleare subject to receiverestrictive covenants upon separation from us if their employment had been terminated or if a change in control of the Company, had occurred as of December 31, 2018. Additional information about Pension Plan benefits payable upon certain terminations is provided in “— Pension Benefits for 2018” above.

Name
Type of
Payment or
Benefit
Voluntary
Resignation
without
Good
Reason or
Early or
Normal
Retirement
($)
Termination
without
Cause
($)(2)(3)
Termination
for Good
Reason
($)(2)(3)
Change
in
Control
($)(4)
Termination
without
Cause
following
a Change
in Control
($)(2)(3)
Termination
for Good
Reason
following
a Change
in Control
($)(2)(3)
Termination
Due to
Disability
($)(3)(5)
Termination
Due to
Death
($)(3)(5)
Douglas H. Shulman
Severance Payment
 
3,123,846
 
 
3,123,846
 
 
3,123,846
 
 
3,123,846
 
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
Total
 
4,152,503
 
 
4,152,503
 
 
4,152,503
 
 
4,152,503
 
 
1,028,657
 
 
1,028,657
 
Jay N. Levine
Severance Payment
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
Total
Scott T. Parker(1)
Severance Payment
 
1,921,267
 
 
1,921,267
 
 
2,033,600
 
 
2,456,202
 
 
2,456,202
 
 
1,521,267
 
 
1,521,267
 
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
 
1,686,698
 
 
931,060
 
 
4,212,784
 
 
4,212,784
 
 
1,442,923
 
 
1,442,923
 
Total
 
3,607,965
 
 
1,921,267
 
 
2,964,660
 
 
6,668,986
 
 
6,668,986
 
 
2,964,190
 
 
2,964,190
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
Severance Payment
 
1,422,764
 
 
2,033,600
 
 
2,405,310
 
 
2,405,310
 
 
1,072,764
 
 
1,072,764
 
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
 
2,274,394
 
 
4,507,981
 
 
1,454,267
 
 
1,454,267
 
Total
 
3,697,158
 
 
2,033,600
 
 
6,913,291
 
 
2,405,310
 
 
2,527,031
 
 
2,527,031
 
John C. Anderson
Severance Payment
 
374,852
 
 
571,950
 
 
946,802
 
 
946,802
 
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
Total
 
374,852
 
 
571,950
 
 
946,802
 
 
946,802
 
Bradford D. Borchers
Severance Payment
 
372,324
 
 
817,700
 
 
1,190,024
 
 
1,190,024
 
Acceleration of Unvested Equity
 
62,085
 
 
186,280
 
 
186,280
 
 
186,280
 
Total
 
434,409
 
 
817,700
 
 
1,376,304
 
 
1,190,024
 
 
186,280
 
 
186,280
 
including non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disclosure obligations.
(1)Mr. Parker resigned as Executive Vice President and CFO effective on March 26, 2019. Mr. Parker did not receive severance benefits in connection with such resignation.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
(2)Severance payments for Messrs. Shulman, Parker and Hurzeler in event of a termination without cause or, for Messrs. Shulman and Parker, for good reason (whether or not in connection with a change in control) are based on the terms of their respective employment agreements or, for Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler, the Executive Severance Plan if severance payments are greater under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan. For Mr. Shulman, the severance payment is an aggregate amount equal to $2,633,333 payable over 24 months and an amount equal to two-thirds of the average Annual Bonus earned in the three years completed prior to the year of termination (however if the termination is in 2018 or 2019, the amount shall be equal to two-thirds of the target amount of the Annual Bonus) prorated by the number of days the executive served as an employee in such year plus a lump sum distribution equal to 12 months of premiums for COBRA continuation for Mr. Shulman and his dependents. For Mr. Parker, the severance payments under his employment agreement include continued base salary payments for 12 months ($400,000) and the average annual bonus for the previous

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

three years prior to the year of termination (or such lesser number of years for which he received a non-zero annual bonus) ($1,521,267). For Mr. Hurzeler, the severance payments under his employment agreement include continued base salary payments for 12 months ($350,000) and the average annual bonus for the previous three years prior to the year of termination ($1,072,764). As of December 31, 2018, Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers were eligible to receive severance benefits pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan and change of control protections under the Annual Plan and theDouble-Trigger Change-in-Control Provision: Our Omnibus Incentive Plan. Under the Executive Severance Plan uponhas a termination by the Company other than for cause, or within twelve months following a change in control, upon a termination by the Company other than for cause or by the participant for good reason, each executive receives base salary continuation for twelve months and a lump sum distribution equal to twelve months of premiums for COBRA continuation for the executive and his dependents at the rates in effect on the date of termination. The lump-sum COBRA premiums payable pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Plan to Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers are $22,602, $21,710, $24,852 and $22,324, respectively. The lump sum COBRA premium payable under the terms of Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement is $22,602. Severance payment amounts for Messrs. Shulman, Parker and Hurzeler in the event of a termination without cause (or, for Mr. Parker, a termination without cause or for good reason) in the absence of“double-trigger” accelerated vesting feature, meaning that both a change of control reflect amounts dueand an involuntary termination of employment must occur for awards to themvest.

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups: We do not provide gross-up payments to offset any “golden parachute” excise taxes potentially incurred by our executives in connection with a change in control.
38

2Fiscal 2021 Compensation Elements
The Committee designed a compensation program to provide our NEOs with target compensation that is competitive with that of the Peer Group and with actual compensation tied directly to the Company’s operating performance, stock price and TSR. Individual components of compensation may be greater or less than the target, and actual compensation delivered may vary significantly from the target based on Company or individual performance and changes in our stock price.
The following table presents the principal components and the purpose of each component of the 2021 total direct compensation to our executive officers:
ElementFormPurposePerformance Metrics*
���FixedBase SalaryCash

Competitive base pay to help attract and retain executive talent

Only fixed source of compensation
Vari­able – Annual Incen­tive
Com­pen­sa­tion
Cash IncentiveCash

Designed to link stockholder value creation with short-term incentive metrics evaluated annually for alignment with Company strategy
Annual financial performance metrics (80%)

C&I Capital Generation: 30%

C&I Net Charge-Offs: 15%

C&I Operating Expenses: 15%

C&I ROR: 15%

Customer Accounts: 5%
Qualitative strategic factors (20%)

Positioning for the future

Continuing to optimize our core business

Stabilizing our core business to accommodate growth

Continuing to maintain and strengthen the balance sheet

Driving our mission as a socially responsible company
RSUsStock

Designed to link stockholder value creation with short-term incentive metrics evaluated annually for alignment with Company strategy

Designed to forge a direct link between executive and stockholder interests by transforming executives into stockholders

Aids in executive retention
Vari­able – Long-Term,
Per­for­mance-Based Equity
Awards
PSUsStock

Establishes an equity component of total compensation that extends the executive’s decision-making vision beyond the current year to long-term growth and prosperity

Designed to forge a direct link between executive and stockholder interests by transforming executives into stockholders

Aids in executive retention
Economic Earnings Average Growth (67%)
Economic Average Unlevered Return (33%)
*
Refer to the Appendix for a description of these metrics, other than customer accounts, and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.
39

2021 Total Direct Compensation Components in Detail
The Committee determines the individual compensation components of the program within the competitive target value for an executive officer’s total direct compensation.
Base Salary
Base salary is the only fixed component of our executives’ total direct compensation that establishes a minimum level of cash compensation for our executive officers, including the NEOs. Adjustments to base salaries are generally made based on market data and individual performance.
The following table shows each NEO’s base salary as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:
2021
Base Salary(1)
2020
Base Salary
Douglas H. Shulman$1,000,000$800,000
Micah R. Conrad$450,000$450,000
Rajive Chadha$450,000$450,000
(1)
Base salary for Mr. Shulman increased effective as of July 16, 2021 to better align with market and Peer Group practices. The base salaries for Messrs. Conrad and Chadha were unchanged from 2020. Each NEO’s actual base salary earned during 2021 is reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table.
For 2022, the base salary for Mr. Shulman remains unchanged from his base salary as of December 31, 2021. Effective as of February 1, 2022, the base salaries for each of Messrs. Conrad and Chadha were increased to $500,000 in connection with our annual compensation assessment.
Annual Incentive Compensation
Our executive officers are eligible to receive annual incentive compensation contingent upon the attainment of specific, pre-established financial performance metrics and strategic objectives for the Company, which are intended to drive sustainable growth and create long-term stockholder value. Annual incentive compensation is paid in the form of cash and RSUs. Cash incentive and RSUs are each intended to reflect one-third of an executive officer’s total annual incentive compensation opportunity.
The Committee sets collective annual incentive compensation targets for the NEOs and a performance range with accompanying variability of compensation is determined for each metric. Pursuant to the terms of the annual incentive program, following the determination of performance at the end of the fiscal year, the annual incentive awards, to the extent earned, are paid in cash and RSUs. RSUs vest in three equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting at the time the Committee certifies that the applicable performance goals have been achieved and the second and third installments vesting one and two years later.
For 2021, annual incentive compensation comprised 80% financial performance metrics and 20% qualitative metrics. The financial performance metrics were selected to align compensation with our business strategy and performance and to reward achievement of financial targets and effective strategic leadership. Qualitative metrics were selected to align with the Company’s strategic objectives, including positioning for the future, continuing to optimize our core business, stabilizing our core business to accommodate growth, continuing to maintain and strengthen the balance sheet and driving our mission as a socially responsible company.
Based on the target performance metrics originally set for 2021, the overall achievement level for our weighted financial performance was 139.4%. However, the Committee determined that it was appropriate to apply negative discretion to our performance because our 2021 compensation targets had not contemplated a significant government stimulus in the first quarter of 2021, which drove net credit losses to a historic low and contributed to C&I Net Charge-Offs and C&I ROR performance that was superior to target levels. Due to the external nature of this event, the Committee reduced our performance on these metrics
40

to target levels, which resulted in an adjusted weighted financial performance of 120.6%. In determining its qualitative assessment of performance, the Committee evaluated the non-financial performance of the Company for 2021 and determined that a 110% achievement for the qualitative metrics appropriately reflected such performance. In combination with the adjusted weighted financial performance, this resulted in an overall payout ratio of 118.5% of target.
Our 2021 financial performance and resulting payout approved by the Committee, inclusive of the Committee’s application of negative discretion, are reflected in the table below.
2021 Incentive Performance Scorecard
Metric(1)
WeightTargetResult
Adjusted
Result(2)
Achievement
Level
C&I Capital Generation30%$1,080$1,303$1,303150%
C&I Net Charge-Offs15%$1,060$768$1,060100%
C&I Operating Expenses15%$1,325$1,341$1,34193.4%
C&I ROR15%12.9%14.6%13.0%100%
Customer Accounts (in thousands)5%2,3702,4512,451150%
Weighted Financial Performance80%100.0%139.4%120.6%120.6%
Qualitative Assessment20%110.0%
Incentive Payout Ratio118.5%
(1)
Refer to the Appendix for a description of these metrics, other than customer accounts, and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)
Reflects the Committee’s application of negative discretion to adjust C&I Net Charge-Offs and C&I ROR due to its determination that our results surpassed such targets partially due to positive external impacts. This had the effect of reducing the financial performance metrics to 120.6% rather than the 139.4% that would have been achieved had the Committee not applied negative discretion.
The table below reflects the target and earned annual incentive amounts based on the 118.5% payout ratio reflected in the preceding table, as well as the value of the cash and RSU components of the total earned annual incentive compensation.
2021 Annual Incentive Awards
Target
Annual Incentive
Compensation
Earned Cash
Component
Earned RSU
Component(1)
Earned
Annual Incentive
Compensation
Douglas H. Shulman$4,333,334$2,567,500$2,592,449$5,159,949
Micah R. Conrad$1,233,333$730,750$737,821$1,468,571
Rajive Chadha$1,166,667$691,250$697,939$1,389,189
(1)
RSUs were granted in January 2022 and, in accordance with SEC rules, will be reported as 2022 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in the Proxy Statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting. The price used to determine the number of RSUs granted was $51.43, which was the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the five days preceding the grant date of January 26, 2022. The value of the RSU component is computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), based on a closing grant date stock price of  $51.93 multiplied by the number of RSUs granted.
41

Long-Term Performance-Based Equity Awards
PSUs are intended to reflect one-third of an executive officer’s total target incentive compensation opportunity. PSUs for the 2021-2023 performance period will be earned upon the attainment of three-year cumulative performance goals tied to two Economic Earnings metrics:
2021 Performance Share Unit Targets
Metric*Weighting
Economic Earnings Average Growth67%
Economic Average Unlevered Return33%
*
Refer to the Appendix for a description of these metrics.
The Committee has discretion to adjust the metrics if net charge-offs exceed 7% in any calendar year during the performance period. These are the same metrics as used in prior year PSUs, which the Committee determined to continue using for the PSUs granted in 2021 based on a review of our compensation program and strategic priorities. PSUs have possible payouts ranging between 0% and 150% of the target level:
2021 PSU Target
Douglas H. Shulman$1,833,333
Micah R. Conrad$616,667
Rajive Chadha$583,333
2021 Incentive-Based Retention Awards
In July 2021 and September 2021, the Committee granted retention equity awards to Mr. Shulman and Messrs. Chadha and Conrad, respectively. The Committee determined such grants were necessary to retain and incentivize these executives to achieve continued stockholder value creation during an important growth period for the Company and at a time of significant uncertainty when our largest stockholder was in the process of transitioning out of the stock of the Company through the Consortium Transactions. In approving the terms of the awards, the Committee conducted a review of the Company’s performance under the executives’ leadership, including against its peers, during Mr. Shulman’s three years as CEO, considered the competition for talent in the industry and received input from our independent compensation consultant.
The Committee granted 200,000 shares to Mr. Shulman and 75,000 shares to each of Messrs. Chadha and Conrad, structured as follows:

50% in RSUs that will vest in equal annual increments over a four-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

50% in PSUs that may be earned based on achievement of specified TSR thresholds over a seven-year period, with a 10% annual reduction in the target number of PSUs that can be earned for each year that the applicable tranche is achieved following the fifth year of the performance period.
Total Stockholder Return
Performance Goal
Vesting % of Target
80%50%
100%100%
120%150%
42

The following table reflects the grant date fair values of the RSU and PSU components of the retention equity awards, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
RSUPSU Target
Douglas H. Shulman$5,934,000$4,000,667
Micah R. Conrad$2,111,250$1,410,250
Rajive Chadha$2,111,250$1,410,250
To avoid a potential windfall, these retention equity awards do not contain any retirement provisions. The PSUs would not vest upon termination outside of a change in control and the RSUs would vest upon termination only in limited scenarios outside of a change in control.
In addition, to further align Mr. Shulman’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders and to demonstrate commitment to the creation of stockholder value over the long-term, as the Company moves to its next phase of growth, Mr. Shulman agreed to purchase an aggregate value of  $1 million of the Company’s common stock.
Performance-Based Awards Earned in 2021
Payout of Performance-Based Awards Granted in Prior Years
2019-2021 PSU Payout
In January 2022 the Committee determined final payout levels for PSU awards granted in 2019 with a performance cycle ending at the end of 2021. For the three-year performance period, our Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth was 27.7% and our Economic Average Unlevered Return was 13.3%, in each case exceeding the maximum threshold established and resulting in a payout factor of 150% for the 2019-2021 performance cycle.
2019-2021 Performance-Based Cash Awards to Messrs. Conrad and Chadha
During 2019, we entered into a special, long-term incentive program to provide three-year performance-based cash awards to Messrs. Conrad and Chadha. The special program was motivated by a desire to provide additional incentives to continue to grow the Company following the completion of the Consortium Acquisition and the related changes to our Board, as well as additions to executive management, and was created following consultation with our independent compensation consultant. The special incentive awards consisted of a $1,000,000 target cash payment award established by the Committee with a performance period of 2019-2021. Performance of the goals was designed to be achievable, but require the coordinated, cross-functional focus and effort of Messrs. Conrad and Chadha. These cash awards were paid to each of Messrs. Conrad and Chadha in the first quarter of 2022 in the amount of  $1,000,000 each. These amounts are reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column to the Summary Compensation Table on page 49.
2018 and 2019 Performance Option Awards
During 2018 and 2019, the Committee granted cash-settled performance-based awards to our NEOs which were intended to provide additional incentives to significantly grow the Company following the completion of the Consortium Acquisition and the related changes to our Board and executive management, and were made following consultation with our independent compensation consultant. In July 2018, Mr. Shulman was granted performance options with respect to 650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (in three tranches of 300,000, 225,000 and 125,000 shares). Messrs. Conrad and Chadha were each granted performance-based awards in July 2019 with respect to 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (in three tranches of 90,000, 70,000 and 40,000 shares). We refer to these performance-based awards collectively as the “Performance Option Awards.”
43

The Performance Option Awards were subject to achievement of double-trigger vesting conditions based on: (x) a reduction in the portion of the Company’s common stock owned by the Consortium to specified levels and (y) the Company’s stock attaining (i) a specified volume-weighted trading price over a consecutive six-month period ending on or before the date the Consortium reduced its ownership below the applicable level or (ii) a fair market value on the date following the Consortium’s reduction in ownership below the applicable level that was not less than 10% below the applicable volume-weighted trading price trigger. In July 2021, the Performance Option Awards were amended to extend the minimum period to achieve the specified volume-weighted trading price of the Company’s common stock over a consecutive six-month period from the applicable Consortium sell-down date until July 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through the vesting date or an earlier qualifying termination of employment.
The Performance Option Awards were designed to closely align the interests of our management team with those of our stockholders. Accordingly, the payouts for Tranches I and II were designed to be triggered if the Consortium, and therefore our shareholders generally, received substantial pre-specified returns on investment based on the stock price at the time of the Consortium Acquisition. Because the holders of Performance Option Awards would only receive payouts if certain sustained trading price thresholds were exceeded and if the Consortium elected to reduce its ownership level below 25%, with respect to Tranche I, and 10%, with respect to Tranche II, the Committee believed the Performance Option Awards were important to incentivize management to drive long-term performance while aligning payout to the investment horizon of our largest stockholder group.
During 2021, the vesting conditions related to the first two of three tranches of the Performance Option Awards were satisfied, resulting in cash payouts to our NEOs reflecting the excess of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock over the applicable “base calculation price” of the Performance Option Awards, as reflected in the table below:
Performance Option Award Targets and Payouts
Tranche ITranche II
Douglas H. Shulman$10,393,500$7,023,375
Micah R. Conrad$3,379,050$2,388,050
Rajive Chadha$3,379,050$2,388,050
The vesting of the Performance Option Awards is reported in the 2021 Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table on page 54. The third tranche of the Performance Option Awards, representing approximately one-fifth of the Performance Option Awards, remains unvested with an adjusted trigger price as of December 31, 2021 of  $75.51, with respect to Mr. Shulman, and $76.01, with respect to Messrs. Conrad and Chadha, as reported in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End Table on page 53. This price, as adjusted for one-half of future dividends, must be achieved by July 2024 in order for vesting to occur.
3Employee Benefits and Other Compensation
We provide benefit programs that are designed to be competitive with market and provide reasonable security for employees. For 2021, welfare and retirement benefits were offered at essentially the same level to all U.S. salaried employees, including executive officers.
Retirement Benefits
All of our NEOs are eligible to participate in our general tax-qualified, defined contribution retirement savings 401(k) plan. We match a percentage of each participant’s contributions to the 401(k) plan up to the statutory limits.
Our NEOs are not eligible to participate in our tax qualified pension plan, which was frozen effective December 31, 2012. During 2021, we did not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which our NEOs are eligible/elect to participate.
44

In October 2021, the Committee adopted the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan”) which provides eligible participants, including our NEOs, with the option to defer receipt of some or all of their annual cash incentives and some of their base salaries, in each case, that are earned on or after January 1, 2022. The Committee determined to adopt such plan after reviewing our executive compensation plans in light of our goals and objectives, and deemed it to be in our and our stockholders’ best interests to provide certain employees with additional opportunities to defer compensation. Eligible participants include all employees with a base salary equal to or in excess of  $200,000, including each of our NEOs. Participant contributions will be fully vested at all times. Employer contributions are not permitted under the NQDC Plan. Distributions of participant accounts will be made following a participant’s separation of service, death, disability, unforeseeable emergency or as of a future payment date specified by the participant.
Welfare Benefits
Each of our executive officers is eligible to participate in our various group health and welfare benefit plans and fringe benefit programs that are generally available to all of our employees on a non-discriminatory basis.
Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements
For discussion of our severance and change-in-control arrangements, including a description of our Executive Severance Plan and the employment agreements with Messrs. Shulman and Chadha, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Tables — Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements” beginning on page 56.
Other Compensation
Other compensation for our executive officers consists primarily of dividend equivalents with respect to unvested and outstanding RSUs, PSUs and Performance Option Awards. Such awards are credited with dividend equivalents equal to the per share cash dividends paid on our common stock, multiplied by the total number of equity awards subject to the award that are outstanding on the record date for such dividend. Half of the dividend equivalents are paid at the time of the dividend and half accrue and are paid at the time of vesting. The crediting of dividend equivalents is meant to treat the equity award holders consistently with stockholders, which serves to further align the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders, with half of the amount deferred until vesting for retention purposes. Because they are not included in the grant date fair value of awards, dividend equivalents are reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
We generally limit perquisites for our executive officers, and when perquisites are provided they are limited to items that serve a reasonable business purpose.
4How We Make Compensation Decisions
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the development and administration of our executive compensation and employee benefit plans and practices. The Committee, which consists of three independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive officer compensation program.
The Committee is responsible for evaluating annually the performance of each of our NEOs and determining and approving their compensation (including, but not limited to, base pay and annual and long-term incentive award opportunities) based on such evaluation. Additionally, the Committee is responsible for the following, among its other duties:
45


Reviewing the Company’s executive compensation plans, including the goals and objectives relevant to compensation;

Evaluating the performance of our executive officers in light of such goals and objectives;

Reviewing and approving any severance or termination arrangements to be made with any executive officer;

Reviewing any perquisites or other personal benefits provided to any executive officer; and

Reviewing whether incentive and other forms of pay encourage excessive risk-taking and the relationship between risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and the Company’s compensation arrangements.
The role of the Committee is described in detail in the Compensation Committee Charter, which is available under the Corporate Governance tab in the Investor Relations section of our website at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com. The Committee is supported in its work by our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, her staff, and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as described below.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
The Committee recognizes the importance of using an independent compensation consultant that provides services to our Board and its committees. In 2021, the Committee retained FW Cook as its independent executive compensation consultant to provide independent advice, information and analysis on executive compensation, incentive plan performance measures and compensation program design and developments. FW Cook is engaged by and reports directly to the Committee, and the Committee may replace its compensation consultant or hire additional consultants at any time. A representative of FW Cook attends meetings of the Committee, when requested, and communicates with the Committee Chair between meetings.
Compensation Consultant Independence
The Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to the NYSE rules, and the Committee has concluded that the work performed by FW Cook for the Committee during 2021 did not raise any conflicts of interest that would prevent FW Cook from independently advising the Committee.
Role of Management
The Committee receives recommendations from the CEO, working with management, regarding our executive compensation structure, metrics and goals. Our CEO does not make any recommendations with respect to his own compensation.
The Committee also receives information from our Chief Risk Officer to evaluate whether our incentive compensation programs for our executive officers and other employees encourage responsible investment of our resources and do not unintentionally encourage or reward imprudent risk-taking. After a review of our compensation plans by our Chief Risk Officer, who briefed the Committee at its meeting in October 2021, the Committee concluded that our compensation plans were well defined and well documented. Additionally, our incentive compensation plans were not unbalanced such that they encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking that would endanger the reputation or financial well-being of the Company or otherwise have any material adverse effect on the Company.
Stockholder Feedback
At our 2020 Annual Meeting, our stockholders voted in favor of conducting advisory votes on our executive compensation program on a triennial basis. We also conducted an advisory vote on our executive compensation program at our 2020 Annual Meeting, at which approximately 87% of the votes cast were in
46

favor of our executive compensation program. Following the vote, the Board and the Committee discussed and considered the results and determined that the existing executive compensation program is in the Company and stockholders’ best interest at this time. The next such say-on-pay vote will take place at our 2023 Annual Meeting.
Peer Group
In the course of designing and implementing our executive compensation programs, the Committee uses compensation data compiled from a group of publicly traded peer companies in the diversified financial services industries (including banking, consumer finance, thrifts and mortgage finance), as well as the specialty retail and IT services industries. The Committee periodically reviews and updates the Peer Group, as necessary, upon the recommendation of its independent compensation consultant. We believe our Peer Group represents the industries with which we currently compete for executive talent, and also includes our principal business competitors.
Peer Group and Industry

The Aaron’s Company Inc.
(Specialty Retail)

Credit Acceptance Corporation
(Consumer Finance)

CIT Group Inc.(1)
(Banking)

Dollar Tree, Inc.
(Multiline Retail)

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
(Banking)

Navient Corporation
(Consumer Finance)

Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.
(Consumer Finance)

Synchrony Financial
(Consumer Finance)

Alliance Data Systems Corporation
(IT Services)

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(Banking)

Comerica Incorporated
(Banking)

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(IT Services)

LendingClub Corporation
(Consumer Finance)

Mr. Cooper Group Inc.
(Thrifts and Mortgage Finance)

SLM Corporation
(Consumer Finance)

The Western Union Company
(IT Services)
(1)   CIT Group Inc. was acquired by First Citizens BankShares Inc. on January 3, 2022.
The Committee relies on various sources of compensation information to determine the competitive market for our NEOs. To assess the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, we (together with our independent compensation consultant) analyze Peer Group compensation data obtained from peer company proxy materials as well as compensation and benefits survey data provided by other national compensation consulting firms. As part of this process, we measure our program’s competitiveness by comparing relevant market data against actual pay levels within each compensation component and in the aggregate for each executive officer position. We also review the mix of our compensation components with respect to fixed versus variable, short-term versus long-term, and cash versus equity-based pay. This information is then presented to the Committee for its review and use.
Accounting and Tax Treatment
The accounting and tax treatment of the elements of our executive compensation is one factor considered in the design of the program. Although the Committee may consider the impact of tax and accounting consequences when developing and implementing the Company’s executive compensation program, the
47

Committee retains the flexibility to design and administer a compensation program that is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Compensation Committee Report
The Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth herein with management. Based upon the Committee’s review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the terms of their respective employment agreements rather than pursuant toBoard that the terms of the Executive Severance Plan because their employment agreements provide a greater level of severance benefits under such circumstances. Severance payment amounts for Messrs. ParkerCompensation Discussion and HurzelerAnalysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the event of a termination without cause or for good reason following a change of control reflect amounts due to them pursuant to the terms of the2021 Annual Plan, the Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Executive Severance Plan rather than pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements because their employment agreements provide a lower level of severance benefits under such circumstances.

(3)The vesting of Mr. Shulman’s equity awards is based on the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. Shulman’s cash settled option award granted on July 12, 2018 is excluded from this table as the award currently holds no value as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. In the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason, all of the then unvested RSUs shall vest. For Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler and Borchers, the award agreements for RSUs and RSAs generally provide for the following treatment: (i) upon a termination without cause, vesting of the tranche of RSUs and RSAs scheduled to vest on the next applicable vesting date, and (ii) upon death or disability, accelerated vesting of all outstanding RSUs and RSAs. Mr. Hurzeler’s RSUs that vested in January 2019 and March 2019 and that are scheduled to vest in March 2020, and Mr. Parker’s serviced based RSUs that vested in March 2019 and that are scheduled to vest in March 2020, June 2019 and June 2020 do not provide for any termination protections beyond those provided under the terms of the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides for accelerated vesting of all outstanding RSUs and RSAs upon a termination without cause (but not for good reason) within 12-months subsequent to a change in control (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan). For Mr. Parker, 69,440 RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause ($1,686,698); 120,003 RSUs and 53,434 performance-based RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause or for good reason following a Change in Control, with the performance-based RSUs deemed to be fully achieved at maximum ($1,297,911); and 59,404 RSUs will vest upon death or disability ($1,442,923). For Mr. Hurzeler, 93,635 service-based RSAs and RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause ($2,274,394); 142,843 service-based RSAs and RSUs and 42,747 performance-based RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause following a Change in Control, with the performance-based RSUs deemed to be fully achieved at maximum ($1,038,325); and 59,871 RSUs and RSAs will vest upon death or disability ($1,454,267). For Mr. Borchers, 2,556 RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause ($62,085), 7,669 RSUs will vest upon a termination without cause following a Change in Control or upon death or disability ($186,280).Report.
(4)The amounts shown in this column for Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers represent payments of pro-rata bonus amounts under the Annual Plan for the year in which a change in control (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan) occurs, based on the greater of target or actual performance as of the date of the change in control. Messrs. Parker, Hurzeler, Anderson and Borchers were the only NEOs participating in the Annual Plan for 2018 and, therefore, were the only NEOs eligible for such payment. The amount shown assumes a change in control occurred for purposes of the Annual Plan on December 31, 2018. For 2018, actual performance for Messrs. Parker, and Hurzeler was above the target performance ($1,600,000); for Mr. Anderson was above the target performance ($450,000); and for Mr. Borchers was above the target performance ($650,000). For Mr. Parker, the amounts shown in this column also represent the value of 38,331 RSUs granted in March 2017 that will vest in full on the date of an “Acquisition” (defined as the date that a person acquires more than 50% of the Company’s voting securities).
(5)The employment agreement for Mr. Shulman does not provide for severance payments in the event of disability or death. Severance payments for Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler in the event of disability and death are based on the terms of their respective employment agreements. For Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler, the severance payments consist of a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination based on the average of the annual bonuses paid to them for the last three years prior to the year of termination (or such lesser number of years for which the executive received a non-zero annual bonus). The Executive Severance Plan does not provide for severance payments in the event of disability or death.

On March 13, 2015, we adopted the Executive Severance Plan, which became effective on March 16, 2015. As of December 31, 2018, the

Compensation Committee had identified Messrs. Borchers and Anderson as Eligible Executives for purposes of participating in the Executive Severance Plan. Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler are also eligible to participate in the Executive Severance Plan, subject to applicable offsets, as described below. The Executive Severance Plan provides for severance payments

47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and benefits to the “Eligible Executives” (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) in the event of a “Qualifying Termination” (as defined below). In the event of a Qualifying Termination and subject to the Eligible Executive’s adherence to the covenants contained in the Executive Severance Plan and execution of a severance agreement (including a general waiver and release of claims along with certain non-competition and intellectual property protections), the Executive Severance Plan provides for (i) continued payment of the Eligible Executive’s annual base salary for a period of 12-months and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to 12-months of premiums for COBRA continuation coverage for the Eligible Executive and his or her eligible dependents.

A Qualifying Termination is defined as a termination other than for “Cause” (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan); provided that, if there has been a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), a Qualifying Termination includes both a termination other than for Cause and resignation for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan) within 12-months after the Change in Control.

Messrs. Shulman, Parker and Hurzeler are eligible to receive the termination benefits as described in their respective employment agreements (see “—Employment Agreements” above for additional information concerning the terms of the employment agreements of Messrs. Shulman, Parker and Hurzeler). Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler are also eligible to participate in the Executive Severance Plan, provided that any severance amounts payable to Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler under the Executive Severance Plan will be reduced by the severance amounts payable to Messrs. Parker and Hurzeler under the terms of their employment agreements.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

For 2018, the median of the annual total compensation determined in accordance with SEC rules of all of our employees, excluding our principal executive officer, was $38,766. There has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would significantly affect the pay ratio. On that basis, for the purpose of identifying our median compensated employee and computing median annual total compensation, we utilized the same employee that we identified in 2017 as the median employee. In calculating the 2018 pay ratio, we used payroll and income tax records (Form W-2) as of December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the total compensation for our CEO, Mr. Shulman, was $5,750,706 as reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 on page 39. Since Mr. Shulman was appointed as President and CEO effective September 8, 2018, we annualized his Salary, Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation and All Other Compensation, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018, and added the disclosed values of his Stock Awards and other compensation components to arrive at an annualized value of $8,484,619 for purposes of this pay ratio disclosure. The resulting pay ratio is estimated to be approximately 219 to 1.

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We annualized Mr. Shulman’s total compensation as follows:

Pay Component
Actual Value
Disclosed in the
Summary
Compensation
Table
Amount as
Adjusted for
Purposes of CEO
Pay Ratio
Disclosure
Reason for Adjustment
Salary
$
215,385
 
$
800,000
 
Adjusted to annual base salary
Stock Awards
$
3,000,000
 
$
3,000,000
 
No adjustment as this is a one-time replacement equity award
Bonus Plus Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
$
2,511,306
 
$
4,660,334
 
Reflects full year target of $3,666,667 multiplied by the results from the 2018 executive scorecard (127.1%).
All Other Compensation
$
24,015
 
$
24,285
 
Adjusted to annualize the group term life portion of All Other Compensation.
Total Compensation
$
5,750,706
 
$
8,484,619
 
 

Investors are cautioned, that amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 above for our NEOs, including our principal executive officer, are determined pursuant to SEC rules that do not necessarily reflect amounts actually received or realized by, or value actually delivered to, our NEOs, including our principal executive officer. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance or emphasis on such amounts, or the ratio disclosed above.

Independent Director Compensation

We pay compensation to certain of our non-employee independent directors for their service as members of the Board and its Committees. Weof Directors

Roy A. Guthrie
Aneek S. Mamik
Richard A. Smith
48

5Executive Compensation Tables
2021 Summary Compensation Table
The table below summarizes information regarding compensation for the years 2019 through 2021, as applicable, for each of our NEOs.
Name and Principal
Position
Year
Salary
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
Changes in
Pension Value &
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
Douglas H. Shulman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer2021889,23114,005,1702,567,5004,253,16721,715,068
2020800,0004,221,3601,945,1662,773,1069,739,632
2019800,0004,361,6402,238,5001,018,1918,418,331
Micah R. Conrad,
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer
2021450,0004,890,6381,730,7501,128,8108,200,198
2020450,0001,419,862654,283785,2093,309,354
2019409,039616,654752,950470,8732,249,516
Rajive Chadha,
Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating
Officer
2021450,0004,816,6221,691,2501,174,1198,131,991
2020450,0001,343,113618,917754,8793,166,909
2019190,3841,240,950712,250372,2032,515,787
(1)
The amount in this column reflects the salary each NEO received as base salary in 2021.
(2)
This column reports the grant date fair value of each form of equity award granted to our NEOs in accordance with ASC 718.
For 2021, the amounts in this column include RSUs reflecting the equity component of our annual incentive program, annual PSU grants and a retention equity award of RSUs and PSUs with performance and service-based components. The 2021 amounts are reflected in the following table:
Name
Annual
RSU Grant(a)
$
Annual
PSU Grant(b)
$
Retention
RSU Grant(c)
$
Retention
PSU Grant(d)
$
Total 2021
Stock Awards
$
Douglas H. Shulman1,949,1602,121,3435,934,0004,000,66714,005,170
Micah R. Conrad655,594713,5442,111,2501,410,2504,890,638
Rajive Chadha620,157674,9652,111,2501,410,2504,816,622
(a)
The RSUs granted in partial payment of the annual incentive awards vest in three equal increments following the grant date based on continued service, with one-third having vested on February 19, 2021, one-third having vested on February 19, 2022 and one-third vesting in February 2023.
(b)
The reported grant date fair value of the PSUs reported in this column and included in the Summary Compensation Table is based on target payouts of such awards. If the maximum level of performance had been assumed, the grant date fair value of such PSUs would have been $3,182,015 for Mr. Shulman, $1,070,316 for Mr. Conrad and $1,012,448 for Mr. Chadha. The PSUs vest after three years based upon the attainment of performance goals established by the Committee for the 2021-2023 performance period.
(c)
The retention RSUs will vest in equal annual increments over a four-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.
(d)
The retention PSUs will vest based on performance over a seven-year period. The grant date fair value of the retention PSUs reported in this column and included in the Summary Compensation Table is based on target payouts of such awards. If the maximum level of performance had been assumed, the grant date fair value of such awards would have been $6,001,001 for Mr. Shulman and $2,115,375 for each of Messrs. Conrad and Chadha. The PSUs in the retention grant will vest based on the Company’s TSR over a seven-year period, with 50% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 80%, 100% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 100% and 150% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 120%, with the payout being reduced by 10% for each year the tranche is achieved following year five of the seven-year performance period.
49

The amounts in this column with respect to 2020 include RSUs reflecting the equity component of our 2019 annual incentive program paid out in January 2020 and annual PSUs granted in 2020. The grant date fair value of the RSUs was $2,320,718 for Mr. Shulman, $780,566 for Mr. Conrad and $738,395 for Mr. Chadha. The grant date fair value of the annual PSUs was $1,900,642 for Mr. Shulman, $639,296 for Mr. Conrad and $604,718 for Mr. Chadha.
The amounts in this column with respect to 2019 include RSUs reflecting the equity component of our 2018 annual incentive program paid out in January 2019 and annual PSUs granted in 2019. The grant date fair value of the RSUs was $1,255,650 for Mr. Shulman, $0 for Mr. Conrad and $657,642 for Mr. Chadha. The grant date fair value of the annual PSUs was $3,105,990 for Mr. Shulman, $616,654 for Mr. Conrad and $583,308 for Mr. Chadha.
For a summary of the assumptions used in the valuation of these equity-based awards, please see Note 16, Share Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2021 Annual Report.
(3)
The amounts in this column reflect (i) the annual cash awards paid with respect to performance for the applicable year under the annual incentive program and (ii) for 2021 only, payment to each of Messrs. Conrad and Chadha of the 2019-2021 performance-based cash awards in the amount of  $1,000,000 each.
(4)
The amounts shown in this column include the following for 2021:
Name401(k)
Match
$
Dividend
Equivalents(a)
$
Other
Compensation(b)
$
Total All Other
Compensation
$
Douglas H. Shulman11,6004,240,0151,5524,253,167
Micah R. Conrad11,6001,115,6581,5521,128,810
Rajive Chadha11,6001,160,4872,0321,174,119
(a)
The values in this column represent dividend equivalent payments during 2021 in respect of RSUs, PSUs and Performance Option Awards held by our NEOs. These amounts are reported in this column because they are not included in the grant date fair value of awards.
(b)
The values in this column represent employer-paid health spending account contributions and fringe benefit imputed income pursuant to group health and welfare benefit programs that are available generally to all employees.
50

2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The table below summarizes information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during 2021.
NameGrant
Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Douglas H. Shulman1/28/2021(2)916,6671,833,3332,750,000
1/28/2021(3)40,3721,949,160
2/9/2021(4)19,02638,05176,1022,121,343
7/16/2021(5)100,0005,934,000
7/16/2021(6)50,000100,000150,0004,000,667
7/16/2021(7)166,667333,333500,000���
Micah R. Conrad1/28/2021(2)308,334616,667925,001
1/28/2021(3)13,579655,594
2/9/2021(4)6,40012,79925,598713,544
9/7/2021(5)37,5002,111,250
9/7/2021(6)18,75037,50056,2501,410,250
Rajive Chadha1/28/2021(2)291,667583,333875,000
1/28/2021(3)12,845620,157
2/9/2021(4)6,05412,10724,214674,965
9/7/2021(5)37,5002,111,250
9/7/2021(6)18,75037,50056,2501,410,250
(1)
Amounts reported in this column are calculated in accordance with ASC 718 based on the probable achievement of the underlying performance conditions. For a summary of the assumptions used in the valuation of these equity-based awards, please see Note 16, Share Based Compensation, to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2021 Annual Report.
(2)
Represents 2021 cash awards under the annual incentive program. The amounts reported represent the threshold, target and maximum awards (50%, 100% and 150% of target, respectively) that could be earned based on achievement of quantitative and qualitative goals as determined by the Committee. Based on the actual achievement for 2021 under the terms of the annual incentive program, the Committee approved cash payouts in early 2022 at 118.5% of target, as reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2021 above.
(3)
Represents RSUs granted under the 2020 annual incentive program. The amount reported in this table represents the RSUs that were granted in 2021 following the determination of 2020 performance. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments, with one-third having vested on February 19, 2021, one-third having vested on February 19, 2022 and one-third vesting in February 2023.
(4)
Represents annual PSUs granted in 2021. The PSU awards will fully vest in the first quarter of 2024, to the extent earned, based upon actual achievement of quantitative goals as determined by the Committee and as further described in the CD&A.
(5)
Represents the time-based RSU component of retention equity awards granted on July 16, 2021 to Mr. Shulman and on September 7, 2021 to Messrs. Conrad and Chadha. These grants will vest in equal annual increments over a four-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.
(6)
Represents the PSU component of retention equity awards granted on July 16, 2021 to Mr. Shulman and on September 7, 2021 to Messrs. Conrad and Chadha. These grants will vest based on the Company’s TSR over a seven-year period, with 50% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 80%, 100% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 100% and 150% of the PSUs vesting at a TSR of 120%, with the payout being reduced by 10% for each year the tranche is achieved following year five of the seven-year performance period.
(7)
Represents an incremental increase in the 2021 cash award for Mr. Shulman under the annual incentive program in connection with his salary increase in July 2021 as further described in the CD&A. The amounts reported represent
51

the threshold, target and maximum awards (50%, 100% and 150% of target, respectively) that could be earned based on achievement of quantitative and qualitative goals as determined by the Committee. Based on the actual achievement for 2021 under the terms of the annual incentive program, the Committee approved cash payouts in early 2022 at 118.5% of target, as reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2021 above.
The 2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table reports the dollar value of cash (non-equity) incentive awards and the number and value of equity awards granted to each executive officer during 2021. With regard to cash incentives, this table reports the range of potential values that could have been obtained by the executive officer; whereas the Summary Compensation Table reports the actual value realized for 2021. Equity amounts represent the grant date values of the awards determined under ASC 718 for purposes of financial statement reporting, which are based on probable outcomes. Grant date fair values reflected in the 2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table do not include dividend equivalent payments with respect to the underlying equity-based awards.
52

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table summarizes the equity awards held by our NEOs that were unvested and outstanding as of December 31, 2021.
Option AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unearned
Options
(#)(1)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)(1)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(2)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
NameExercisable
(#)
Unexercisable
(#)
Douglas H. Shulman125,00023.917/16/2024144,947(3)7,253,148337,655(6)16,896,256
Micah R. Conrad40,00021.017/26/202452,618(4)2,633,00592,584(7)4,632,903
Rajive Chadha40,00021.017/26/202460,646(5)3,034,72688,021(8)4,404,571
(1)
The Performance Option Awards held by the NEOs are in three tranches. The first two tranches settled during 2021, as reflected below in the 2021 Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table, and the third tranche remains unvested as reflected in this column. The unvested tranche is subject to a vesting condition relating to the Company achieving a specified volume-weighted average trading price (“VWAP”) over a consecutive six-month period by July 2024. As of December 31, 2021, the VWAP goal for Tranche III was $75.51 for Mr. Shulman and $76.01 for Messrs. Conrad and Chadha, in each case subject to further adjustment (as described below). The awards include reductions to the VWAP and the base calculation price of unvested awards as follows: an amount equal to 50% of any cash dividends is applied to reduce the VWAP and the base calculation price; the remaining 50% of any cash dividends is paid to the award holder as soon as practicable following the date such cash dividend is paid to holders of shares of common stock, provided that the award holder remains employed. If the award holder is no longer employed, an amount equal to 100% of any cash dividend is applied to reduce the VWAP and the base calculation price.
(2)
Based on the closing market price of Company common stock on December 31, 2021 of  $50.04 per share.
(3)
Represents RSUs granted to Mr. Shulman in 2020 and 2021 that were unvested as of December 31, 2021. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 31,489 vested in February 2022, 25,000 are scheduled to vest in July 2022, 13,458 are scheduled to vest in February 2023, 25,000 are scheduled to vest in July 2023, 25,000 are scheduled to vest in July 2024 and 25,000 are scheduled to vest in July 2025.
(4)
Represents RSUs granted to Mr. Conrad in 2020 and 2021 that were unvested as of December 31, 2021. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 10,591 vested in February 2022, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2022, 4,527 are scheduled to vest in February 2023, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2023, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2024 and 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2025.
(5)
Represents RSUs granted to Mr. Chadha in 2020 and 2021 that were unvested as of December 31, 2021. The vesting schedule for the RSUs is as follows: 10,020 vested in February 2022, 8,844 vested in April 2022, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2022, 4,282 are scheduled to vest in February 20, 2023, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2023, 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2024 and 9,375 are scheduled to vest in September 2025.
(6)
Represents PSUs granted to Mr. Shulman in 2019, 2020 and 2021, in each case assuming performance is achieved at maximum performance levels. The vesting schedule for the PSU awards is as follows: 155,300 annual PSUs vested in the first quarter of 2022, 44,304 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2023, 38,051 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2024 and 100,000 retention PSUs will vest no later than July 2028, in each case based upon actual achievement of the quantitative goals as determined by the Committee. The PSUs that were granted in 2019 and vested in the first quarter of 2022 included PSUs granted with respect to Mr. Shulman’s 2018 service pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as described on page 57.
(7)
Represents PSUs granted to Mr. Conrad in 2019, 2020 and 2021, in each case assuming performance is achieved at maximum performance levels. The vesting schedule for the PSU awards is as follows: 27,383 annual PSUs vested in the first quarter of 2022, 14,902 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2023, 12,799 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2024 and 37,500 retention PSUs will vest no later than September 2028, in each case based upon actual achievement of the quantitative goals as determined by the Committee.
53

(8)
Represents PSUs granted to Mr. Chadha in 2019, 2020 and 2021, in each case assuming performance is achieved at maximum performance levels. The vesting schedule for the PSU awards is as follows: 24,318 annual PSUs vested in the first quarter of 2022, 14,096 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2023, 12,107 annual PSUs will vest in the first quarter of 2024 and 37,500 retention PSUs will vest no later than September 2028, in each case based upon actual achievement of the quantitative goals as determined by the Committee.
2021 Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table
Option Awards(1)
Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
Douglas H. Shulman(2)
525,00017,416,87545,4412,225,700
Micah R. Conrad(3)
160,0005,767,10012,758624,887
Rajive Chadha(4)
160,0005,767,10017,831908,521
(1)
The Performance Option Awards were granted to the NEOs in three tranches (300,000, 225,000 and 125,000 for Mr. Shulman; and 90,000, 70,000 and 40,000 for Messrs. Conrad and Chadha). The first two tranches settled during 2021, as shown in the table above and were paid in cash pursuant to their terms.
(2)
Represents RSUs that vested on February 19, 2021 with a value of  $48.98 per share on the vesting date.
(3)
Represents RSUs that vested on February 19, 2021 with a value of  $48.98 per share on the vesting date.
(4)
Includes 10,018 RSUs that vested on February 19, 2021, with a value of  $48.98 per share on the vesting date, and 7,813 RSUs that vested on April 20, 2021, with a value of  $53.48 per share on the vesting date.
54

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control for 2021
The following table shows the payments and benefits that our NEOs would have been eligible to receive if their employment had been terminated or if a change in control of the Company had occurred as of December 31, 2021. Amounts used for equity awards are based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2021 of  $50.04 per share.
NameType of Payment
or Benefit
Voluntary
Resignation
without
Good
Reason or
Retirement
($)
Termination
Due to
Disability or
Death
($)
Termination
without
Cause
($)
Termination
for Good
Reason
($)
Change
in
Control
($)(1)
Termination without
Cause or for Good
Reason following a
Change in Control
($)
Douglas H. Shulman(2)
Cash Severance Payment12,875,70012,875,70012,875,700
Acceleration of Unvested RSUs7,253,1482,826,7107,253,148
Acceleration of Unvested PSUs16,896,256
Continuation of
Benefits Payment
24,88524,88524,885
Total7,253,14815,727,29512,900,58537,049,989
Micah R. Conrad(3)(4)
Cash Severance Payment450,000450,000
Acceleration of Unvested RSUs2,633,005999,0992,633,005
Acceleration of Unvested PSUs4,632,903
Continuation of
Benefits Payment
24,04424,04424,044
Total2,633,0051,473,14324,0447,739,952
Rajive Chadha(3)(5)
Cash Severance Payment450,000450,000
Acceleration of Unvested RSUs3,034,7261,413,0803,034,726
Acceleration of Unvested PSUs4,404,571
Continuation of
Benefits Payment
17,13517,13517,135
Total3,034,7261,880,21517,1357,906,432
(1)
None of the NEOs is eligible to receive benefits solely in the event of a change in control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Omnibus Incentive Plan and certain of the NEOs’ award agreements contemplate acceleration of vesting of equity awards if such awards are not assumed and/or substituted upon a change in control.
(2)
Under Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement, in the event of a termination by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason (whether or not in connection with a change in control), he will receive a cash severance payment of an aggregate amount equal to (i) $2,633,333 payable over 24 months (or, if such termination occurs within the 24-month period following a change in control, a single lump sum), plus (ii) any earned but unpaid annual and long-term incentive for the calendar year immediately preceding the termination, plus (iii) an amount equal to two-thirds of the average annual and long-term incentive earned in respect of the three years completed prior to the year of termination. Under the terms of Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement, he is also entitled to a lump sum distribution equal to 12 months of premiums for COBRA continuation for Mr. Shulman and his dependents, representing $24,885.
Mr. Shulman’s RSU award agreements provide that (a) upon a termination without cause, the RSUs next scheduled to vest will vest, representing a total of 56,489 RSUs, or $2,826,710, and (b) upon a termination without cause (or, for the RSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or upon his death or disability, all unvested RSUs will vest, representing 144,947 RSUs, or $7,253,148.
55

Mr. Shulman’s PSU award agreements, including his annual PSUs and retention PSUs, provide that a total of 337,655 PSUs will vest upon a termination without cause (or, for the PSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or $16,896,256, and do not otherwise vest upon termination.
(3)
As of December 31, 2021, Messrs. Conrad and Chadha were eligible to receive severance benefits pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan. Under the Executive Severance Plan, upon a termination by the Company without cause (whether or not in connection with a change in control) or by the executive for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, each executive receives base salary continuation for 12 months and a lump sum distribution equal to 12 months of premiums for COBRA continuation for the executive and his dependents at the rates in effect on the date of termination. Messrs. Conrad and Chadha are eligible to receive lump-sum COBRA premiums pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Plan in the amounts of  $24,044 and $17,135, respectively.
(4)
Mr. Conrad’s RSU award agreements provide that (a) upon a termination without cause, the RSUs next scheduled to vest will vest, representing a total of 19,966 RSUs, or $999,099, and (b) upon a termination without cause (or, for the RSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or upon his death or disability, all unvested RSUs will vest, representing 52,618 RSUs, or $2,633,005.
Mr. Conrad’s PSU award agreements, including his annual PSUs and retention PSUs, provide that a total of 92,584 PSUs will vest upon a termination without cause (or, for the PSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or $4,632,903, and do not otherwise vest upon termination.
(5)
Mr. Chadha’s RSU award agreements provide that (a) upon a termination without cause, the RSUs next scheduled to vest will vest, representing a total of 28,239 RSUs, or $1,413,080, and (b) upon a termination without cause (or, for the RSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or upon his death or disability, all unvested RSUs will vest, representing 60,646 RSUs, or $3,034,726.
Mr. Chadha’s PSU award agreements, including his annual PSUs and retention PSUs, provide that a total of 88,021 PSUs will vest upon a termination without cause (or, for the PSUs granted in 2021, resignation for good reason) during the 12 months following a change in control, or $4,404,571, and do not otherwise vest upon termination.
Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements
Executive Severance Plan
Our Executive Severance Plan is intended to facilitate changes in the leadership team by establishing terms for the separation of an executive officer in advance, allowing for a smooth transition of responsibilities when it is in the best interests of the Company. As of December 31, 2021, the Committee had identified Messrs. Chadha and Conrad as “eligible executives,” as defined in the Executive Severance Plan for purposes of participation in such plan. The Executive Severance Plan provides for severance payments and benefits to the eligible executives in the event of a “qualifying termination.” A qualifying termination is defined as (i) a termination by the Company without “cause” or (ii) a termination by the executive for “good reason” on or before the 12-month anniversary of a “change in control” ​(each term, as defined in the Executive Severance Plan). In the event of a qualifying termination and subject to the eligible executive’s adherence to the covenants contained in the Executive Severance Plan and execution of a severance agreement (including a general waiver and release of claims along with certain non-competition and intellectual property protections), the Executive Severance Plan provides for (i) continued payment of the eligible executive’s annual base salary for a period of 12 months and (ii) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to 12 months of premiums for COBRA continuation coverage for the eligible executive and their eligible dependents.
Omnibus Incentive Plan
In January 2021, we amended our Omnibus Incentive Plan to provide that, unless otherwise determined by the plan administrator, if a change in control occurs (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan), and the employment of the holder of an award granted under the plan (an “Award”) is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan) on or after the effective date of the change in control but prior to 12 months following the change in control, then: (i) any unvested portion of any Award carrying a right to exercise shall become fully vested and exercisable; and (ii) the restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions, and forfeiture conditions applicable to an Award granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan shall lapse and such Award shall be deemed fully vested and any performance goals imposed with respect to such Awards shall be deemed to be fully achieved. The change in control
56

protection provided by the Omnibus Incentive Plan does not apply to the voluntary termination of employment by an Award recipient following a change in control for “good reason” or otherwise.
Mr. Shulman’s Employment Agreement
In July 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Shulman pursuant to which he began serving as our CEO on September 8, 2018, and which reflected advice from our independent compensation consultant and consideration of the terms of Mr. Shulman’s compensation arrangements with his prior employer.
Pursuant to our employment agreement with Mr. Shulman, and an adjustment to base salary and incentive opportunity approved by the Committee in July 2021, Mr. Shulman receives an annual base salary of $1,000,000 and is eligible for an annual target incentive of  $6,500,000, payable in cash, RSUs and PSUs, subject to achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. The employment agreement also provided that the PSUs to be granted to Mr. Shulman pursuant to our annual equity grant determination for 2019 would include a prorated grant made with respect to his 2018 service.
Mr. Shulman is eligible to receive the termination benefits pursuant to his employment agreement. If Mr. Shulman’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for “cause” ​(as defined in the agreement, but not including a termination of employment due to death or disability) or he resigns for “good reason” ​(as defined in the agreement and summarized below), and if Mr. Shulman executes a general release of claims in a form acceptable to the Company and continues to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, then he would be entitled to: (i) a severance payment equal to $2,633,333, payable in equal installments over a 24-month period in accordance with the Company’s payroll (or, if such termination occurs within the 24-month period following a “change in control” ​(as defined in the agreement), a single lump sum); (ii) any earned but unpaid annual and long-term incentive for the calendar year immediately preceding the termination; (iii) an amount equal to two-thirds of the average annual and long-term incentive earned in respect of the three years completed prior to the year of termination; and (iv) a lump sum payment equal to 12 months of COBRA premiums.
For purposes of Mr. Shulman’s employment agreement, “good reason” means (i) a material reduction in his duties, authorities, responsibilities or reporting relationships; (ii) the reduction of his base salary or annual and long-term incentive opportunity (in each case, other than an across-the-board reduction affecting all senior management of the Company which reduction results in the decrease of his base salary or annual and long-term incentive opportunity, as applicable, of less than 10%); (iii) relocation of his principal location of employment by more than 50 miles (unless such new location is closer to his primary residence in New York City); (iv) the failure to nominate him as a member of the board of directors of the Company; or (v) the failure to pay him compensation when due under the terms of his employment agreement.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, as amended in July 2021, Mr. Shulman is bound by certain restrictive covenants including confidentiality, non-disparagement, work product and, during the term of his employment and for a period of one year thereafter, non-solicitation of employees, consultants and customers and non-competition. The Company is bound by a non-disparagement covenant.
Mr. Chadha’s Employment Agreement
In connection with Mr. Chadha’s appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, the Company entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Chadha setting forth the terms of his employment and compensation. The terms of the offer letter agreement reflect consideration of the terms of Mr. Chadha’s compensation arrangements with his prior employer and the results of negotiations between the parties to the agreement.
The letter agreement provides for an annual base salary of  $450,000 and eligibility for a 2019 annual target incentive of  $1,750,000, with one-third payable in cash, one-third granted in RSUs (in each case, subject to the achievement of performance goals established by the Committee relating to the 2019 performance
57

period), and the remaining one-third granted in PSUs, with vesting based on performance over the 2019-2021 performance period. In addition to the annual incentive award, Mr. Chadha was granted a three-year performance-based cash award and Performance Option Awards, subject to vesting conditions described in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Fiscal 2021 Compensation Elements — Performance-Based Awards Earned in 2021.” In addition, Mr. Chadha received certain relocation benefits, including reimbursed commuting expenses, home sale assistance and home purchase assistance.
6CEO Pay Ratio
In accordance with SEC rules, we have calculated the ratio between the total compensation of our CEO and our median employee for 2021. To select our median employee we evaluated our employee population and determined our median employee using W-2 income as our consistently applied compensation measure. We included our entire employee population as of December 31, 2020, annualized base pay for employees who were hired in 2020, and converted compensation for employees paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar into U.S. dollars using a fiscal year 2020 exchange rate. We did not make any full-time equivalent adjustment for any employee when annualizing base pay. We examined a small group of employees for whom total cash compensation was clustered within a few dollars around the median. From this group, we selected an individual we determined to be reasonably representative of our median employee. The 2020 median employee has since left the Company and, as permitted by applicable SEC rules, we have substituted another employee whose 2020 compensation was substantially similar to the original median employee. We do not believe that there have been any changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would significantly impact our CEO pay ratio disclosure.
The 2021 annual total compensation for the median employee, who serves as a personal loan specialist, determined in accordance with SEC rules was $52,697. The 2021 annual total compensation for our CEO, Mr. Shulman, was $21,715,068, as reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The resulting pay ratio is estimated to be approximately 412 to 1.
Amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our NEOs, including our CEO, are determined pursuant to SEC rules that do not necessarily reflect amounts actually received or realized by, or value actually delivered to, our NEOs, including our CEO. In addition, other companies have different employee demographics and compensation and benefit practices. As a result, CEO pay ratios reported by other companies may vary significantly and likely are not comparable to our CEO pay ratio.
58

Audit Committee Matters
Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2022. The Board is asking stockholders to ratify the appointment. Although SEC regulations and the NYSE listing requirements require the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to be engaged, retained and supervised by the Audit Committee, the Board considers the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm to be an important corporate governance matter for stockholders to provide input to the Audit Committee and the Board. If the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not ratified, the matter of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm will be re-considered by the Audit Committee. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be available at the Annual Meeting by phone and will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They also will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions regarding the Company’s financial statements.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-icon_circlepn.jpg]
The Board recommends a separate compensation arrangement with our Chairmanvote “FOR” the ratification of the Board described under the caption “Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program in Detail – Letter Agreement with Mr. Levine.” Fees to independent directors may be paid in cash or, in lieuappointment of cash, by issuances of Company common stock based on the value of Company common stock at the date of grant, provided that any such issuance does not prevent a director from being independent and the shares are granted pursuant to a stockholder approved plan. We also make annual grants of RSUs on the first day of each calendar year that vest one-year after the grant date, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date. For 2018, Board members were eligible to receive an annual retainer of $75,000 and a grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $110,000. Committee chairs are eligible to receive annual cash retainers of $30,000 (Audit and Compliance), $20,000 (NCG), and $25,000 (Compensation and Risk). Committee members also were eligible to receive annual cash retainers of $15,000 (Audit and Compliance) and $10,000 (NGC, Compensation and Risk). Our presiding non-management director receives an annual retainer of $25,000. Cash retainers for annual Board, presiding non-management director, committee chair and committee member service are paid in quarterly installments. Stock grants are reviewed and approved annually. Under the terms of the Omnibus Incentive Plan adopted by our Board and approved by our stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, no participant who is an independent director may receive cash and equity-based awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan valued at more than $500,000 during any calendar year. The Committee believes that these restrictions represent meaningful limits on the compensation payable to our independent directors. All members of the Board are also reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings or other Company business. Additionally, due to an administrative error by the Company in failing to provide timely and accurate tax information forms toPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent directors for tax years 2014 and 2015, the Company has agreed to reimburse our independent directors for tax preparation and filing fees

49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

incurred in connection with amending their 2014 and 2015 tax returns, as well as any tax penalties and interest on underpayment of taxes associated therewith.

Director Stock Ownership Policy

On March 25, 2016, the Board approved a Director Stock Ownership Policy to align the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders by encouraging significant stock ownership in the Company by our non-employee directors. Such policy is administered by the Committee. Pursuant to such policy, each non-employee director must at all times hold shares of Company common stock with a value equal to three times the cash retainer for such director’s annual Board service, excluding retainer fees for Board committee chair or committee member service. For purposes of determining compliance with such policy at any time, the value of the non-employee director’s holdings shall be determined by multiplying the number of shares held by such non-employee director by the average closing price of a share of Company common stockregistered public accounting firm for the previous calendar year. A non-employee director’s holdings include shares held directly by the non-employee director, including unvested restricted shares, and shares owned indirectly or beneficially by the non-employee director. Non-employee directors serving on March 25, 2016 are required to meet the requirements of such policy by March 25, 2021. Individuals who become a non-employee director after March 25, 2016 will have five years from the date such individual commenced service on the Board to satisfy the requirements of such policy.

Director Deferral Election Program

Each of our non-employee independent directors may elect to defer the delivery of all or a portion of their annual RSU grant for board service. Delivery of such RSUs may be delayed until the date of the director’s separation from board service, a specified date selected by the director or the earlier to occur of the director’s separation from board service and a specified date selected by the director. RSUs that have been deferred may be delivered, at the election of the director, in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period of time not to exceed five years. Any deferral election must be made in the year prior to the year of grant and is irrevocable followingending December 31,st of such prior year. The following directors made elections in 2017 to participate in the Director Deferral Election Program for 2018: Roy A. Guthrie and former director Douglas L. Jacobs.

2022.
Audit Committee Policies and Procedures
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services, including the fees and terms thereof, to be performed for us and our subsidiaries by our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy and implemented procedures that provide that all engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm are reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, except for such services that fall within the de minimis exception for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that our Audit Committee approves prior to the completion of the audit. The pre-approval policy also permits the delegation of pre-approval authority to a member of the Audit Committee between meetings of the committee, and any such approvals are reviewed and ratified by the committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the committee the authority to pre-approve permissible non-audit services.
Independent Auditor Tenure and Rotation
As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent audit firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been our independent auditor since 2002. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP rotates its lead audit engagement partner every five years and the Audit Committee interviews proposed candidates and selects the lead audit engagement partner. The Audit Committee believes there are significant benefits to having an independent auditor with an extensive history with the Company.
59

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, professional services were performed for us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, pursuant to the oversight of our Audit Committee. Set forth below are the fees billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. All fees and services were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy.
20212020
Audit Fees$11,591,000$10,188,000
Audit-Related Fees$1,434,000$871,000
Tax Fees$40,000$500,000
All Other Fees$8,000$9,000
Total Fees$13,073,000$11,568,000
Audit Fees. Audit fees primarily related to the annual audits of the combined consolidated financial statements of the Company and OMFC included in the 2021 Annual Report, the annual audit of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the reviews of the combined condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and OMFC included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and statutory audits of our insurance subsidiaries.
Audit-Related Fees. For 2021 and 2020, audit related fees primarily related to comfort letters issued to underwriters for debt and security offerings, implementation of accounting standards updates and certain other agreed-upon procedures.
Tax Fees. For 2021 and 2020 tax fees related to the computation of certain tax credits.
All Other Fees. For 2021 and 2020, all other fees related to services for our insurance subsidiaries.

50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Compensation Table for 2018

The total 2018 compensation of our non-employee directors is shown in the following table. We do not separately compensate our non-independent director, Mr. Shulman, for his Board or committee service.

Name
Service
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
Total
($)
Anahaita Kotval(4)
Board Meetings
 
51,678
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
66,695
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
118,373
 
 
258,585
 
 
55
 
 
377,013
 
Doug Jacobs(5)
Board Meetings
 
37,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
22,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
60,000
 
 
251,221
 
 
1,481
 
 
312,702
 
Roy Guthrie
Board Meetings
 
100,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
102,292
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
202,292
 
 
110,000
 
 
4,968
 
 
317,260
 
Ronnie Lott(5)
Board Meetings
 
37,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
50,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
87,500
 
 
251,221
 
 
1,100
 
 
339,821
 
Jay Levine
Board Meetings
 
78,253
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
78,253
 
 
78,082
 
 
7,292
 
 
163,627
 
Richard Smith
Board Meetings
 
38,733
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
18,075
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
56,808
 
 
72,930
 
 
258
 
 
129,996
 
Valerie Soranno Keating
Board Meetings
 
38,733
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committee
 
9,880
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
48,613
 
 
73,480
 
 
237
 
 
122,330
 
(1)Messrs. Jacobs, Guthrie and Lott and Ms. Kotval held 4,232 unvested RSUs that were granted on January 1, 2018 with a grant date fair value of $110,000; Mr. Smith and Ms. Soranno Keating held 2,202 unvested RSUs that were granted on June 25, 2018, with a grant date fair value of approximately $73,000. These RSUs vested on January 2, 2019. Mr. Levine’s award was granted pursuant to his letter agreement (defined below) and was prorated for the period September 8, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The RSUs subject to the award to Mr. Levine became 100% vested on January 2, 2019.
(2)The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2018, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. On May 21, 2018, the Board agreed to allow the outstanding RSUs held by directors who resigned in 2018 to continue to vest as scheduled on January 1, 2019. Accordingly, in the case of Ms. Kotval and Messrs. Jacobs and Lott, the amounts recorded in this column also include the incremental fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 associated with the modification of their outstanding equity awards in connection with their resignations from the Board.
(3)Represents reimbursements for expenses incurred in connection with the directors’ duties as independent directors.
(4)Ms. Kotval resigned from the Board effective September 8, 2018.
(5)Messrs. Jacobs and Lott resigned from the Board effective June 25, 2018 in connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction.

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Letter Agreement with our Chairman of the Board

In connection with Mr. Levine’s resignation as our President and Chief Executive Officer Mr. Levine and the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “letter agreement”), effective as of September 8, 2018, which provides for Mr. Levine to receive $500,000 per year in annual compensation, in lieu of any retainer fees or other consideration paid to directors generally, for his services as non-executive Chairman of the Board (including service on any Board committee or any other service), half of which shall be payable in cash (the “Annual Cash Director Fee”) and half of which shall be payable in the form of an equity award under the terms of the Omnibus Incentive Plan or another long-term incentive plan maintained by the Company (the “Annual Equity Director Fee” and, together with the Annual Cash Director Fee, the “Annual Director Fee”), subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as are applicable to the annual equity awards granted to other members of the Board. Pursuant to the letter agreement, the Annual Director Fee for 2018 was prorated using September 8, 2018 as the starting date, and the Committee approved a grant to Mr. Levine of RSUs with an aggregate value equal to $78,082 (which represents a proration of the Annual Equity Director Fee for 2018), which vested on January 2, 2019. Mr. Levine is bound by certain restrictive covenants under the letter agreement, including non-competition and non-solicitation of Company employees, consultants, independent contractors and other service providers, during the term of his service to the Company and Board and for a period of 12-months thereafter.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The current members of the Committee are the individuals named as signatories to the Compensation Committee Report set forth above under “Compensation Committee Report.” None of our executive officers currently serves as a member of the board of directors or as a member of a compensation committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of the Board or the Committee. None of the individuals who served on the Committee during 2018 and none of the current members of the Committee are current or former officers or employees of the Company. Additionally, none of the individuals who currently serve as members of the Committee or who served as members of the Committee during 2018 has had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018:

Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(#)(1)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
($)(2)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future
issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(#)(3)
 
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
902,392
n/a
12,377,392
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total
902,392
n/a
12,377,392
(1)Represents 902,392 shares of Company common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to RSUs (assuming maximum achievement of the applicable performance metrics) that were outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Pursuant to SEC guidance, unvested restricted shares issued pursuant to RSAs that were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 are not included in columns (a) or (c) of this table.
(2)The weighted-average exercise price of the RSUs identified in column (a) is listed as “n/a” in column (b) since there is no exercise or purchase price for such RSUs.
(3)Represents shares of Company common stock that remained available for future issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2018, excluding shares identified in column (a) that are reserved for issuance pursuant to RSUs, as well as unvested shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to RSAs, that were outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Under the terms of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the number of shares available for future issuance increases annually on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2014 by a number of shares equal to the excess of (x) 10% of the number of outstanding shares on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year over (y) the number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2019, the number of shares of Company common stock remaining available for future issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan was increased by 367,510 shares to 12,744,902 shares.

53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Apollo-Värde Transaction

On June 25, 2018, the Acquisition Entity, an entity formed by an investor group led by funds managed by affiliates of Apollo and Värde, collectively the “Apollo-Värde Group,” completed its purchase of 54,937,500 shares of Company common stock formerly beneficially owned by SFH, an entity owned primarily by a private equity fund managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC and its affiliates (“Fortress”), representing the entire holdings of our stock beneficially owned by Fortress (approximately 40.5% of Company common stock that was issued and outstanding as of such date) (the “Apollo-Värde Transaction”). As a result, the Apollo-Värde Group is our largest stockholder and has significant influence over all matters requiring a stockholder vote.

A&R Stockholders Agreement

General

On June 25, 2018, in connection with the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction, the Company and the Acquisition Entity entered into an amended and restated stockholders agreement (the “A&R Stockholders Agreement”) containing, among other things, certain provisions described below. As discussed further below, the A&R Stockholders Agreement provides certain rights to the Acquisition Entity with respect to the designation of directors for nomination and election to the Board, as well as registration rights for certain of our securities beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees (collectively, the “Stockholders”). The term “Permitted Transferees” and other capitalized terms used but not defined in this discussion have the respective meanings given to them in the A&R Stockholders Agreement.

The A&R Stockholders Agreement provides that the parties thereto will use their respective reasonable efforts, including voting or causing to be voted all of our voting shares beneficially owned by each, so that no amendment is made to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws in effect as of the date of the A&R Stockholders Agreement (i) that would add restrictions to the transferability of our shares by the Stockholders, which are beyond those provided for in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the A&R Stockholders Agreement or applicable securities laws or (ii) that nullify the rights set out in the A&R Stockholders Agreement of the Stockholders unless such amendment is approved by such Stockholder.

Designation and Election of Directors

The A&R Stockholders Agreement provides that, for so long as the A&R Stockholders Agreement is in effect, we and each Stockholder shall take all reasonable actions within our respective control (including voting or causing to be voted all of the securities held of record or beneficially owned by such Stockholder entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors and, with respect to us, including in the slate of nominees recommended by the Board those individuals designated by the Acquisition Entity) so as to elect to the Board, and to cause to continue in office:

a number of directors equal to a majority of the Board, plus one director, who are designated by the Acquisition Entity, for so long as the Acquisition Entity directly or indirectly beneficially owns, together with its Permitted Transferees, at least 33% of our voting power;
a number of directors equal to a majority of the Board, minus one director, who are designated by the Acquisition Entity, for so long as the Acquisition Entity directly or indirectly beneficially owns, together with its Permitted Transferees, less than 33% but at least 20% of our voting power, provided that if the Board consists of six or fewer directors, then the Acquisition Entity shall have the right to designate two directors;

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a number of directors (rounded up to the nearest whole number) that would be required to maintain the Acquisition Entity’s proportional representation on the Board who are designated by the Acquisition Entity for so long as the Acquisition Entity directly or indirectly beneficially owns, together with its Permitted Transferees, less than 20% but at least 10% of our voting power, provided that if the Board consists of six or fewer directors, then the Acquisition Entity shall have the right to designate two directors; and
a number of directors (rounded up to the nearest whole number) that would be required to maintain the Acquisition Entity’s proportional representation on the Board who are designated by the Acquisition Entity for so long as the Acquisition Entity directly or indirectly beneficially owns, together with its Permitted Transferees, less than 10% but at least 5% of our voting power, provided that if the Board consists of six or fewer directors, then the Acquisition Entity shall have the right to designate one director.

In accordance with the A&R Stockholders Agreement, the Acquisition Entity has designated Messrs. Becker, Mamik, Michelini, Sinensky and Smith and Ms. Soranno Keating.

Matters Reserved for Approval of the Disinterested Directors

For as long as the Stockholders have beneficial ownership of at least 20% of the common stock, the following actions shall require the approval of the majority of our directors who are disinterested and independent under Delaware law: (i) any transaction or series of transactions between any Stockholder or any of their respective affiliates, on the one hand, and the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the other hand, that could reasonably be expected to have a value in excess of $30,000,000 (other than ordinary course purchases of asset-backed securities from the Company or any of its subsidiaries on arms-length, market terms in an amount not exceeding $500,000,000 in any transaction); (ii) any enforcement or waiver of the rights of the Company or any of its subsidiaries under any agreement between the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any Stockholder or any of their respective affiliates, on the other hand; and (iii) any management, monitoring, service, transaction or other similar fee payable to any Stockholder or any of their respective affiliates, with the exception of certain pre-approved transactions.

Indemnification of the Acquisition Entity

The A&R Stockholders Agreement provides that we will indemnify the Acquisition Entity and its officers, directors, employees, agents and affiliates against losses arising out of third-party claims (including litigation matters and other claims) based on, arising out of or resulting from:

the Acquisition Entity’s status as an equity holder of the Company;
the ownership or the operation of our assets or properties and the operation or conduct of our business; and
any other activities we engage in.

In addition, we have agreed to indemnify the Acquisition Entity and its officers, directors, employees, agents and affiliates against losses, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Exchange Act, relating to actual or alleged misstatements in or omissions from any registration statement, prospectus, preliminary prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto, other than misstatements or omissions made in reliance on information relating to and furnished by the Acquisition Entity for use in the preparation of that registration statement or report.

55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Registration Rights

Demand Rights.   Each Stockholder has, for so long as such Stockholder directly or indirectly beneficially owns, together with Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees, an amount of Company common stock (whether owned at the time of the offering or subsequently acquired) equal to or greater than 1% of our shares of common stock then issued and outstanding (a “Registrable Amount”), “demand” registration rights that allow the Stockholder, for itself and for the Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees, at any time after 180 days following the date of the A&R Stockholders Agreement, to request that we register under the Securities Act an amount equal to or greater than a Registrable Amount. The Stockholder, for itself and for the Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees, will be entitled to unlimited demand registrations so long as such persons, together, beneficially own a Registrable Amount. We will not be required to effect any demand registration within one month of a “firm commitment” underwritten offering to which the requestor held “piggyback” rights, described below, and which included at least 50% of the shares of common stock requested by the requestor to be included. We will not be obligated to grant a request for a demand registration within one month of any other demand registration.

Piggyback Rights.   For so long as Stockholders beneficially own a Registrable Amount and subject to certain other conditions, Stockholders have “piggyback” registration rights that allow them to include the common stock that they own in any public offering of equity securities initiated by us (other than those public offerings pursuant to registration statements on Forms S-4 or S-8 or pursuant to an employee benefit plan arrangement) or by any of our other stockholders that have registration rights. These “piggyback” registration rights will be subject to proportional cutbacks based on the manner of the offering and the identity of the party initiating such offering.

Shelf Registration.   We granted to the Acquisition Entity and its Permitted Transferees, for so long as the Acquisition Entity, together with its Permitted Transferees, beneficially owns a Registrable Amount, the right to request a shelf registration on Form S-3 providing for offerings of Company common stock to be made on a continuous basis until all shares covered by such registration have been sold, subject to our right to suspend the use of the shelf registration prospectuses for a reasonable period of time (not exceeding 60 days in succession or 90 days in the aggregate in any 12-month period) if we determine that certain disclosures required by the shelf registration statements would be detrimental to us or our stockholders. In addition, Stockholders may elect to participate in such shelf registrations within five days after notice of the registration is given.

Indemnification; Expenses; Lock-ups

Under our A&R Stockholders Agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the applicable selling Stockholder and its officers, directors, employees, managers, members, partners, agents and controlling persons against any losses or damages resulting from any untrue statement or omission of material fact in any registration statement or prospectus pursuant to which it sells shares of Company common stock, unless such liability arose from the applicable selling Stockholder’s misstatement or omission, and the applicable selling Stockholder will agree to indemnify us against all losses caused by its misstatements or omissions. We will pay all registration and offering-related expenses incidental to our performance under the A&R Stockholders Agreement, and the applicable selling Stockholder will pay its portion of all underwriting discounts, commissions and transfer taxes, if any, relating to the sale of its shares of common stock under the A&R Stockholders Agreement. We have entered into, and have caused our officers and directors to enter into, lock-up agreements in connection with any exercise of registration rights by the Acquisition Entity and its permitted transferees.

56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Observer Rights

Under our A&R Stockholders Agreement, for so long as the Stockholders have beneficial ownership of Company common stock representing at least 10% of the voting power, the Acquisition Entity shall have the right to designate up to three non-voting representatives to attend meetings of our Board and committees of the Board.

Transactions with Affiliates

SpringCastle.   As a result of the closing of the Apollo-Värde Transaction on June 25, 2018, Fortress is no longer an affiliate of the Company and, accordingly, our relationship as servicer for the SpringCastle Portfolio no longer constitutes a related party transaction. From January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018, we received $16 million in servicing fee revenue for servicing loans included in the SpringCastle Funding Trust 2016-A securitization and certain loan accounts beneficially owned by SpringCastle America, LLC, SpringCastle Credit, LLC and SpringCastle Finance, LLC that are not included in the SpringCastle Funding Trust 2016-A securitization. At June 30, 2018 the servicing fees receivable from the SpringCastle Funding Trust were $2.4 million.

Subservicing Agreement.   Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar Mortgage”) subservices the real estate loans of certain of our indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Owners”). Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar Mortgage. The Owners paid Nationstar Mortgage subservicing fees of $434,000 from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018.

Apollo Group Affiliates.   Affiliates of members of the Apollo Group (as defined below) and/or members of the Apollo Group (collectively, the “Apollo Group Investors”) own, acquire and may continue to own and acquire the Company’s and SFC’s securities, including SFC-sponsored asset-backed securities and securitization debt (“SFC Securities”), in the ordinary course of business of such Apollo Group Investors. Athene Holding Ltd. (“Athene”), and/or one or more of its subsidiaries, in the ordinary course of its business, acquires, owns and may continue to acquire and own SFC Securities, including in senior and junior tranches thereof. Members of the Apollo Group own a significant equity interest in Athene and control 45% of the total voting power of Athene. Such SFC Securities were acquired by Apollo Group Investors and Athene and/or a subsidiary thereof from the related underwriter on terms that were the same as those that were offered to other investors in such SFC Securities. The Company, through its indirectly owned insurance companies, owns Apollo debt securities, which were selected by an independent investment adviser with full investment discretion over the insurance companies’ portfolio.

Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures

Under SEC rules, a related person is an officer, director, nominee for director or beneficial holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing. We have adopted a written policy (the “Related Party Transaction Policy”) that establishes procedures for approving (a) any transaction between (i) a related person or Related Entity, as defined below (related persons and Related Entities being referred to herein as “Covered Persons”), on the one hand, and (ii) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the other hand, where such Covered Person has a direct or indirect material interest and the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000 or (b) any other transaction providing for the payment by the Company or any of its subsidiaries of any management, monitoring, service, transaction or other similar fee to any one or more members of the Apollo Group (each, a “Related Party Transaction”). As provided in the Related Party Transaction Policy and in the charter of the Audit Committee, and except as the Board may otherwise determine from time to time, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance (or ratifying, if applicable) any Related Party Transactions. In determining whether to approve or ratify a Related Party Transaction, the Audit Committee is required to consider, among other factors it deems appropriate, benefits to the Company, whether the terms of the Related Party Transaction are generally

57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

available to unrelated third parties, and the extent of the Covered Person’s interest in the Related Party Transaction. In addition, except as described in the following sentence, if the Company’s legal department determines a Related Party Transaction involves a member of the Apollo Group, such proposed Related Party Transaction must be submitted to the independent directors of the Board who are disinterested and independent under Delaware law (the “Disinterested Directors”) as to the matter under consideration prior to the consummation of such proposed Related Party Transaction. A Related Party Transaction involving an Ordinary Course Related Entity does not require review or approval under the Related Party Transaction Policy (a) where the amount involved is less than $30,000,000, and such Related Party Transaction does not involve either (i) the purchase of asset-backed securities from the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (ii) the payment by the Company or a subsidiary thereof of a management, monitoring, service, transaction or other similar fee payable to any Ordinary Course Related Entity, or (b) both (i) such Related Party Transaction is an ordinary course purchase by a Related Entity of asset-backed securities from the Company or any of its subsidiaries in an amount not exceeding $500,000,000 in any transaction or series of related transactions (which, for purposes hereof, shall mean an amount not exceeding $500,000,000 in the aggregate for all tranches purchased in any issuance), and (ii) such Related Entity does not purchase more than 70% of any tranche of such asset-backed securities, as long as any Related Party Transaction described in the preceding clause (a) or (b) is made on arm’s-length, fair market terms. In addition, neither the Company nor any subsidiary thereof shall enforce or waive any right under any agreement between the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any Ordinary Course Related Entity, on the other hand, without the prior approval of a majority of the Disinterested Directors. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to its chair or, where applicable, to the Disinterested Directors, to approve or ratify any Related Party Transactions between Audit Committee meetings.

For purposes of the Related Party Transactions Policy:

“Apollo Group” means (a) Apollo, (b) Athene, (c) Athora Holding Ltd. (“Athora”), (d) any investment fund or other collective investment vehicle whose general partner or managing member is owned, directly or indirectly, by Apollo or by one or more of Apollo’s subsidiaries, (e) BRH Holdings GP, Ltd. and its shareholders, (f) any executive officer of Apollo, Athene or Athora whom Apollo, Athene or Athora (as applicable) designates, in a written notice delivered to the Company, as a member of the Apollo Group for purposes of the Related Party Transaction Policy (which designation shall continue in effect until such designee ceases to be an executive officer of Apollo, Athene or Athora, as applicable) and (g) any affiliate of a person described in clause (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) above; provided, none of (i) the Company, (ii) any subsidiary of the Company, (iii) any person employed by (A) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (B) Athene or any of its subsidiaries or (C) Athora or any of its subsidiaries shall be deemed to be a member of the Apollo Group, unless such natural person is designated as a member of the Apollo Group as described in clause (f) above. For avoidance of doubt, any person managed by Apollo or by one or more of Apollo’s subsidiaries pursuant to a managed account agreement (or similar arrangement) without Apollo or one or more of Apollo’s subsidiaries controlling such person as a general partner or managing member shall not be part of the Apollo Group. The inclusion of Athene, Athora and their respective subsidiaries in the definition of “Apollo Group” is solely for the purposes of the Related Party Transaction Policy, and shall not imply that Apollo or any of its affiliates controls any such entity from an accounting, regulatory or control perspective;
“Ordinary Course Related Entity” means (a) any member of the Apollo Group and (b) any Related Entity that is either a direct or indirect limited partner of the Acquisition Entity or an affiliate of such a direct or indirect limited partner; and

58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“Related Entity” means (i) any entity that directly or indirectly owns more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, and any affiliate of such entity, (ii) each member of the Apollo Group for as long as Section 3.04 of the A&R Stockholders Agreement is in effect and (iii) any entity in which a related person is employed or is a general partner or principal or in which such person has at least a 5% beneficial ownership interest.

59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AUDIT FUNCTION

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is a standing committee of the Board that comprises solely non-employee directors who have been affirmatively determined to be “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE Listing Standards and Section 10A of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter that is available under the Corporate Governance tab in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com/investor.onemainfinancial.com and is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., c/o Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, IN 47708, Attention: Secretary.

Indiana 47708.

The Company’s management is responsible for the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the Company’s overall financial reporting process. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with GAAP. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. The Audit Committee is also solely responsible for the selection and termination of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including the approval of audit fees and any permissible non-audit services provided by and fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm. See “Board of Directors — Board of Directors—Structure — Committees of the Board of Directors—— Audit Committee” above for additional information regarding the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Audit Committee:

60


Reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with management;

Discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301 – Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”); and the SEC governing communications between auditors and audit committees, including the scope of the audit, the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates, new accounting guidance and the critical audit matter addressed during the audit; and

Received the written disclosures and the letters from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP their independence.

Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Roy A. Guthrie, Chairman
Peter B. Sinensky
Richard A. Smith

60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services, including the fees and terms thereof, to be performed for us and our subsidiaries by our independent registered public accounting firm, Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP (the “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”). The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy and implemented procedures that provide that all engagements of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, except for such services that fall within the de minimis exception for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that our Audit Committee approves prior to the completionBoard of the audit. The pre-approval policy also permits the delegation of pre-approval authority to a member of the Audit Committee between meetings of the committee, and any such approvals are reviewed and ratified by the committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the committee the authority to pre-approve permissible non-audit services.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, professional services were performed for us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, pursuant to the oversight of our Audit Committee. Set forth below are the fees billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. All fees and services were pre-approvedDirectors

Roy A. Guthrie
Philip L. Bronner
Richard A. Smith
61

Information about Stock Ownership
Persons Owning More than 5% of OneMain Stock
The following table shows as of March 31, 2022, the most recent practicable date according to publicly available information, the beneficial ownership of shares of Company common stock by each stockholder known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of Company common stock. As of March 31, 2022, there were 125,779,365 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding.
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class
The Vanguard Group(1)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
12,377,3959.84%
FMR LLC(2)
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
11,640,8089.25%
Värde Partners, Inc.(3)
901 Marquette Ave. S, Suite 3300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
7,552,2926.00%
(1)
All information about The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based on Amendment No. 3 to its Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022. Vanguard reported that it is the beneficial owner of 12,377,395 shares of Company common stock representing 9.56% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2021. Vanguard also reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to 12,239,505 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power of 137,890 shares of common stock.
(2)
All information about FMR LLC (“FMR”) is based on Amendment No. 8 to its Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2022. FMR reported that it is the beneficial owner of 11,640,808 shares of Company common stock representing 8.989% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2021. FMR also reported that it has sole voting power over 1,264,069 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 11,640,808 shares of common stock. FMR also disclosed the following: Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR. The Johnson family group and all other Series B stockholders have entered into a stockholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the stockholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR.
(3)
All information about Värde is based on Amendment No. 4 to its Schedule 13D (the “Värde Schedule 13D”) filed with the SEC on October 18, 2021 by Värde Partners, Inc. (“Värde”) and the other reporting persons listed therein. Värde reported that: each of Värde Partners, Inc., Värde Partners, L.P., Uniform Investco GP LLC, Uniform Investco LP, Ilfryn C. Carstairs and George G. Hicks beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 7,552,292 shares of Company common stock; Uniform InvestCo Sub L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 4,944,066 shares of Company common stock; each of The Värde Specialty Finance Fund G.P., L.P., The Värde Specialty Finance Fund U.G.P., LLC and Värde SFLT, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 1,888,073 shares of Company common stock; each of The Värde Fund XII UGP, LLC, The Värde Fund XII G.P., L.P. and The Värde Fund XII (Master), L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 1,306,546 shares of Company common stock; Värde Investment Partners, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 1,268,785 shares of Company common stock; each of Värde Credit Partners UGP, LLC, Värde Credit Partners G.P., L.P. and Värde Credit Partners Master, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 1,004,455 shares of Company common stock; each of The Värde Skyway Fund UGP, LLC, The Värde Skyway Fund G.P., L.P. and The Värde Skyway Master Fund, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 853,409 shares of Company common stock; each of Värde Investment Partners UGP, LLC and Värde Investment Partners G.P., L.P., beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 2,499,809 shares of Company common stock; Värde Investment Partners (Offshore) Master, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 876,066 shares of Company common stock;
62

and The Värde Fund VI-A, L.P. beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 354,958 shares of Company common stock. Various relationships among such persons are described in the Värde Schedule 13D. As set forth in the Värde Schedule 13D, the principal address of each of the foregoing persons other than Mr. Carstairs is c/o Värde Partners, Inc., 901 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402; the principal address of Mr. Carstairs is Värde Partners Asia Pte. Ltd., 6 Battery Road #21-01, Singapore 049909.
63

OneMain Stock Beneficially Owned by Officers and Directors
The following table shows as of March 31, 2022, the most recent practicable date according to publicly available information, the beneficial ownership of shares of Company common stock by: (i) each present director, including the nominees for re-election at the Annual Meeting; (ii) the Company’s NEOs; and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company, as a group. As of March 31, 2022, there were 125,779,365 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding. Beneficial ownership means that the individual has or shares voting power or dispositive power with respect to the shares of Company common stock or the individual has the right to acquire the shares within 60 days following March 31, 2022. Unless otherwise stated, the address for each beneficial owner is c/o Secretary, OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708. None of the directors or executive officers listed below owns 1% or more of the Company’s common stock, individually or in the aggregate.
NameCommon
Stock
Right to
Acquire
Total
Douglas H. Shulman199,3720199,372
Micah R. Conrad40,821040,821
Rajive Chadha31,7498,84440,593
Philip L. Bronner4380438
Phyllis R. Caldwell1,73901,739
Toos N. Daruvala000
Roy A. Guthrie(1)13,79718,85132,648
Valerie Soranno Keating21,538021,538
Aneek S. Mamik(2)1,18001,180
Richard A. Smith8,7305,57514,305
Directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)319,36433,270352,634
(1)
Mr. Guthrie is the Investment Manager of Guthrie 2012 Investments LP, which owns 13,797 shares of common stock. Mr. Guthrie disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by Guthrie 2012 Investments LP except to the extent of his direct pecuniary interest therein.
(2)
The amount included in the table above represents Mr. Mamik’s personal holdings in the Company’s common stock. Mr. Mamik is an affiliate of Värde and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Company common stock through entities affiliated with Värde as described in footnote 3 to the “Persons Owning More than 5% of OneMain Stock” table above, although Mr. Mamik disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by Värde except to the extent of his indirect pecuniary interest therein, if any.
64

Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2021:
Plan Category
Number of securities to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(2)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column)(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1,900,96912,339,199
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total1,900,96912,339,199
(1)
Represents 1,900,969 shares of Company common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to RSUs (assuming maximum achievement of the applicable performance metrics) that were outstanding as of December 31, 2021.
(2)
There is no exercise or purchase price for such RSUs.
(3)
Represents shares of Company common stock that remained available for future issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2021, excluding shares identified in column (a) that are reserved for issuance pursuant to RSUs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2021. Under the terms of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the number of shares available for future issuance increases annually on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2014 by a number of shares equal to the excess of  (x) 10% of the number of outstanding shares on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year over (y) the number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2022, the number of shares of Company common stock remaining available for future issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan was increased by 441,765 shares to 12,780,964 shares.
65

Additional Information
Questions and Answers on the Annual Meeting and Voting
Q:
What is this document?
A:
This document is called a proxy statement and includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the SEC and NYSE. This proxy statement is used by the Company’s Board of Directors to solicit proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders an opportunity to vote on the matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting, even if they cannot attend the meeting.
Q:
Who pays the cost of soliciting proxies?
A:
We are making this solicitation and will pay all costs of soliciting proxies. The solicitation of proxies or votes may be made by mail, in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by our directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We also will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders.
Q:
How is the Company distributing proxy materials?
A:
We are using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. In accordance with this rule, on or about April 29, 2022, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. By doing so, we save costs and reduce our impact on the environment. The Notice tells you how to:

view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, including this proxy statement and the OneMain Holdings, Inc. Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, on the Internet and vote; and

instruct us to send proxy materials to you by mail or email.
You may also request delivery of an individual copy of the proxy statement and 2021 Annual Report by contacting us by mail at OneMain Holdings, Inc., c/o Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708 or by calling our Investor Relations department at (212) 359-2432.
Q:
What happens if multiple stockholders share the same address?
A:
If you and others who share your mailing address own Company common stock through bank or brokerage accounts, you may have received a notice that your household will receive only one copy of the proxy statement and 2021 Annual Report or Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce the volume of duplicate information and reduce printing and postage costs. You may discontinue householding by contacting your bank or broker.
Q:
When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?
A:
The meeting will be held on June 13, 2022, at our corporate offices located at 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, beginning at 3:00 p.m. Central Time. Stockholders may obtain directions to the location of the meeting by contacting the Company’s Secretary at 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Telephone: 812-424-8031. See “What if the Annual Meeting cannot be held as currently scheduled?” below for more information.
66

Q:
How do I attend the Annual Meeting?
A:
Admission to the Annual Meeting is limited to Company stockholders or their proxy holders. In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be asked to present proof of stock ownership and a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license. Proof of stock ownership may consist of the proxy card, or if shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, i.e., in “street name,” an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you beneficially owned shares of Company common stock at the close of business on April 21, 2022, the record date for the Annual Meeting.
Q:
What if the Annual Meeting cannot be held as currently scheduled?
A:
We currently plan to hold the Annual Meeting in person. However, we continue to actively monitor public health and travel safety concerns relating to COVID-19 and the advisories or mandates that federal, state and local governments and related agencies, may issue. In the event we determine that it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting as currently planned, we will publicly announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting in a different location or solely by means of remote communication (i.e., a virtual-only annual meeting). If you are planning to attend our Annual Meeting, please check the Investor Relations section of our website, which can be accessed at http://investor.onemainfinancial.com, prior to the meeting date for any updated information.
Q:
What is the structure of our Board of Directors?
A:
Our Board consists of eight members divided into three classes. Each class serves a three-year term. Three Class III directors are up for re-election at the Annual Meeting.
Q:
What matters will stockholders vote on at the meeting?
A:
You will be voting on the following:
1.
To elect three Class III directors, Valerie Soranno Keating, Aneek S. Mamik and Richard A. Smith, to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting and until such director’s successor has been elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal (the “Director Election Proposal”).
2.
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for OneMain Holdings, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2022 (the “Auditor Ratification Proposal”).
3.
Such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Q:
What are the Board’s voting recommendations?
A:
The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposal 1, the Director Election Proposal, and “FOR” Proposal 2, the Auditor Ratification Proposal.
Q:
Who may vote at the meeting?
A:
All stockholders who owned shares of Company common stock at the close of business on the record date of April 21, 2022 may attend and vote at the meeting.
Q:
How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?
A:
You can vote either in person at the meeting or by proxy whether you attend the meeting or not. You can vote by telephone or Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you are a registered holder of shares of Company common stock, you can also vote by mail by completing, signing, dating
67

and returning your proxy card. If you hold your shares of our common stock beneficially in street name, you may submit proxies by following the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee. See “What If I Am A ‘Beneficial Owner?’” below for more information. If you sign your proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted as recommended by the Board. The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically is 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on June 12, 2022.
Q:
What if I am a “Beneficial Owner?”
A:
If you are a “beneficial owner,” also known as a “street name” holder (that is, you hold your shares of our common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will receive voting instructions (including, if your broker, bank or other nominee elects to do so, instructions on how to vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet) from the record holder, and you must follow those instructions to have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting.
Q:
How do I change my voting instructions before the meeting?
A:
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary at 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708;

submitting another signed proxy card with a later date;

submitting another proxy by telephone or over the Internet at a later date; or

attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
If your shares are held in “street name,” please follow the directions given by the institution that holds your shares to change or revoke your voting instructions.
Q:
Is my vote confidential?
A:
We keep all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations confidential as a matter of practice. We permit only our inspector of election to examine these documents. If you write comments on your proxy card or ballot, the proxy card or ballot may be forwarded to our management and the Board to review your comments.
Q:
How many votes do I have?
A:
You will have one vote for each share of Company common stock that you owned at the close of business on April 21, 2022, the record date for the meeting.
Q:
How many shares of stock are eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting?
A:
At the close of business on April 21, 2022, there were a total of 125,211,094 shares of Company common stock issued and outstanding and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Q:
How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?
A:
The holders of a majority of the shares of Company common stock outstanding as of the record date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present, in person or by proxy, in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. In determining whether a quorum is present, shares represented by votes to withhold, abstentions and broker non-votes will be deemed present at the Annual Meeting. Once a share is deemed present for any purpose at the Annual Meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Annual Meeting.
Q:
How many votes are required to elect directors and adopt other proposals?
A:
Proposal 1 — Director Election Proposal: Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of holders of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum is present.
68

Accordingly, the three nominees named in this proxy statement with the highest number of  “FOR” votes will be elected. Votes to withhold and broker non-votes, if any, will not have any effect on the election of a director.
Proposal 2 — Ratification of Auditors Proposal: Approval of the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Abstentions will be counted as present and entitled to vote on this proposal and will therefore have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. We do not expect there to be any broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.
Other business: All other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on any such other business.
Q:
How will voting on any other business be conducted?
A:
We do not know of any other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If matters other than the ones listed in this proxy statement properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by the proxy according to their judgment.
Q:
What is the effect of abstentions and broker “non-votes”?
A:
Proxies marked “abstain” or proxies required to be treated as broker “non-votes” are considered present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the Annual Meeting.
A broker non-vote occurs when you fail to provide your broker with voting instructions on a particular proposal that is non-routine. Brokers only have discretionary authority to vote your shares on proposals that are considered a “routine” matter.
The only routine matter scheduled to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting is the Ratification of Auditors Proposal. The Director Election Proposal is considered non-routine. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, it is critical that you instruct your broker or other nominee how to vote on the Director Election Proposal if you want your shares to count in the vote rather than be treated as a broker non-vote.
Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the Director Election Proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal. No broker non-votes are expected in connection with the Ratification of Auditors Proposal, which is considered a routine matter.
Q:
Who will tabulate and count the votes?
A:
Representatives or agents of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as the Company’s inspector of election.
Q:
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
A:
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and report final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we intend to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.
Q:
How do I submit a stockholder proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials in connection with the 2023 Annual Meeting?
A:
Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed by us in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit their proposals to our Secretary on or before December 30, 2022.
69

All stockholder proposals must be addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., c/o Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708.
Q:
How do I submit a stockholder proposal for consideration at the 2023 Annual Meeting?
A:
Stockholders who wish to present a proposal for consideration at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but who do not wish to include such proposal in the proxy materials to be distributed by us in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, must provide notice thereof to our Secretary on or before March 15, 2023.
Apart from Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, certain procedures must be followed under our Bylaws for a stockholder to introduce an item of business at an annual meeting of stockholders.
If our Annual Meeting is held on June 13, 2022, as expected, any stockholder proposal for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card in respect of such meeting will be considered untimely under our Bylaws if it is received by us prior to February 13, 2023 or after March 15, 2023. An untimely proposal may not be brought before or considered at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Any stockholder proposal notice submitted must also be made in compliance with our Bylaws.
All notices must be addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., c/o Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708. The chairman of our Annual Meeting may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any stockholder proposal not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.
Q:
How do I submit a director nomination for consideration at the 2023 Annual Meeting?
A:
Stockholders who wish to present a director nomination for consideration at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must provide notice thereof to our Secretary on or before March 15, 2023.
Certain procedures must be followed under our Bylaws for a stockholder to nominate persons for election as directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.
If our Annual Meeting is held on June 13, 2022, as expected, a notice of director nomination for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card in respect of such meeting will be considered untimely under our Bylaws if it is received by us prior to February 13, 2023 or after March 15, 2023. An untimely proposal may not be brought before or considered at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Any notice of a director nomination submitted must also be made in compliance with our Bylaws. In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19. For more information regarding our procedures for director nominations as set forth in our Bylaws, please refer to “Corporate Governance — The Board of Directors — Selection of Director Nominees.”
All notices of director nominations must be addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., c/o Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708. The chairman of our Annual Meeting may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any director nomination not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.
70

Q:
How do I contact the Board?
A:
Our Board welcomes feedback. Any Company stockholder or other interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board or any of its members may do so by writing to the Board of Directors (or any one or more members):
c/o Secretary
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
601 NW Second Street
Evansville, Indiana 47708
Stockholders may also visit: https://investor.onemainfinancial.com/corporate-governance/contact-the-board/default.aspx.
Q:
Where can I find additional information?
A:
The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, amendments to these reports and other information with the SEC. These reports can be accessed, free of charge, on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or through our Investor Relations website, http://investor.onemainfinancial.com, under the heading “Financials & Filings.”
We will also provide, without charge to each stockholder upon written request, a copy of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to those reports. Written requests for copies can be made by mail to: Secretary, 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708 or by telephone at (812) 424-8031.
71

Appendix
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators
This proxy statement contains certain financial metrics that we use, among other factors, to assess performance under our annual incentive program and with respect to PSU awards. These metrics include C&I Capital Generation, C&I Net Charge-Offs, C&I Operating Expenses and C&I ROR under our annual incentive program, and Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth and Economic Average Unlevered Return and, for awards granted in 2021, Economic Earnings Average Growth, with respect to PSU awards. Of these metrics, C&I Capital Generation, C&I Operating Expenses, C&I ROR, Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth, Economic Average Unlevered Return and Economic Earnings Average Growth are calculated on a basis other than in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The tables below present the quantitative metrics provided in connection with our executive compensation program (other than the number of customer accounts outstanding) and, for each non-GAAP financial measure, a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. These metrics, as well as the Managed Receivables metric, which is a key performance indicator, are calculated as follows:

C&I Capital Generation (non-GAAP) is equal to C&I adjusted net income, excluding the after-tax change in C&I allowance for finance receivable losses.

C&I Net Charge-Offs represent annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average net receivables in the C&I segment.

C&I Operating Expenses (non-GAAP) are operating expenses that are directly correlated to the C&I segment, adjusted to exclude the impact of the Performance Option Awards and direct costs associated with COVID-19.

C&I ROR (non-GAAP) is determined on an adjusted C&I basis, and is the sum of C&I interest income on finance receivables and C&I other revenues, less C&I Net Charge-Offs, C&I Operating Expenses and insurance policy benefits and claims, divided by average C&I net receivables.

Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth (non-GAAP), which was used in connection with PSU awards previously granted to our NEOs, is Economic Earnings Average Growth divided by the fully diluted average outstanding shares.

Economic Average Unlevered Return (non-GAAP) is the simple three year average of the annual economic unlevered return on receivables percentage, which is defined as pre-tax income, excluding the impact of changes in the loan loss reserve, interest expense and intangible amortization, divided by average net receivables.

Economic Earnings Average Growth (non-GAAP) is the simple three year average of Economic Earnings, which is defined as GAAP net income excluding after-tax impact of changes in loan loss reserve and intangible amortization.

Managed Receivables is the sum of C&I net finance receivables and finance receivables serviced for our whole loan sale partners.
Our non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. In the context of our executive compensation program we believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to evaluate the performance of our business.
In many cases, non-GAAP financial measures are determined by adjusting the most directly comparable GAAP measure to exclude non-GAAP adjustments that we believe are not representative of our underlying business performance. Readers should consider the limitations associated with these non-GAAP financial measures, including the potential lack of comparability of these measures from one company to another.
A-1

C&I Adjusted Pretax Income (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in millions)
FY21
Consumer & Insurance$1,788
Other(7)
Segment to GAAP Adjustment(40)
Income Before Income Taxes – GAAP basis$1,741
Pretax Income — Segment Accounting Basis$1,788
Cash-Settled Performance Option Awards54
Direct Costs Associated with COVID-196
Acquisition-Related Transaction and Integration Expenses0
Net Loss on Repurchases and Repayments of Debt70
Net Gain on Sale of Cost Method Investment0
Restructuring Charges0
C&I Adjusted Pretax Income (non-GAAP)$1,918
Reconciling Items(1)$(171)
(1)
Reconciling items consist of Total Segment to GAAP Adjustment and the adjustments to Pretax Income (Loss) – Segment Accounting Basis.
Supplemental C&I Segment Metrics
(unaudited, $ in millions)
12/31/2021
Consumer & Insurance$19,215
Segment to GAAP Adjustment(3)
Net Finance Receivables – GAAP basis$19,212
Consumer & Insurance$2,102
Segment to GAAP Adjustment(7)
Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses – GAAP basis$2,095
Managed Receivables
C&I Net Finance Receivables$19,215
Finance Receivables Serviced for our Whole Loan Sale Partners414
Managed Receivables$19,629
A-2

C&I Adjusted Pretax Income and Adjusted Net Income (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in millions, except per share statistics)
FY21
Interest Income$4,355
Interest Expense(930)
Provision for Finance Receivable Losses(587)
Net Interest Income after Provision for Finance Receivable Losses$2,838
Insurance434
Investment65
Gain on Sales of Finance Receivables47
Other51
Total Other Revenues$597
Operating Expenses(1,341)
Insurance Policy Benefits and Claims(176)
Total Other Expenses$(1,517)
C&I Adjusted Pretax Income (non-GAAP)$1,918
Income Taxes(1)
(480)
C&I Adjusted Net Income (non-GAAP)$1,438
C&I Adjusted Diluted EPS$10.81
(1)
Income taxes assume a 25% tax rate for 2021.
C&I Risk Adjusted Margin and Unlevered ROR (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in accordance with the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy.

Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2018
2017
Audit Fees
$
15,919
 
$
16,172
 
Audit-Related Fees
 
411
 
 
421
 
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
 
536
 
 
129
 
Total Fees
$
16,866
 
$
16,722
 

Audit Fees.   Audit fees primarily related to the annual audits of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for OMH and SFC, the annual audit of internal control over financial reporting for OMH, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the reviews of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for OMH and SFC and statutory audits of insurance subsidiaries of OMH.

Audit-Related Fees.   Audit-related fees primarily related to audit fees for agreed upon procedures and a SOC 1 Report (Service Organization Controls Report) for the loan servicing system used in connection with servicing the SpringCastle loan portfolio.

Tax Fees.   We did not pay any fees to our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm during 2017 or 2018 related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees.   For 2018, All Other Fees related to an assessment of omnichannel sales and originations operations and a cybersecurity compliance assessment performed by our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. For 2017, All Other Fees related to a cybersecurity gap assessment performed by our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Board is asking stockholders to ratify this appointment. Although SEC regulations and the NYSE listing requirements require the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to be engaged, retained and supervised by the Audit Committee, the Board considers the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm to be an important matter for stockholders to provide input to the Audit Committee and the Board on a key corporate governance issue. If the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not ratified, the matter of the appointment of the independent registered accounting firm will be re-considered by the Audit Committee. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions regarding the Company.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019.

62

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows as of March 28, 2019, the most recent practicable date according to publicly available information, the beneficial ownership of shares of Company common stock by: (i) each present director, including the nominees for re-election at the Annual Meeting; (ii) the Company’s NEOs; (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as of March 28, 2019, as a group; and (iv) each stockholder known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of Company common stock. As of March 28, 2019, there were 136,082,463 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding. Beneficial ownership means that the individual has or shares voting power or dispositive power with respect to the shares of Company common stock or the individual has the right to acquire the shares within 60 days following March 28, 2019. Unless otherwise stated, the address for each beneficial owner is c/o OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, IN 47708, Attention: Secretary.

 
Nature and Amount of
Beneficial Ownership
Name
Shares
Owned
(#)
Percentage
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jay N. Levine(1)
 
3,107,296
 
 
2.28
 
Douglas H. Shulman
 
32,523
 
 
*
 
John C. Anderson
 
1,195,376
 
 
*
 
Bradford D. Borchers
 
92,786
 
 
*
 
Micah R. Conrad(2)
 
0
 
 
*
 
Robert A. Hurzeler
 
179,320
 
 
*
 
Scott T. Parker(2)
 
198,532
 
 
*
 
Marc E. Becker(3)
 
0
 
 
*
 
Roy A. Guthrie(4)
 
22,545
 
 
*
 
Valerie Soranno Keating
 
2,202
 
 
*
 
Aneek S. Mamik(5)
 
1,100
 
 
*
 
Matthew R. Michelini(3)
 
0
 
 
*
 
Peter B. Sinensky(3)
 
0
 
 
*
 
Richard A. Smith
 
2,202
 
 
*
 
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)(6)
 
4,833,882
 
 
3.55
 
5% Stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
OMH Holdings L.P.(7)(8)
 
54,937,500
 
 
40.37
 
Värde Partners, Inc.(8)(9)
 
11,355,568
 
 
8.34
 
FMR LLC(10)
 
11,619,180
 
 
8.54
 
The Vanguard Group(11)
 
7,275,335
 
 
5.35
 
*Indicates less than one percent.millions)FY21
Revenue(1)
(1)Includes 500,000 shares held by the Jay N. Levine 2018 Annuity Trust, of which Mr. Levine is trustee and annuitant. As trustee, Mr. Levine retains voting rights with respect to the shares held by the trust. As a result, Mr. Levine may be deemed to beneficially own such trust shares, although he disclaims beneficial ownership of any such shares held by the trust except to the extent of his pecuniary interest, if any, therein.26.1%
(2)Effective on March 26, 2019 Mr. Parker resigned as our Executive Vice President and CFO and Mr. Conrad was appointed as our Acting CFO (retaining his title of Executive Vice President).
Net Charge-off(4.2%)
(3)Messrs. Becker, Michelini and Sinensky are associated with Apollo Management, L.P. (“Apollo Management”) and its affiliated investment managers, including Apollo Management VIII, L.P. (“Management VIII”), which serves as the manager of Apollo Uniform GP, LLC (“Uniform GP”), the general partner of OMH Holdings, L.P. (the “Acquisition Entity”), which is the record holder of 54,937,500 shares of Company common stock. The table above does not include, with respect to Messrs. Becker, Michelini and Sinensky, the shares held by the Acquisition Entity, or any securities that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Apollo Management, or any of the investment managers or investment advisors affiliated with Apollo Management, and each of
C&I Risk Adjusted Margin21.9%

63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Messrs. Becker, Michelini and Sinensky disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest, if any, therein.

(4)Includes 8,748 beneficially owned shares that Mr. Guthrie has the right to acquire within 60 days following March 28, 2019.
Operating Expenses(7.3%)
(5)The amount included in the table above represents Mr. Mamik’s personal holdings in the Company’s common stock. Mr. Mamik is an affiliate of Värde and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Company common stock through entities affiliated with Värde as described in footnote 8 below, although Mr. Mamik disclaims beneficial ownership of any such shares beneficially owned by Värde except to the extent of his indirect pecuniary interest, if any, in them.
(6)Includes, with respect to all directors and executive officers as of March 28, 2019, as a group, 8,748 beneficially owned shares that may be acquired within 60 days following March 28, 2019.
(7)The Acquisition Entity beneficially owns and has shared voting and dispositive power over 54,937,500 shares of Company common stock. Uniform GP is the general partner of the Acquisition Entity. Management VIII is the non-member manager of Uniform GP. AIF VIII Management, LLC (“AIF VIII”) is the general partner of Management VIII. Apollo Management is the sole member and manager of AIF VIII. Apollo Management GP, LLC (“Management GP”) serves as the general partner of Apollo Management. Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (“Management Holdings”) serves as the sole member and manager of Management GP. Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC (“Management Holdings GP”) serves as the general partner of Management Holdings. The managers and principal executive officers of Management Holdings GP and Messrs. Leon D. Black, Joshua Harris and Marc Rowan. The address of the Acquisition Entity is One Manhattanville Road, Suite 201, Purchase, NY 10577. The address of each of the other persons described in this footnote is 9 West 57th Street, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10019.
(8)See the discussion above under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Stockholders Agreement — Apollo-Värde Transaction.”
(9)Värde is the ultimate owner of the general partners of each of the Uniform InvestCo LP; Uniform InvestCo GP LLC; The Värde Fund VI-A, L.P.; Värde Investment Partners (Offshore) Master, L.P.; Värde Investment Partners, L.P.; Värde Investment Partners G.P., LLC; The Värde Skyway Master Fund, L.P.; The Värde Skyway Fund G.P., LLC; The Värde Fund XII (Master), L.P.; The Värde Fund XII G.P., L.P.; The Värde Fund XII UGP, LLC; Värde Credit Partners Master, L.P.; Värde Credit Partners G.P., LLC; Värde SFLT, L.P.; The Värde Specialty Finance Fund G.P., L.P.; The Värde Specialty Finance Fund U.G.P., LLC; and Värde Partners, L.P. (the “Värde Parties”), or of the general partners’ managing members. Mr. George Hicks is the chief executive officer of Värde Partners, Inc. As such, each of Värde and Mr. Hicks may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares owned by each of the Värde Parties. Each of Värde and Mr. Hicks disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held indirectly through the Värde Parties except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein, and this disclosure shall not be deemed an admission that any such reporting person is the beneficial owner for purposes of this Annual Report or for any other purpose. The address of the Värde Parties is c/o Värde Partners, Inc., 901 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
(10)All information about FMR LLC (“FMR”) is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019. FMR reported that it is the beneficial owner of 11,619,180 shares of Company common stock representing 8.556% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2018. FMR also reported that is has sole dispositive power over 11,619,180 shares of common stock and sole voting power over 681,264 shares of common stock. In the Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR, FMR disclosed the following: Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B stockholders have entered into a stockholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the stockholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR. The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.
(11)All information about The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“TVG”) is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019. TVG reported that it is the beneficial owner of 7,275,335 shares of Company common stock representing 5.35% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2018. TVG also reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 37,542 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,237,954 shares of common stock, shared voting power of 8,765 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power of 37,381 shares of common stock. The address for TVG is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

64

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires certain of the Company’s directors and officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company equity securities to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities with the SEC. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to all of its reporting persons were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER MATTERS

The Board knows of no other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If matters other than the ones listed in this Proxy Statement properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by the proxy according to their judgment.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

We provide stockholders with the opportunity, under certain circumstances and consistent with our Bylaws and the rules of the SEC, to participate in the governance of the Company by submitting proposals and director nominations for consideration at our Annual Meeting of stockholders. Proposals from stockholders are given careful consideration by us in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”). For a proposal to be included in our proxy statement and proxy card for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, such proposal must comply with Rule 14a-8 and must be received by us in writing no later than December 11, 2019.

Additionally, if our Annual Meeting is held on May 21, 2019, as expected, any stockholder proposal or director nomination for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that is not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card in respect of such meeting will be considered untimely under our Bylaws if it is received by us prior to January 23, 2020 or after February 22, 2020. An untimely proposal may not be brought before or considered at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Any stockholder proposal or director nomination submitted must also be made in compliance with our Bylaws. For more information regarding our procedures for director nominations as set forth in our Bylaws, please refer to “Corporate Governance—Criteria and Procedures for Selection of Director Nominees.”

All stockholder proposals and director nominations must be addressed to OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, IN 47708, Attention: Secretary. The chairman of our Annual Meeting of stockholders may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any stockholder proposal or director nomination not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, contains these reports and other information that the Company files electronically with the SEC.

Such information will also be furnished upon written request to OneMain Holdings, Inc., 601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708, Attention: Secretary, and can also be accessed through the Company’s website at http://www.onemainfinancial.com. We will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon oral or written request of any such person, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2018, as filed with the SEC, excluding the exhibits, by first class mail or other equally prompt means within one business day of receipt of such request. Request for copies of such report should be directed to the Company’s Secretary at the above address or at (812) 424-8031.

66

C&I Unlevered ROR (non-GAAP)14.6%
(1)
Revenue includes interest income on finance receivables plus other revenues less insurance policy benefits and claims.
C&I Capital Generation (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in millions)
FY21
Provision for Finance Receivable Losses$587
Net Charge-offs(768)
Change in C&I Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses (non-GAAP)$(181)
C&I Adjusted Pretax Income (non-GAAP)1,918
C&I Pretax Capital Generation (non-GAAP)$1,737
C&I Capital Generation, net of tax(1) (non-GAAP)$1,303
C&I Average Net Receivables18,286
C&I Capital Generation Return on Receivables (non-GAAP)7.1%
(1)
Income taxes assume a 25% tax rate for 2021.
A-3

Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in millions, except per share statistics)
FY18FY19FY20FY21
Net Income(1)$553$855$730$1,314
Adjustments (net of tax)
Change in Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses2574242(131)
Intangible Amortization39342824
Economic Earnings (non-GAAP)$617$963$1,000$1,207
Average Outstanding Shares (in millions)136.0136.3134.9133.1
Economic Average EPS (non-GAAP)$4.54$7.06$7.41$9.07
Year-over-Year Economic EPS Growth (non-GAAP)55.7%4.9%22.4%
Economic Average Diluted EPS Growth (non-GAAP)27.7%
(1)
Net income for 2018 was adjusted upward by $106 million in connection with the Consortium Acquisition.
Economic Average Unlevered Return (Non-GAAP)
(unaudited, $ in millions)
FY19FY20FY21
Pre-Tax Income$1,098$977$1,741
Interest Expense9701,027937
Change in Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses98322(174)
Intangible Amortization453732
Economic Unlevered Return (non-GAAP)$2,211$2,363$2,536
Average Net Receivables17,05517,99718,281
Economic Unlevered ROR (non-GAAP)13.0%13.1%13.9%
Economic Average Unlevered Return (%) (non-GAAP)13.3%
A-4

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-pxy_proxy1bw.jpg]
SCAN TOVIEW MATERIALS & VOTE ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC.ATTN: SECRETARY601 N.W. SECOND STREETEVANSVILLE, INDIANA 47708 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode aboveUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic deliveryof information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2022. Have yourproxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions toobtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSIf you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxymaterials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxycards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign upfor electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using theInternet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxymaterials electronically in future years.VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 12, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand whenyou call and then follow the instructions.VOTE BY MAILMark, sign and date
your proxy card and return it in the postage-paidenvelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D83151-P73487 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all the nominees listed under Proposal 1: 1. To elect three Class III directors to serve until the 2025Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Nominees:01) Valerie Soranno Keating02) Aneek S. Mamik03) Richard A. Smith The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for OneMain Holdings, Inc. for the yearending December 31, 2022. NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote at their discretion upon any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment orpostponement thereof. ForAllWithholdAllFor AllExcept To withhold authority to vote for any individualnominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor,administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each signpersonally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporateor partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

[MISSING IMAGE: tm223535d1-pxy_proxy2bw.jpg]
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com D83152-P73487 ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC.Annual Meeting of StockholdersJune 13, 2022 3:00 P.M. Central TimeThis proxy is solicited by the Board of DirectorsThe stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Douglas H. Shulman, Micah R. Conrad, Lily Fu Claffee, and Jack R. Erkilla, or any of them as proxies, each with the power to appoint a substitute and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy, and at their discretion on any matter that may properly come before the meeting, all of the shares of common stock of OneMain Holdings, Inc. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, to be held at 3:00 P.M., Central Time, on Monday, June 13, 2022, at601 NW Second Street, Evansville, Indiana 47708. This proxy hereby revokes any proxies previously submitted by the stockholder with respect to the shares represented by this proxy.IF NO OTHER INDICATION IS MADE ON AN EXECUTED PROXY CARD, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSAL 2. THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.Continued and to be signed on reverse side